Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta01102337DOJ Data Set 9Other

JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta01102337
Pages
3
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, VS. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J, EDWARDS, Individually, and L.M., individually. Defendants. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF JURY TRIAL Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein, by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 1.440 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby moves this Court to enter an order striking the Defendant Bradley Edwards' notice of jury trial. In support thereof, Plaintiff states: 1. That Defendant's notice for jury trial is ambiguous as to which "action" is at issue and ready to be set for trial, as it does not delineate therein whether the notice is for Plaintiff's case in chief or Defendant's Counterclaim; 2. That with respect to Plaintiff's case in chief, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is pending. Because this is a motion directed at Plaintiff's last pleading, Defendant's Notice of Jury Trial is improper. See Naranja Princeton Community Development Corp. v. Cornerstone Development Group, Inc., 34 So. 3d 124 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010) (quoting Rule 1.440 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure); 3. That with respect to Defendant's Counterclaim, Defendant served his Notice for Jury Trial contemporaneously with his Motion to Compel Proper Answer or to EFTA01102337 Deem Unanswered Allegations Admitted; a motion directed at Plaintiff's last pleading in Defendant's Counterclaim; thereby rendering his Notice for Jury Trial improper. See id.; 4. That because Defendant served his Notice of Jury Trial contemporaneously with his Reply to Affirmative Defenses to his own Counterclaim, Defendant's notice of jury trial is improper because it was filed sooner than 20 days after the service of the last pleading. See id; Wherefore Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein respectfully requests that this Court strike Defendant Bradley Notice of Jury Trial, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper. WE HEREBY CERTIFY that Plaintiff attempted, as required, to resolve this matter prior to filing this Motion, and that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served upon all parties listed on the attached service list, via electronic and US Mail, this June 2012. Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq. Fla. Bar No.: 0176737 LAW OFFICES OF TONIA HADDAD, PA 524 South Andrews Avenue Suite 200N Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 (facsimile) 2 EFTA01102338 SERVICE LIST CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola et al. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Jack Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury, Goldberger, & Weiss, PA 250 Australian Ave. South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Marc Nurik, Esq. 1 East Broward Blvd. Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman 425 N Andrews Avenue Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq. LS Law Firm Four Seasons Tower - 15th Floor 1441 Brickell Avenue Miami, Florida 33131 EFTA01102339

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.