Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 241 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/04/2013 Page 1 of 4

Date

Unknown

Source

DOJ Data Set 9

Reference

efta-efta01081208

Pages

Persons

Integrity

No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0upvotesShare

Post Reddit

Save Post Watch

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure

Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 241 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/04/2013 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S FOURTH MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF DELIBERATIVE PROCESS PRIVILEGE Respondent, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Fourth Motion for Enlargement of Time to File Declaration in Support of Deliberative Process Privilege, and states: I. On September 23, 2013, this Court granted the government's motion for enlargement of time to file declaration in support of invocation of the deliberative process privilege. The Court granted the government until Friday, October 4, 2013, to file the declaration. ■. 240. 2. The undersigned had prepared a draft declaration for review by Department of Justice components, including the Office of the Deputy Attorney General (ODAG)), and Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR), and also provided the OPR documents for which the deliberative process privilege had been invoked. The draft and documents were being reviewed in preparation for final approval by the ODAG, and filing by October 4, 2013. 3. On October I, 2013, the federal government shutdown commenced. Due to the lapse in appropriations, many officials at OPR and the ODAG were furloughed. At mid-week, the undersigned found out that the ODAG official he was working with had been furloughed, as well as the OPR official who had been the main point of contact for obtaining the declaration. The EFTA01081208 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 241 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/04/2013 Page 2 of 4 undersigned has located senior level officials at ODAG and OPR, who have not been furloughed, to seek their assistance in obtaining the declaration. 4. The undersigned has briefed the ODAG official on the privilege issue, the CVRA litigation, and the documents which are the subject of the privilege assertion. Because the process is essentially starting over, the government needs an additional two weeks, up to and including October 18, 2013, to file the declaration invoking the deliberative process privilege. This additional time will permit the ODAG to fully review the matter, pose any questions to the undersigned, and make its determination. 5. Accordingly, the government respectfully requests an enlargement of time of fourteen days, up to and including October 18, 2013, to file its declaration from the DOJ in support of the deliberative process privilege. CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE On October 4, 2013, the undersigned contacted petitioners' counsel regarding the instant motion. Petitioners' counsel graciously did not oppose this motion. At present, petitioners' reply in support of their renewed motion for an order directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to withhold relevant evidence is due on October 15, 2013, ten days after the filing of the government's declaration. ■. 240. In the event the Court grant's the government's motion, the government respectfully requests that petitioners' date for filing their reply be enlarged to October 28, 2013. DATED: October 4, 2013 Respectfully submitted, WILFREDO A. FERRER UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: s/ Dexter A. Lee DEXTER A. LEE Assistant U.S. Attorney 2 EFTA01081209 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 241 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/04/2013 Page 3 of 4 ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on October 4, 2013, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. s/ Dexter A. Lee DEXTER A. LEE Assistant U.S. Attorney SERVICE LIST Jane Does 1 and 2 v. United States, Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., Farmer, Jaffe, Weissin Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, Paul G. Cassell S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah Attorneys for Jane Doe # 1 and Jane Doe # 2 Roy Black Jackie Perczek Black, Srebnick, Komspan & Stumpf, ■ 3 EFTA01081210 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 241 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/04/2013 Page 4 of 4 Attorneys for Intervenors 4 EFTA01081211

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Case #9:08-CV-80736-KAM

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CI V-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE # I and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS' FIRST REOUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THE GOVERNMENT The United States (hereinafter the "government") hereby responds to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's First Request for Admissions to the Government Regarding Questions Relevant to Their Pending Action Concerning the Crime Victims Rights Act (hereinafter the "Request for Admissions"), and states as follows:' I. The government admits that the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO") conducted an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and developed evidence and information in contemplation of a potential federal prosecution against Epstein for many federal sex offenses. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. I. The government's res

65p

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 312 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/23/2015 Page 1 of 3

Court UnsealedSep 9, 2019

Epstein Depositions

10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps

839p

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-MarratIVIatthewman JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' NOTICE OF FILING THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL PRIVILEGE LOG Pursuant to the Court's June 18, 2013 Omnibus Order (DE 190), the Respondent, United States of America, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby gives notice of its filing of its Third Supplemental Privilege Log. The index has been marked with Bates Numbers P-014924 thru P-015267. The documents referenced in the Third Supplemental Privilege Log will be delivered tomorrow to the Chambers of U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra for ex parte in camera review, pursuant to the Court's Omnibus Order. Respectfully submitted, WIFREDO A. FERRER UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: s/A. Marie Villafafia A. MARIE VILLAFAFIA Assistant United States Attorney Florida Bar No. 0018255 500 South Australian Ave, Suite 40

446p

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 224-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 1 of 70

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 224-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 1 of 70 EXHIBIT A PRIVILEGE LOG - WITH VICTIMS' OBJECTIONS EFTA00208682 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 224-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 2 of 70 PRIVILEGE LOG - WITH VICTIMS' OBJECTIONS Key to Objections (linking to Victims' Motion to Compel Production of Docments that Are Not Prig ileged Objection General Objections -- Inadequate Privilege Log Failure to Prove Factual Underpinnings of Privilege Claim Waiver of Confidentiality Government's Fiduciary Duty to Crime Victims Bars Privilege Communications Facilitating Crime-Fraud-Misconduct Not Covered Factual Materials Not Covered Documents Not Prepared in Anticipation of CVRA Litigation Attorney Client Objections - Ordinary Governmental Communications Not Covered Attorney-Client Relationship Not Established Deliberative Process Objections - Privilege Not Properly Invoked Final Decision Exempted from Privilege Qualified Privilege Ove

70p

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/17/2012 Page 1 of 23

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/17/2012 Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE 1 and JANE DOE 2, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING OF INTERVENORS ROY BLACK, MARTIN WEINBERG, AND JAY LEFKOWITZ IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER CONCERNING PRODUCTION, USE, AND DISCLOSURE OF PLEA NEGOTIATIONS During the hearing on August 12, 2011, the Court directed the proposed intervenors to file additional briefing on their argument that plea negotiations are privileged and not subject to discovery or use as evidence in these proceedings. Proposed intervenors submit the following memorandum of law, which is identical to Parts I and II of the memorandum of law submitted by proposed intervenor Jeffrey Epstein in support of his motion for a protective order and his opposition to the motions of the plaintiffs for production, use,

23p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Donate More ways to support →

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.