Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta01093426DOJ Data Set 9Other

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta01093426
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, etc., et al., Defendants. ORDER ON COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE UNTIMELY OBJECTIONS TO FINANCIAL DISCOVERY THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Counter-Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Untimely Objections to Financial Discovery. The Court heard argument of counsel, reviewed the court file, has reviewed the authorities counsel has cited, has reviewed the discovery along with the objections filed on behalf of the Counter-Defendant. Based upon the foregoing, and after a thorough review of same, it is CONSIDERED, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: The Counter-Defendant's Objections to Discovery other than privilege (including but not limited to constitutional guarantees under the V, VI and XIV Amendments, attorney/client privilege, work product privilege, privacy privilege under the Florida Constitution or any other applicable privilege) are overruled. However, as to any privileges other than a privilege against self-incrimination as guaranteed by the V, VI and XIV Amendments of the United States Constitution, the Counter-Defendant shall file a detailed privilege log outlining the documents and the applicable privilege. The Counter-Defendant shall not be required to list any documents he contends are EFTA01093426 Epstein v. Rothstein, et at. Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMRA0 Order Page 2 privileged pursuant to the V, VI and XIV Amendments. The privilege log as well as more complete responses shall be filed within fifteen (15) days of the date of this Order. DONE AND ORDERED this _raay of Marcy 013 at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida. Copy furnished: Sec attached list. EFTA01093427

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Extensive RRA Contact List Linking Donald Trump's Attorney and Multiple Epstein‑Case Lawyers

The document provides a detailed roster of attorneys, paralegals, investigators, and staff associated with the RRA (presumably a law firm or litigation consortium) handling Jeffrey Epstein‑related mat Alan Garten is identified as "Donald Trump's attorney" within the RRA contact list. Multiple attorneys are listed as "Counsel for other Epstein Victims," indicating a broader litigatio The list inclu

2p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Attorney alleges Rothstein used Epstein lawsuits to lure investors and links high‑profile associates to alleged child‑molestation scheme

The passage provides a potentially actionable lead that a law firm partner (Scott Rothstein) may have marketed litigation against Jeffrey Epstein to attract investors for his Ponzi scheme, and it name Attorney joined Rothstein’s firm in April 2009 and brought clients with lawsuits against Epstein. Allegations that Rothstein presented those lawsuits to investors to fund his Ponzi scheme. Claims tha

1p
Court UnsealedSep 9, 2019

Epstein Depositions

10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps

839p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Bradley J. Edwards files renewed motion for summary judgment in Jeffrey Epstein civil case

The passage merely restates a routine procedural filing without revealing new evidence, financial flows, or connections to high‑level officials. It offers minimal investigative value beyond confirming Edwards seeks summary judgment, claiming no genuine issue of material fact. Alleges no evidence of fraud by Edwards against Epstein. References three alleged victims of Epstein linked to Edwards.

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Counsel list filing for Jeffrey Epstein case (House Oversight document)

The document only provides attorney contact information and a case number for a filing related to Jeffrey Epstein. It contains no substantive allegations, financial details, or connections to high‑lev Case number: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Multiple law firms listed as counsel for Jeffrey Epstein Filing appears to be a notice of supplement in a court proceeding

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

BuzzFeed Review Finds Little Concrete Evidence Linking Bill Clinton to Jeffrey Epstein Misconduct

The document largely recaps existing reporting and court‑record reviews, noting that no hard evidence directly ties former President Bill Clinton to criminal activity by Jeffrey Epstein. It does highl Clinton appears on 13 documented flights on Epstein's private jet, often accompanied by Epstein aide Attorney Jack Scarola warned of “extortionate threats, power, wealth or political pressure” when a

10p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.