Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 109 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/14/2011 Page 1 of 2

Date

Unknown

Source

DOJ Data Set 9

Reference

efta-efta01098058

Pages

Persons

Integrity

No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0upvotesShare

Post Reddit

Save Post Watch

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure

Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 109 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/14/2011 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE 1 and JANE DOE 2, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR LEAVE To FILE OVERLONG PLEADING Jeffrey Epstein seeks leave to file his Omnibus Reply in Support of His Motion For Limited Intervention, which is 20 pages. Undersigned counsel communicated with Paul Cassell, counsel for the plaintiffs, who indicated that he did not object to a 15-page reply, but objects to the additional five pages. We are awaiting response from the government on its position on this motion. Mr. Epstein has filed one pleading, replying to all the arguments made by both the plaintiffs and the government concerning Mr. Epstein's motion for limited intervention. Even though Mr. Epstein could have filed two separate replies, each consisting of the 10 pages provided by the Rules, we believe that addressing all of the issues in one document rather than piecemeal by breaking them up into two pleadings is more efficient for all involved, including the Court. We communicated with plaintiffs' counsel some weeks ago and advised them of our intention to file one omnibus reply rather than break up the replies into two pleadings. Plaintiffs' counsel responded in writing that they did not have a problem with that. The issues raised in these and related papers are significant, numerous, and at times complicated. Indeed, the plaintiffs themselves have had to exceed the page limits provided by the EFTA01098058 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 109 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/14/2011 Page 2 of 2 Rules in filing their response to the lawyers' supplemental briefing, and they had the benefit and courtesy of being able to file an unopposed motion to exceed the page limit. [DE 105]. We have made every effort to address each issue in an efficient manner, and believe the 20- page omnibus reply is necessary to fully address all the arguments raised by the parties, and in particular the claims made by the plaintiffs that the law does not support the relief requested by Mr. Epstein. A significant portion of the pleading is devoted to citing all the cases that unequivocally rebut the plaintiffs' claims. Accordingly, we respectfully request that the Court grant Mr. Epstein leave to file his overlong omnibus reply in support of his motion for limited intervention. We certify that on October 14, 2011, the foregoing document was filed electronically with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system. Respectfully submitted, BLACK, SREBNICK, KORNSPAN & STUMPF, P.A. 201 South Biscayne Boulevard Suite 1300 Miami, Florida 33131 Offi Fax: By /S/ ROY BLACK, ESQ. Florida Bar No. 126088 JACKIE PERCZEK, ESQ. Florida Bar No. 0042201 On Behalf opetey Epstein 2 EFTA01098059

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Case #9:08-CV-80736-KAM

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 216 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2013 Page 1 of 2

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 216 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2013 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08.80736-Civ-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOES #1 AND #2, Petitioners, I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' NOTICE OF FILING SUPPLEMENTAL PRIVILEGE LOG Pursuant to the Court's June 18, 2013 Omnibus Order (DE 190), the Respondent, United States of America, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby gives notice of its filing of its Privilege Log, which is attached hereto. The documents referenced in the Privilege Log are being delivered today to the Chambers of U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Mama for ex pane in camera review, pursuant to the Court's Omnibus Order. Respectfully submitted, WIFREDO A. FERRER UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: Assistant United States Attorney Florida Bar No. 500 South Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach. FL 33401 Telephone; Facsimile: EFTA00223850

16p

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 265-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/20/2014 Page 1 of 64

64p

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01689016

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 216 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2013 Page 1 of 2

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 216 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2013 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOES #1 AND #2, Petitioners, I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' NOTICE OF FILING SUPPLEMENTAL PRIVILEGE LOG Pursuant to the Court's June 18, 2013 Omnibus Order (DE 190), the Respondent, United States of America, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby gives notice of its filing of its Privilege Log, which is attached hereto. The documents referenced in the Privilege Log are being delivered today to the Chambers of U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra for ex pane in camera review, pursuant to the Court's Omnibus Order. Respectfully submitted, WIFREDO A. FERRER UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: I I I I a EFTA00209306 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 216 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2013 Page 2 of 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIF

16p

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CI V-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE # I and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS' FIRST REOUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THE GOVERNMENT The United States (hereinafter the "government") hereby responds to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's First Request for Admissions to the Government Regarding Questions Relevant to Their Pending Action Concerning the Crime Victims Rights Act (hereinafter the "Request for Admissions"), and states as follows:' I. The government admits that the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO") conducted an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and developed evidence and information in contemplation of a potential federal prosecution against Epstein for many federal sex offenses. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. I. The government's res

65p

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case: 13-12923

46p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Donate More ways to support →

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.