Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta01101045DOJ Data Set 9Other

04/15/2011 17:01 Fax

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta01101045
Pages
3
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
04/15/2011 17:01 Fax #201874/mep JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s), vs. SEARCY DENNEY a001/003 t: SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and LA., individually, Defendant(s). IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN I ‘ND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXM BAG REOUEST TO PRODUCE TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, Bradley J. Edwards by and through his undersigned counsel, reqLests, pursuant to Rule 1.350 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, that Plaintiff/Counter Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, produce and permit Bradley J. Edwards to inspect and copy each of the following documents*: 1. MI documents* constituting, reflecting, or relating to communications between Plaintiff or any agent of Plaintiff on the one hand, and William Scherer, or any person associated with William Scherer in the practice of law, any prosecuting, law enforcement, and/or government entity which communication relates directly or indirectly to any allegation of illegal activity or tortuous conduct in which Epstein is alleged to have engaged. **Documents" shall include, but not be limited to all non-identical copies of writings, drags, graphs, charts, photographs, phono-records, recordings, and/or any other data co pilations from which information can be obtained, translated, if necessary, by the party to EFTA01101045 04/15/2011 17:02 FAX SEARCY DENNEY el 002/003 Edvierds adv. Epstein Case No.: 50200SCA040800XXXXMBAG Request to Produce to Jeffrey Epstein whom the request is directed through detection devices into reasonably usable form. "DTI cuments" also include all electronic data as well as application metadata and system meiadato. All inventories and rosters of your information technology (IT) systems—e.g., hardware, software and data, including but not limited to network drawings, lists of computing devlices (servers, PCs, laptops, PDAs, cell phones, with data storage and/or transmission fe,aiures), programs, data maps and security tools and protocols. I It is requested that the aforesaid production be made within thirty days of service of this reqLest at the offices of Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, III, 2139 Palm Beach Laldes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, Florida. Inspection will be made by visual observation, examination and/or copying. I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by Faxl and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, of pril, 2 t 11. Jack Flori r No.: 169440 Se. enney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard est Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: Fax: Attorneys for Bradley I. Edwards 2 EFTA01101046 04/15/2011 17:02 FAX SEARCY DENNEY W003/003 Edu lards adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800)OOO(MBAG Request to Produce to Jeffrey Epstein COUNSEL LIST Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Attbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. Att mey For: Jeffrey Epstein 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 PhOne: Faaf: Failmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lett -man, PL A mey For: Jeffi-ey Epstein 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Foil Lauderdale, FL 33301 Ph na MArc S. Nurik Lent Offices of Marc S. Nurik A rney For: Scott Rothstein E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phbne: Fait: Joeph L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire Fo ler White Burnett, P.A. A ey For: Jeffrey Epstein 901 Phillips Point West 777 S Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 Phque: Fait: 3 EFTA01101047

Technical Artifacts (2)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone401-6170
Wire Refreflecting

Related Documents (6)

House OversightDepositionNov 11, 2025

Deposition Transcript of Bradley J. Edwards in Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein Litigation (Palm Beach, FL)

The document provides a formal deposition record linking Jeffrey Epstein to a civil case against Scott Rothstein and other defendants, confirming the existence of litigation and identifying attorneys Deposition taken on March 23, 2010 in a case titled Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Identifies plaintiff’s counsel Robert D. Critton, Jr. and defendant’s counsel Jack Alan Goldberger

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Order documents from our nationwide document retrieval service.

Order documents from our nationwide document retrieval service. - OR - Call 1.866.540.8818. Florida Circuit & County Courts FL Circuit & County - Palm Beach (Palm Beach) 502008CA005240XXXXMB Cma, I. Epstein, Jeffrey et al The case was last updated by the court on Friday, October 22, 2010 Header Case Number: 502008CA005240XXXXMB Date Filed: 02/21/2008 Date Full Case Retrieved: 10/22/2010 Status: Pending Misc: (180) OTHER CIRCUIT; Circuit Civil [Summary][Additional Case Information][Participants][Additional Counsel][Calendar][Fees][Proceedings] Summary Judge: FIAFELE, JUDGE DONALD W Back to Too Additional Case Information Clerk Case Number: 2008ca005240 Outstanding Warrant/Summon/Capias: Y Jury Trial: J Closed Case: N Last Docket Date: 04/20/2009 Status Date: 04/20/2009 Back to Too Participants Litigant Cma, Plaintiff Epstein, Jeffrey Defendant Kellen. Sarah Defendant Attorney Willits. Richard H 2290 10th Ave N Suite 404 Lake Worth FL 33461 Back to To

69p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Counsel list filing for Jeffrey Epstein case (House Oversight document)

The document only provides attorney contact information and a case number for a filing related to Jeffrey Epstein. It contains no substantive allegations, financial details, or connections to high‑lev Case number: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Multiple law firms listed as counsel for Jeffrey Epstein Filing appears to be a notice of supplement in a court proceeding

1p
House OversightFBI ReportNov 11, 2025

[REDACTED - Survivor] interview implicates Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew and other high‑profile figures in alleged und...

The transcript provides first‑hand allegations linking Epstein and Maxwell to a network that allegedly included Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, Les Wexner, Alan Dershowitz and other powerful individuals. Roberts says she was recruited at age 15 by Ghislaine Maxwell to work for Epstein after meeting him Describes a concealed ‘secret room’ in Epstein’s mansion filled with pornographic photographs. Cla

29p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 291-15 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/21/2015 Page 1 of

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 291-15 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/21/2015 Page 1 of 40 EXHIBIT 16 EFTA00081180 Case 9:08-cv-807m091349pept Z91-15 _EriterM ocp WERocisstifolf/E15 Page 2 of roio-< uoc 16q0,3 e 0 EXHIBIT C Epstein vs. Edwards Undisputed Statement of Facts EFTA00081181 Case 9:08-cv-807ailaVs kigsyffigt 28415-c1p6Arger phri N 7NRocieatgfe)10/§815 Page 3 of IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Case No.: 50 2009 CA 040800XXXKMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, VS. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY I EDWARDS, individually, Defendants, STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS Defendant Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., offers the following specific facts as the undisputed material facts in this case. Each of the following facts is numbered separately and individually to facilitate Epstein's required compliance with Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.510(c) ("The adverse party shall identify . . . any summary judgment evidence on wh

40p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Attorney Bradley Edwards alleges Jeffrey Epstein's non‑prosecution agreement, 5th Amendment tactics, and a unique George Rush tape as key evidence ...

The affidavit details a non‑prosecution agreement that shielded Epstein from federal charges, claims that Epstein repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment to block discovery, and describes a purportedly Epstein secured a federal non‑prosecution agreement that barred criminal charges for ~30 victims in All co‑defendants and Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment, leaving plaintiffs with no substantive

23p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.