Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta01087780DOJ Data Set 9Other

The Florida Bar Inquiry/Complaint Form

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta01087780
Pages
3
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
The Florida Bar Inquiry/Complaint Form Your Name: Jeffrey Epstein Attorney's Name: Bradley Edwards, Esa„ William Berner. Esa. and Scott W. Rothstein Address: Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, pA, 401 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1650 City: West Palm Beach State: a City: Fort Lauderdale State: FL Phone: 33401 Zip Code: Phone: Zip Code: 33301 ACAP Reference No. PART TWO: The specific thing or things I am complaining about are: 1. I am the Defendant in cases styled E.W. v. Epstein, Case No. 502008CA028051XXXXMB AB, L.M. v. Epstein, Case No. 502008CA028058)0(XXMB AB In the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida and Jane Doe v. Epstein, Case No. 08-CIV-80893 Marra/Johnson, United States District Court, Southern District Court of Florida. 2. Mr. Edwards, Mr. Berger and Scott Rothstein, through their firm, Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler, P.A., ('RRAN) represented and currently represent the three Plaintiffs listed above, L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe; and, possibly other individuals. 3. Based upon the news media reports of Mr. Rothstein running a covert Investment scheme built on legal settlements, it is my belief that the above-referenced lawyers obtained investors in the various cases against me by promising those investors a piece/share of the fees, settlements or verdicts reached in these cases. EFTA01087780 4. Mr. Edwards has represented to my attorneys on multiple occasions that he believes these cases are worth tens of millions of dollars. Extensive discovery has taken place by Mr. Edwards with what appears an unlimited budget to litigate these cases. 5. I believe that the above lawyers and RRA improperly, unethically and potentially illegally solicited investors in these personal injury contingent cases to front money for payment of bills and costs with the understanding In writing or orally that the investors would receive a share of the attorneys fee or prospective settlement or judgment if and when any return was realized. 6. As of the current date, I have settled no cases with Mr. Edwards, Mr. Berger, Mr. Rothstein or RRA. 7. I believe various Florida Rules have been broken by the above-referenced attomeys with this investment scheme. I believe the following Bar Rules, but not limited to these Rules have been violated: Rule 4-1.2(d), 4-1.4; 4-1.5(aXdXf)(g); 4-1.8(aXeXf)(i); 4- 8.3 and 4-8.4. PART THREE: The witnesses In support of my allegations are: 1. Bradley Edwards, Esq., William Berger, Esq., Scott Rothstein, Esq., Judge Herbert Stettin, the receiver, Stuart Rosenfeldt, Esq.; partners of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A., 401 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1650, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301; investors (unknown to me at this time). 2. My attorneys as to what has been said to them re: alleged value of the cases, Robert D. Griffon, Jr., Esq. and Michael•J. Pike, Esq. of Burman, 2 EFTA01087781 Critton, Luther and Coleman, 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 3. The Plaintiffs, E.W. and Jane Doe (S.R.). PART FOUR: Under penalty of perjury, I declare the foregoing facts are true, correct to 3 EFTA01087782

Technical Artifacts (2)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Wire RefReference
Wire Refreferenced

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.