Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM Document 1

Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2009 Page 1 of 27 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE No. 102, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 09-80656 Civil Action No CIV-RYSKAMP MAGISTRATE JUDGE VITUNAC I AILED by 433 D C INTAKE MAY - 1 2009 STEVEN M. ‘AFVMORE CLERK U.S. OUST. CT COMPLAINT AND Defendant. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, brings this Complaint against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and states as follows: PARTIES. JUFtl$DICTION. AND VENUE 1. At all times material to this cause of action, Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, was a resident of Palm Beach County, Florida. 2. This Complaint is brought under a fictitious name to protect the identity of Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, because this Complaint makes sensitive allegations of sexual assault and abuse of a then minor. 3. At all times material to this cause of action, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, had a residence located at 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida. 4. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, is currently a citizen of the State of Florida, as he is currently incarcerated in the Palm Beach County Stockade. 5. At all times material to this cause of action, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, was an adult male born in 1953. Podhurst Orseck, 25 West Stagier Street, Suite 80:0, Miami, FL 33130, Miami 3063582800 Fax 305.3582182 • Fort Lauderdale 954.463.4346 wwmpodltuntemat EFTA01107189 Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2009 Page 2 of 27 6. This Court has jurisdiction over this action and the claims set forth herein pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255. 7. This Court has venue of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b), as a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred in this District. STATEMENT OF FACTS 8. At all relevant times, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, was an adult male, spanning the ages of 45 and 55 years old. Epstein is known as a billionaire financier and money manager with a secret clientele limited exclusively to billionaires. He is a man of tremendous wealth, power, and influence. He owns a fleet of aircraft that includes a Gulfstream IV, a helicopter, and a Boeing 727, as well as a fleet of motor vehicles. Until his incarceration, he maintained his principal place of residence in the largest home in Manhattan, a 51,000-square-foot eight-story mansion on the Upper East Side. Upon information and belief, he also owns a $6.8 million mansion in Palm Beach, Florida, a $30 million 7,500-acre ranch in New Mexico he named "Zorro," a 70-acre private island known as Little St. James in St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands, a mansion in London's Westminster neighborhood, and a home in the Avenue Foch area of Paris. The allegations herein concern Defendant's conduct while at his lavish homes and/or numerous other locations both nationally and internationally. 9. Upon information and belief, Defendant has a sexual preference for underage minor girls. He engaged in a plan, scheme, or enterprise in which he gained access to countless vulnerable and relatively economically disadvantaged minor girls, and sexually assaulted, molested, and/or exploited these girls, and then gave them money. 10. Beginning in or around 1998 through in or around September 2007, Defendant used his resources and his influence over vulnerable minor girls to engage in a systematic pattern of sexually exploitative behavior. Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Flagier Street, Suite 800, Miami, FL 33130, Miami 305.358.2800 Fax 305.3502382 • Fort Lauderdale 954.463.4346 www.podluirst.com EFTA01107190 Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2009 Page 3 of 27 II. Defendant's plan and scheme reflected a particular pattern and method. Defendant coerced and enticed impressionable, vulnerable, and relatively economically less fortunate minor girls to participate in various acts of sexual misconduct that he committed upon them. Defendant's scheme involved the use of underage girls, as well as other individuals, to recruit other underage girls. Upon information and belief, Defendant and/or an authorized agent would call and alert Defendant's assistants shortly before or after he arrived at his Palm Beach residence. His assistants would call economically disadvantaged and underage girls from West Palm Beach and surrounding areas who would be enticed by the money being offered and who Defendant and/or his assistants perceived as less likely to complain to authorities or have credibility issues if allegations of improper conduct were made. The then minor Plaintiff and other minor girls, some as young as 12 years old, were transported to Defendant's Palm Beach mansion by Defendant's employees, agents, and/or assistants in order to provide Defendant with "massages." 12. Many of the instances of illegal sexual conduct committed by Defendant were perpetrated with the assistance, support, and facilitation of at least three assistants who helped him orchestrate this child exploitation enterprise. These assistants would often arrange times for underage girls to come to Defendant's residence, transport or cause the transportation of underage girls to Defendant's residence, escort the underage girls to the massage room where Defendant would be waiting or would enter shortly thereafter, urge the underage girls to remove their clothes, deliver cash from Defendant to the underage girls and/or their procurers at the conclusion of each "massage appointment," and, upon information and belief, take nude photographs and/or videos of the underage girls for Defendant with and/or without their knowledge. Defendant would pay the procurer of each girl's "appointment" hundreds of dollars. 3 Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800, Miami, FL 33130, Miami 3053582803 Fax 305358.2382 • Fort Lauderdale 956.4634346 www.podhurstcorn EFTA01107191 Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05704/2009 Page 4 of 27 13. Epstein designed this scheme to secure a private place in Defendant's Palm Beach mansion where only persons employed and invited by Epstein would be present, so as to reduce the chance of detection of Defendant's sexual abuse and prostitution as well as to make it more difficult for the minor girls to flee the premises and/or to credibly report his actions to law enforcement or other authorities. The girls were usually transported by his employees, agents, and/or assistants or by a taxicab paid for by Defendant in order to make it difficult for the girls to flee his mansion. 14. Upon arrival at Defendant's Palm Beach mansion, each underage victim would generally be introduced to one of Defendant's assistants, who would gather the girl's personal contact information. The minor girl would then be led up a flight of stairs to a room that contained a massage table and a large shower. The staircase leading to the room was plastered with nude photographs of young girls, including some photographs depicting two or more young girls engaged in lewd acts. Upon information and belief, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, had such photographs in each of his six homes and/or on his computers. 15. At times, if it was the girl's first "massage" appointment, another female would be in the room to "lead the way" until Defendant would have her leave. Generally, Defendant would start his massage wearing only a small towel, which eventually would be removed. Defendant and/or the other female would direct the girl to massage him, giving the minor girl specific instructions as to where and how he wanted to be touched, and then direct her to remove her clothing. He would then perform one or more lewd, lascivious, and sexual acts, including masturbation, fondling the minor's breasts and/or sexual organs, touching the minor's vulva, vagina, and/or anus with a vibrator and/or back massager and/or his finger(s) and/or his penis, digitally penetrating her vagina, performing intercourse, oral sex, and/or anal sex, and/or coercing or attempting to coerce the girl to engage in lewd acts and/or prostitution and/or 4 Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 1CO .114, 2- EWA if, Ili/ EFTA01107192 Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2009 Page 5 of 27 enticing the then minor girl to engage in sexual acts with another female in Defendant's presence. The exact degree of molestation and frequency with which the sexual exploitations took place varied and is not yet completely known; however, Defendant committed such acts regularly on a daily basis and, in most instances, several times a day. In order to facilitate the daily exchanges of money for sexual assault and abuse, Defendant kept U.S. currency readily available. 16. Defendant, Epstein, traveled to his mansion in Palm Beach for the purpose of luring minor girls to his mansion to sexually abuse and/or batter them. He used the telephone to contact these minor girls for the purpose of coercing them into acts of prostitution and to enable himself to commit sexual battery against them and/or acts of lewdness in their presence, and he conspired with others, including assistants and/or his driver(s) and/or pilot(s), and his socialite friend/partner, Ghislaine Maxwell, to further these acts and to avoid police detection. Defendant's systematic pattern of sexually exploitative behavior referred to in paragraph 10 and described in paragraphs I 1 through the present paragraph occurred in all of Defendant's domestic and international residences and/or places of lodging and/or modes of transportation. 17. Consistent with the foregoing plan and scheme, Defendant used his money, wealth, and power to unduly and improperly manipulate and influence the then minor Plaintiff. A vulnerable young girl, Plaintiff was working as a changing mom assistant at The Mar-A-Lago Club in Palm Beach making approximately S9 an hour when she was first lured into Defendant's sexually exploitative world. In or about the summer of 1998, when Plaintiff was merely fifteen years old while attending to her duties at Mar-A-Lago, Plaintiff was recruited by Ghislaine Maxwell, who lived, traveled, socialized, and worked with Defendant. Ms. Maxwell asked Plaintiff if she was interested in learning massage therapy and earning a great deal of money while learning the profession. Plaintiffs father, who was a maintenance manager at The Mar-A- 5 Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Flagler Street Suite 800, Miami, FL 33130, Miami 305358.2800 Fax 305.3582382 • Fort Lauderdale 954.4633346 I www.podhunt.com EFTA01107193 Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2009 Page 6 of 27 Lago Club, was not apprehensive because he felt comforted that an older woman had approached Plaintiff with this opportunity. As a result, Plaintiffs father dropped off Plaintiff at Defendant's mansion that same day. Ms. Maxwell met Plaintiff and her father outside of Defendant's Palm Beach mansion, where Ms. Maxwell assured the minor girl's father that Ms. Maxwell would provide transportation home for his teenaged daughter. Ghislaine Maxwell led Plaintiff up a flight of stairs to a spa room with a shower and a massage table. Defendant was lying naked on the massage table. Plaintiff was shocked, but, with no experience with massages, thought this could be massage therapy protocol. Ms. Maxwell then took off her own shirt and left on her underwear and started rubbing her breasts across Defendant's body, impliedly showing Plaintiff what she was expected to do. Ms. Maxwell then told Plaintiff to take off her clothes. The minor girl was apprehensive about doing this, but, in fear, proceeded to follow Ms. Maxwell by removing everything but her underwear. She was then ordered to remove her underwear and to straddle Defendant. The encounter escalated, with Defendant and Ms. Maxwell sexually assaulting, battering, exploiting, and abusing Plaintiff in various ways and in various locations, including the steam room and shower. At the end of this sexually exploitive abuse, Defendant and Ms. Maxwell giddily told Plaintiff to return the following day and told her she had "lots of potential." Defendant paid Plaintiff hundreds of dollars, told her it was for two hours of work, and directed one of his employees to drive her home. 18. Defendant and/or his procurers thereafter lured the then minor Plaintiff to his Palm Beach mansion every day for the next two weeks in order to engage in a similar pattern of sexual exploitation. Defendant and/or his procurers arranged at the end of each incident the transportation and scheduling for the following day's appointment. Additionally, Defendant telephoned the minor Plaintiff himself and/or had Ms. Maxwell telephone Plaintiff to make arrangements. Plaintiff was often times driven to and from Epstein's mansion by Epstein 6 Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 1.1111 I ICI 9921 • c.... 1 mAs...4.1. ORA AIAL EFTA01107194 Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2009 Page 7 of 27 himself or his driver. Alternatively, Defendant or Ms. Maxwell would arrange and pay for Plaintiff's transportation home by taxicab. 19. During Plaintiffs second incident of being sexually exploited and assaulted by Defendant at Defendant's Palm Beach mansion, Defendant asked Plaintiff to quit her job at The Mar-A-Lago Club and travel with him to earn much more money while learning the massage profession. Thus, Plaintiff, an impressionable and vulnerable young girl of modest means, quit her job as a changing room assistant, was lured by Defendant, and continued to be victimized by Defendant, who immersed the minor Plaintiff into Defendant's lewd and abusive lifestyle. Under Defendant's dominion and control, Defendant continuously "groomed" the minor adolescent. Defendant's daily routine required the minor Plaintiff to perform sexually on Defendant multiple times per day and to provide Defendant massages multiple times per day. Plaintiff had absolutely no say as to when, how many times, or what was done during each sexual encounter. Often, Plaintiff was joined by Ms. Maxwell, Ms. Maxwell's assistant, and/or a countless array of young women who would be brought to one of Defendant's homes for the sexual trysts and then be sexually exploited by Defendant. 20. The first time that Defendant transported Plaintiff to another state in order to engage in sexual acts with her occurred when she was merely fifteen years old and after only two weeks of daily sexually abusive encounters with Defendant. Defendant used his private jet to transport the minor Plaintiff to Manhattan, where he provided her with spending money and accommodations with him at his mansion. From the time that Plaintiff was 15 years old, Defendant abused her to serve his every sexual whim, obtaining and purchasing passports and whatever was needed for her to travel with him and/or for him. Defendant transported Plaintiff in his private jet to locations that included Palm Beach, New York City, Santa Fe, Los Angeles, San Francisco, St. Louis, and numerous other domestic destinations, as well as international 7 Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Flagler Street. Suite 800, Mamie FL 33130, Miami 305358.2800 Fax 305358.2382 • Fort Lauderdale 954.463.4346 www.podhurstsom EFTA01107195 Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2009 Page 8 of 27 destinations, including Europe, the Caribbean, and Africa. He provided accommodations with him in order to have her available to him at all times wherever he went, including while transporting the minor Plaintiff on his private jet. Each time they would travel to one of these destinations, the same pattern of sexual abuse would occur, often with a vast array of aspiring models, actresses, celebrities, and/or other females, including minors, from all over the world. Upon information and belief, Defendant transported minor girls from Turkey, the Czech Republic, Asia, and numerous other countries, many of whom spoke no English. To Plaintiff's knowledge, the only females specifically excluded from Defendant's sexual escapades were African-Americans. 21. In addition to being continually exploited to satisfy Defendant's every sexual whim, Plaintiff was also required to be sexually exploited by Defendant's adult male peers, including royalty, politicians, academicians, businessmen, and/or other professional and personal acquaintances. Whenever Defendant transported Plaintiff with him in destination, Defendant would pay Plaintiff a flat rate per day while mentioned associates would sexually exploit and abuse minor Plaintiff. 22. Most of these acts of abuse occurred during a time when Defendant knew that Plaintiff was approximately 15, 16, and 17 years old, and, after years of daily sexual exploitation, continued into her adulthood. Despite Defendant's stating shortly before Plaintiff's sixteenth birthday that he soon would have to trade her in because she was getting too old, Defendant continued to sexually exploit Plaintiff until she NA at age 19. Defendant's predilection for young girls was well known to those who regularly procured them for him and to his circle of friends. On one of Defendant's birthdays, a friend of Defendant sent him three 12-year-old girls from France who spoke no English for Defendant to sexually exploit and abuse. After doing so, they were sent back to France the next day. 8 his private jet to any he and/or his above- Podhurst Orseck, 25 West Flagler Street. Suite 800. Miami, FL 33130, Miami 305358.2800 Fax 305358.1382 • Fort Lauderdale 954A634346 www.podhurstrom EFTA01107196 Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2009 Page 9 of 27 23. Any assertions by Defendant that he was unaware of the age of the then minor Plaintiff are belied by his own actions, and are rendered irrelevant by the provision of applicable federal statutes concerning the sexual exploitation and abuse of a minor child. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, at all times material to this cause of action, knew and should have known of Plaintiff's age of minority. Defendant and Ms. Maxwell acknowledged and celebrated Plaintiff's I6th birthday. Defendant's preference for underage girls was well-known to those who regularly procured them for him. 24. As previously stated in paragraph 14, Defendant displayed nude photographs of underage girls throughout his homes in New York City, Palm Beach, Santa Fe, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, saw photographs of naked young girls in each of Defendant's homes, including a photograph of herself naked at Defendant's home in Palm Beach. When she asked Defendant about it, he stated dismissively that he had naked photographs of her in all of his homes. 25. Upon information and belief, some of the photographs in Defendant's possession were taken with hidden cameras set up in his home in Palm Beach. On the day of his arrest, police found two hidden cameras and photographs of underage girls on a computer in Defendant's home. Upon information and belief, Defendant may have taken lewd photographs of Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, with his hidden cameras and may have transported lewd photographs of Plaintiff (among many other victims) to his other residences and elsewhere using a facility or means of interstate and/or foreign commerce. In addition, while Plaintiff was a minor teenager and upon Ms. Maxwell's insistence after Ms. Maxwell rejected as inappropriate photographs that Plaintiff presented of herself fully clothed, Ms. Maxwell photographed Plaintiff naked in different sexually explicit positions. Ms. Maxwell then presented these nude photographs of Plaintiff to Defendant as a birthday present for Defendant from Ms. Maxwell. 9 Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Hagler Street. Suite 800, Miami, FL 33130, Miami 3053582800 Fax 305.3582382 • Fort Lauderdale 954.463.4346 I EFTA01107197 Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2009 Page 10 of 27 Upon information and belief, one or more nude photographs of Plaintiff that were taken when she was a minor were confiscated by the Palm Beach Sheriff's Office during its execution of a search warrant of Defendant's Palm Beach mansion on October 20, 2005. Upon information and belief, those photographs are still in the custody of law enforcement. 26. It is virtually impossible to calculate the exact number of times that Defendant sexually exploited and abused Plaintiff. From the age of IS. Plaintiff was sexually exploited and abused by Defendant on a daily basis and, most often, multiple times each day. While some of the precise dates these acts occurred are unknown to Plaintiff, these dates are known to Defendant, as he is reported to have kept a written log of each instance in which he engaged in these lewd acts with then minor Plaintiff and others. Upon information and belief, these logs are also in the custody of law enforcement. 27. In or around September 2002, Defendant purchased a commercial round-trip airline ticket, and provided a passport, U.S. currency, and accommodations for Plaintiff to fly to Thailand. While thousands of miles away from Defendant on this extended trip alone for the first time in more than four years, Plaintiff met, fell in love, and married a young man. She escaped from Defendant's abuse with the help and insistence of her new husband and, instead of returning to Defendant, boarded a plane to Australia with one suitcase. 28. Since November 2002, Plaintiff has lived a modest life in Australia, while maintaining lines of communication with her family and without contact with Defendant or any of the people in his entourage. However, suddenly, in 2008, Plaintiff received numerous phone calls from one of Defendant's agents. During these phone calls to Plaintiff, he repeatedly asked whether she knew anything about the civil cases against Defendant, whether she knew any of the females who were proceeding with the civil suits, whether she was planning on filing suit, whether she was communicating and/or cooperating with anyone against Defendant, and whether 10 Podhurst Orseck, P.A. I 9% Watt Flavin Peront Coil.. MIA Miami PI til All Miami am Val SAMPar 1115 VW '71R1 • Pe.•• I AA OSA AKA ALA •••tihr••• ••••••11.• EFTA01107198 Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2009 Page 11 of 27 she would return to the United States to testify. Terrified by Defendant's demonstrated ability to track her down on her changed cell phone number halfway across the world, Plaintiff attempted to reassure Defendant's agent that she would remain quiet. During the course of one of these phone calls from Defendant's agents, Defendant himself spoke on the phone, continued to question her intentions, and, upon being reassured by Plaintiff, thanked her for not getting involved. 29. Around January 2009, Plaintiff received a letter from the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida, informing her of her potential civil claims against Defendant under 18 U.S.C. § 2255. Plaintiff contacted undersigned counsel within days and diligently and repeatedly pursued a good faith viable settlement of her claims against Defendant. Unable to reach a settlement, this lawsuit followed. 30. As a result of these encounters with Defendant, Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, has in the past suffered, and will in the future continue to suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment, loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy, separation from her family, and other damages associated with Defendant's controlling and manipulating her on a daily basis for years into a perverse and unhealthy way of life. 31. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed the above-referenced acts upon Plaintiff in violation of federal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, transport of child pornography, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated I Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Hagler Street, Suite 800. Miami, FL 33130, Miami 305358.2800 Fax 305358.2382 • Fort Lauderdale 954.463.4346 I www.podhurst com EFTA01107199 Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2009 Page 12 of 27 in 18 U.S.C. § 2421, § 2422(a), § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), § 2423(e), § 2251, § 2252, § 2252A(a)(1), and § 2252A(gX1). 32. In June 2008, after investigations by the Palm Beach Police Department, the Palm Beach State Attorney's Office, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, entered pleas of "guilty" to various Florida state crimes involving the solicitation of minors for prostitution and the procurement of minors for the purposes of prostitution in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, Florida. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, is in the same position as if he had been tried and convicted of the sexual offenses committed against Plaintiff and, as such, must admit liability unto Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102. Plaintiff hereby exclusively seeks civil remedies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255. COUNT ONE (Cause of Action for Coercion and Enticement of Minor to Enesee in Prostitution or Sexual Activity pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 in Violation of 18 U.S.C. & 2422(h)) 33. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, hereby adopts, repeats, realleges, and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 32 above. 34. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, used a facility or means of interstate and/or foreign commerce to knowingly persuade, induce, entice, or coerce Jane Doe No. 102, when she was under the age of 18 years, to engage in prostitution and/or sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, or attempted to do so, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b). 35. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255, and, as such, asserts a cause of action against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein. pursuant to this Section of the United States Code. 12 Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 West F1agkr Street, Suite 800, Miami, FL 33130, Miami 305358.2800 Fax 305.358.2382 • Fort Lauderdale 954 463.4346 www.podluest com EFTA01107200 Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 0504/2009 Page 13 of 27 36. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 being committed against the then minor Plaintiff by Defendant, Plaintiff has in the past suffered, and will in the future continue to suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment, loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy, separation from her family, and other damages associated with Defendant's manipulating and leading her into a perverse and unhealthy way of life. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses, and Plaintiff will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature, and Plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, demands judgment against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for all damages available under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, including, without limitation, actual and compensatory damages, attorney's fees, costs of suit, and such other further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. COUNT TWO (Cause of Action for Transportation of Minor with Intent to Engage in Criminal Sexual Activity pursuant to 18 U.S.C. & 2255 in Violation of 18 U.S.C. & 2423(a11 37. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, hereby adopts, repeats, realleges, and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs I through 32 above. 38. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, knowingly transported then minor Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, in interstate and/or foreign commerce, with the intent that Plaintiff engage in prostitution, or in any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, in violation 18 U.S.C. § 2423(a). As previously stated in paragraphs 20, 21, and 27. 13 Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Flagler Street Suite 80), Miami, FL 33130, Miami 305.3582800 Fax 305.3582382 • Fort Lauderdale 954.463.4346 www.podhuntann EFTA01107201 Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04%2009 Page 14 of 27 Defendant transported Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, across state lines and across international borders numerous times from the time that Plaintiff was merely 15 years old through adulthood with the primary intent of sexually exploiting her. 39. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255, and, as such, asserts a cause of action against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code. 40. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 being committed against the then minor Plaintiff by Defendant, Plaintiff has in the past suffered, and will in the future continue to suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment, loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy, separation from her family, and other damages associated with Defendant's manipulating and leading her into a perverse and unhealthy way of life for a minor. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses, and Plaintiff will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature, and Plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, demands judgment against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for all damages available under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, including, without limitation, actual and compensatory damages, attorney's fees, costs of suit, and such other further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jut), on all issues triable as of right by a jury. 14 Podhurst Orsecic, P.A. 25 West Hagler Street, Suite 800, Maori, FL 33130, Miami 305.3582900 Fax 305.358.2382 • Fort Lauderdale 9544434346 www.podhurstcom EFTA01107202 Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/0412009 Page 15 of 27 COUNT THREE (Cause of Action for Travel with Intent to Eneaze in Illicit Sexual Conduct pursuant to 18 U.S.C. $ 2255 in Violation of 18 U.S.C. 8 24230)11 41. Plaintiff; Jane Doe No. 102, hereby adopts, repeats, realleges, and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 32 above. 42. Upon information and belief, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, traveled in interstate and/or foreign commerce with the intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 2423(0, with minor females, including the then minor Plaintiff, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2423(b). 43. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255, and, as such, asserts a cause of action against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code. 44. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 being committed against the then minor Plaintiff by Defendant, Plaintiff has in the past suffered, and will in the future continue to suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment, loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy, separation from her family, and other damages associated with Defendant's manipulating and leading her into a perverse and unhealthy way of life. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses, and Plaintiff will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature, and Plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, demands judgment against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for all damages available under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, including, without limitation, 15 Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Flagler Street, Suite SOD, Miami, Fl. 33130, Miami 305.358.2803 Fax 305.358.7382 • Fort Lauderdale 954.463.4316 www.podhurstoorn EFTA01107203 Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2009 Page 16 of 27 actual and compensatory damages, attorney's fees, costs of suit, and such other further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. COUNT FOUR (Cause of Action for Coercion and Enticement to Ens& in Prostitution or Sexual Activity pursuant to 18 U.S.C. & 2255 in Violation of 18 U.S.C. & 2422(a)1 45. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, hereby adopts, repeats, realleges, and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs I through 32 above. 46. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, knowingly persuaded, induced, enticed, and/or coerced Jane Doe No. 102 to travel in interstate and/or foreign commerce to engage in prostitution and/or sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, or attempted to do so, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422(a). 47. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255. and, as such, asserts a cause of action against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code. 48. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 being committed against the then minor Plaintiff by Defendant, Plaintiff has in the past suffered, and will in the future continue to suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress. psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment, loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy, separation from her family, and other damages associated with Defendant's manipulating and leading her into a perverse and unhealthy way of life. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses, and Plaintiff will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn 16 Podhurst Orsecic P.A. 25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800, Miami, FL 33130, Miami 305.3582800 Fax 305.358.2382 • Fort Lauderdale 954.463.4346 www.podhuist.cout EFTA01107204 Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2009 Page 17 of 27 income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature, and Plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, demands judgment against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for all damages available under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, including, without limitation, actual and compensatory damages, attorney's fees, costs of suit, and such other further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. COUNT FIVE (Cause of Action for Transportation with intent to Enzaze in Criminal Sexual Activity pursuant to 18 U.S.C. & 2255 in Violation of 18 U.S.C. & 24211 49. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, hereby adopts, repeats, realleges, and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 32 above. 50. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, knowingly transported, or attempted to transport, Plaintiff, Jane Doc No. 102, in interstate and/or foreign commerce, with the intent that Plaintiff engage in prostitution and/or in any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2421. As previously stated in paragraphs 20, 21, and 27, Defendant transported Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, across state lines and across international borders numerous times from the time that Plaintiff was merely 15 years old through adulthood with the primary intent of sexually exploiting her. 51. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255, and, as such, asserts a cause of action against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code. 52. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 being committed against the then minor Plaintiff by Defendant, Plaintiff has in the past suffered, and will in the future continue to suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, 17 Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Flagler Street Suite 800. Miami, FL 33130, Miami 305.358.2800 Fax 305358.2382 • Fort Lauderdale 954.4E3.4346 I www.podhuratcom EFTA01107205 Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2009 Page 18 of 27 psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment, loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy, separation from her family, and other damages associated with Defendant's manipulating and leading her into a perverse and unhealthy way of life for a minor. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses, and Plaintiff will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature, and Plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, demands judgment against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for all damages available under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, including, without limitation, actual and compensatory damages, attorney's fees, costs of suit, and such other further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. COUNT SIX (Cause of Action for Sexual Exploitation of Children pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 2255 in Violation of 18 U.S.C. $ 2251) 53. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, hereby adopts, repeats, rcalleges, and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 32 above. 54. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, knowingly persuaded, induced, enticed, or coerced the then minor Plaintiff to engage in sexually explicit conduct for the purpose of producing a visual depiction of such conduct, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251. As previously stated in paragraphs 14, 24, and 25, Defendant kept and displayed a myriad of nude photographs of underage girls throughout his homes, including his homes in New York City, Palm Beach, Santa Fe, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, saw photographs of naked young girls in each of Defendant's homes, including a photograph of herself naked at Defendant's home in Palm 18 Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800, Miami, FL 33130, Miami 305.358.2800 Fax 305.3582382 • Fort Lauderdak 954.463.4346 www.podhurstcom EFTA01107206 Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 0504/2009 Page 19 of 27 Beach. Upon information and belief, many of the photographs in the possession of Defendant were taken with hidden cameras set up in his home in Palm Beach. On the day of his arrest, police found two hidden cameras and photographs of underage girls on a computer in Defendant's home. Upon information and belief, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, may have taken lewd photographs of Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, with his hidden cameras and may have transported lewd photographs of Plaintiff (among many other victims) to his other residences and elsewhere using a facility or means of interstate and/or foreign commerce. Upon information and belief, one or more nude photographs of Plaintiff that were taken when she was a minor were confiscated by the Palm Beach Sheriff's Office during its execution of a search warrant of Defendant's Palm Beach mansion on October 20, 2005. Upon information and belief, those photographs are still in the custody of law enforcement. 55. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255, and, as such, asserts a cause of action against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code. 56. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 being committed against the then minor Plaintiff by Defendant, Plaintiff has in the past suffered, and will in the future continue to suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment, loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy, separation from her family, and other damages associated with Defendant's manipulating and leading her into a perverse and unhealthy way of life. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses, and Plaintiff will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn 19 Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 7, 5 Wee Flaolnr Stowe Snit. A00. Miami. R. ill n Miami 105 15R Mil Far 105 MA 71R? • Fort I andeniale 954 4fil 414A www reflahliMi rrim EFTA01107207 Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/0412009 Page 20 of 27 income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries arc permanent in nature, and Plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, demands judgment against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for all damages available under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, including, without limitation, actual and compensatory damages, attorney's fees, costs of suit, and such other further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. COUNT SEVEN (Cause of Action for Transport of Visual Depiction of Minor Enzaaing in Sexually Explicit Conduct pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 in Violation of 18 U.S.C. 4 2252(a)(111 57. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, hereby adopts, repeats, realleges, and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 32 above. 58. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, knowingly mailed, transported, shipped, or sent via computer and/or facsimile in or affecting interstate and/or foreign commerce at least one visual depiction of the minor Plaintiff engaging in sexually explicit conduct, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(1). As previously stated in paragraphs 14, 24, and 25, Defendant displayed a myriad of nude photographs of underage girls throughout his homes, including his homes in New York City, Palm Beach, Santa Fe, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, saw photographs of naked young girls in each of Defendant's homes, including a photograph of herself naked as a minor at Defendant's home in Palm Beach. As previously stated in paragraph 24, Defendant told Plaintiff that he had photographs of her naked in all of his homes. Upon information and belief, many of the photographs in the possession of Defendant were taken with hidden cameras set up throughout his home in Palm Beach. On the day of his arrest, police found two hidden cameras and nude photographs of underage girls on a computer in Defendant's home. Upon information and belief, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, may have taken lewd 20 Podhurst Orseck, P.A. IS Mac. 1.1 • akar cfre•ra Curl hn Pal MI Irrti Fl 1.111/1 l•fianli W. 1551 /AM) Pt,' 111; lra /11t7 • Fen. 1 twiarel2iA OSA s•rvut ru-,11.•••••• EFTA01107208 Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2009 Page 21 of 27 photographs of Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, with his hidden cameras and may have transported lewd photographs of Plaintiff (among many other victims) to his other residences and elsewhere using a facility or means of interstate and/or foreign commerce. Upon information and belief, one or more nude photographs of Plaintiff that were taken when she was a minor were confiscated by the Palm Beach Sheriff's Office during its execution of a search warrant of Defendant's Palm Beach mansion on October 20, 2005. Upon information and belief, those photographs are still in the custody of law enforcement. 59. As previously stated in paragraph 23, any assertions by Defendant that he was unaware of the age of the then minor Plaintiff are belied by his actions and rendered irrelevant by the provision of applicable federal and state statutes concerning the sexual exploitation and abuse of a minor child. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, at all times material to this cause of action, knew and should have known of Plaintiff's age of minority. Defendant's preference for underage girls was well-known to those who regularly procured them for him. 60. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255, and, as such, asserts a cause of action against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code. 61. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 being committed against the then minor Plaintiff by Defendant, Plaintiff has in the past suffered, and will in the future continue to suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment, loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy, separation from her family, and other damages associated with Defendant's manipulating and leading her into a perverse and unhealthy way of life. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses, and Plaintiff will in the future suffer additional medical and 21 Podhurst Orseck, PA. 25 West Flagler Street Suite 800, Miami, FL 33130, Miami 305.158.2800 Fax 305358.2182 • Fort Lauderdale 954.463.4346 www.podMirst.com EFTA01107209 Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2009 Page 22 of 27 psychological expenses. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature, and Plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, demands judgment against Defendant. Jeffrey Epstein, for all damages available under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, including, without limitation, actual and compensatory damages, attorney's fees, costs of suit, and such other further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. COUNT EIGHT (Cause of Action for Transport of Child Pornoeraphv pursuant to 18 U.S.C. & 2255 in Violation of 18 U.S.C. 4 2252Ma)(1)1 62. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, hereby adopts, repeats, realleges, and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 32 above. 63. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, knowingly mailed, transported, shipped, or sent via computer and/or facsimile in or affecting interstate and/or foreign commerce child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(1). 64. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255, and, as such, asserts a cause of action against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code. 65. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 being committed against the then minor Plaintiff by Defendant, Plaintiff has in the past suffered, and will in the future continue to suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment, loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy, separation from her family, and other damages associated with Defendant's manipulating and 22 Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Flagkr Street, Suite 800, Miami, FL 33130, Miami 305358.2800 Fax 305358.2382 • Fort Lauderdale 951.463.4346 www.poclhurstcom EFTA01107210 Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/0412009 Page 23 of 27 leading her into a perverse and unhealthy way of life. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses, and Plaintiff will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature, and Plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, demands judgment against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for all damages available under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, including, without limitation, actual and compensatory damages, attorney's fees, costs of suit, and such other further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. COUNT NINE (Cause of Action for Engaging in a Child Exploitation Enterprise pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 2255 in Violation of 18 U.S.C. & 2252M2)1 66. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, hereby adopts, repeats, realleges, and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 32 above and Counts One through Eight above. 67. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, knowingly engaged in a child exploitation enterprise, as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(gX2), in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(gX1). As more fully set forth above, Defendant engaged in actions that constitute countless violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1591 (sex trafficking of children), Chapter 110 (sexual exploitation of children in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2251, 2252(a)(1), and 2252(AXaX1)), and Chapter 117 (transportation for illegal sexual activity in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2421, 2422, and 2423). As more fully set forth above in paragraphs 9 through 32, Defendant's actions involved countless victims and countless separate incidents of sexual abuse, which he committed against minors, including Plaintiff, in concert with at least three other persons. 23 Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Hagler Street Suite 800, Miami, FL 33130, Miami 305.358.2800 Fax 3053582382 • Fort Lauderdale 954.163.4346 www.podhursteom EFTA01107211 Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2009 Page 24 of 27 68. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255, and, as such, asserts a cause of action against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code. 69. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 being committed against the then minor Plaintiff by Defendant, Plaintiff has in the past suffered, and will in the future continue to suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment, loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy, separation from her family, and other damages associated with Defendant's manipulating and leading her into a perverse and unhealthy way of life. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses, and Plaintiff will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature, and Plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, demands judgment against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for all damages available under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, including, without limitation, actual and compensatory damages, attorney's fees, costs of suit, and such other further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. Date: May 1, 2009 ktta Pirs44—art,-.6. _12 Kul E Robert C. Josefsbferg, Bar No. 0408503 Katherine W. Ezell, Bar No. 114771 Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800 Miami, Florida 33130 (305) 358-2800 (305) 358-2382 (fax) riosefsberia,podhurst.com 24 Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Flagler Street Suite SOO, Miami. FL 33130, Miami 305358.2300 Fax 305358.2382 • Fort Lauderdale 954.463.4346 I www.podlutratcont EFTA01107212 Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2009 Page 25 of 27 [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiff DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff demands to have her case tried before a jury. lioLtA i,•_14‘41C' Robert C. Joseftherg, Bar No. 040856 Katherine W. Ezell, Bar No. 114771 Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800 Miami, Florida 33130 (305) 358-2800 (305) 358-2382 (fax) rjosefsbergla.podhurst.com kezellapodhurst.com Attorneys for Plaintiff 25 Podhurst Ors. eck, P.A. 25 West Flagler Street. Suite 800, Miami, FL 33130, Miami 305358.2800 Fax 305.3582382 • Fort Lauderdale 954.463.4346 www.podhurst.com EFTA01107213 Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 0504.-2009 Page 26 of 27 *US 44 (Rev. 11/05) CIVIL COVER SHEET The JS 44 civil cover Shed and the information contained herein neither replace nor supplement the filing and Service of pleadinp. or dher papersas required by law, except as provided by load ivies of coun. This lona, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States i Seotanber 1974. is reamed for the use of the Ckrk of Court for the corneae of initiating the civil docket shed. (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON THE REVERSE OF THE FORM,) NOTICE: Attorneys MUST Indicate All Re-Bled Cases Below. I. (a) PLAINTIFFS Jane Doe No. 102 (b) County of Residence of First Listed Plaintiff West Palm Beach (EXCEPT IN US. PLAINTIFF CASES) (C) Attorney's (Elm Name. Address. std Telephone Noreen Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq./Katherine W. Ezell, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 W. Flagler St., Suite 800 Miami FI nun OR— C/ — 806S (0 Id) Check County Where Action Arose MI 5511 Dal)) Mon ROI II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION disc Jo (kit Box only 1-1 I IrS. Ginertunent rfl I Federal Question Plateau ICS Gosemment Not a Party) 0 2 U.S. lientounent Mien/Sim Sta 1 V)) 73 4 Dreamy (Inform Citizenship of Panics in hem III) • DEFENDANTS Jeffrey Epstein County of Residence of First Listed Defendant West Palm Beach (IN U.S. PLAINTIFECAS" CedLul NOTE: IN LAND CONDEMNATION (Vaal*JJ2 11'k LAND INVOLVED. ! INTAKE. +A TC Jack A. Goldberger, Esq., AtterburX Goldberger, et al.. 250 S. MAY 1 2009 , Australian Ave., 81400. West PalmiBeaeh eixp EFE0140. ,to rnobett D.0 O MARTIN O ST. LUCIE INDISCRTWF LAI EITIMICHCA HIGHLANDS Atlorneya of Known) D IS PALM BEACH dt.# III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIEStowe an -X- M Om Box for Plaintiff tFor DiserfflY OM" (k0 21 PTF DEE and One Box for Defatlant) PTF DEF. Cilium of ibis Star rr I Iniorporated oe Principal Fire of Badness In This State 1 4 14 Citizen of. nother Stale 0 2 O 2 Innumerated and Principal Place of BUSITC13 In Another State O 5 0 S Citizen or Subject of a 1 3 0 3 Foreissi Nation 0 6 0 6 Foreign Country I coAlAwri TO FORFEJTURE/PFNAITY imMatunrY OTHER STATUTES I 110 trauma 120 Marine 130 Milk, Act 140 Negotiable rostrums-Ili 150 Roar. try of Os dwayment a Enforcement of luddnent 151 Medicare Act 132 Recovery of Defaulted Student Loans (Excl. %terrain) 0 133 Recovery of Ovaparnero of %Mena &oaks 0 160 Stockholders' Stab 0 190 Other Contract 0 195 Contract Product Liability O 196 Franchise PERSONAL INJURY PERSONAL INJURY 0 310 Airplay 0 362 Personal Injury • 0 315 Abram* Prague, Med. Malpradiee Liability O 365 Personal Ingo - 0 320 Assault. Lad a Prod*, Liability Slander O 368 Asbestos PCISONI 71 Ile federal lintpdoyas* Inbay Padua Liability Ideality 0 340 Marine PERSONAL PROPERTY 0345 Maine Product 0 370 011er Fnm1 Liability 3 371 Taub in Leaded 0 350 Motor Vehick rt ISO Other Personal 0 153 Motor Vdticle Property Damage Product liability 0 385 Property Damage O 360 OtIrr Personal Product liability intact' 0 610 Agriculture 0 620 Other Runt R Drug 3 623 Drug Related Scirum of Property 21 IrSC 88 I 0 630 Liquor Laws 0 640 R R. & Truck 0 630 Airline Rep. 0 660 Occupational SafayiNealtb 3 690 Other 0 422 Appal U USC 158 fll 423 Withdrawal 28 USC 137 400 Slate Rappanionmem 410 ArdlINSI 430 Banks and Banking 430 Cotrantme 460 Detonation 470 Racketeer Influenced and Comp Organizations 480 Consumer Credit 4900'2:MS6i TV 810 Sekctive Service 850 Seaga iesCommoditiew Exchanr 875 Customer Chilkmir 12 USE 3410 Maher Statutory Actions 891 Agricultural Acts 892 Economic Stabilisation ACI 893 Emironmental Manus 894 Energy Allocation Ad 895 Freedom of Infonnaneo Act 91)0Appeal of Foe Dmenntremon Lida Equal ACcess toJustice 0 930 Coaninutonality of State Statutes Miii:Itle All irtliti: In 3 730 Coppices 1 830 Patent CI 840 Trademark LADOR SOCIAL SECURITY 0 710 Fanlab& Standards Act 0 720 Labor Mgmt Relations 0 730 LaborMgmLitcponing St Disclosure Act 0 740 Rahway Labor Act 0 790 Onlyr Lahr Litigation 0 791 Tirpt Refine Securn) Act 0 861 DIA11393M 0 862 Black Lune (923) 0 863 DIWCIDIWW (405(p)) 0 864 SSW Title Zvi 0 865 RSI (405(g1) FEDERAL TAX SUITS I REAL PROPERTY CIVIL RIGHTS PRISONER PETITIONS 0 870 fates (VS. Plaintiff or Delon:Ural O 871 IRS-third Party 26 USC 7600 0 210 lad Coulcinnation 0 220 Foreclosure 0 230 Rent Lose tb ESMIllai 0 240 Tons to I amt O 245 Ton Product Liability O 290 All Other Real Property 0 441 Voting 0 442 Employment 0 443 Housing, A0:01111110611005 0 444 Welfart 3 445 Amer. wiDitabilitits - Earoyinem 3 446 Amer. *Inabilities - Other 3 440 Other Civil Rights 1 510 /dm ion to Vacate Sentence Habeas Corpus:. 1 530 General 1 535 Death Penalty 1 340 Mandamus & Other 0 550 Civil Rights 0 353 Prism Condition V. ORIGIN vi I Original P (Place a -X" in One Boa Only) 0 2 Removed from CI 3 Ro-filed- 0 4 Reinstated or O 5 amour Trans errdiaseiaed from 0 6 Multidistrict St to Court ,see VI below) (namesy) Litigation Appeal to District CI JiAge from ' Magistrate lodgment VI. RELATED/RE-FILED CASE(S). (See isubvaions leCeel Pate): a) Re-filed Case 0 YES 0 NO JUDGE Kenneth A. Marta b) Related Cases OYES CI NO DOCKET See Attached NUMBER VII. CAUSE OF ACTION Cie the U.S. Civil Statute under which you are filing and Write a Brief Statement of Cause (Do Dot cite jurisdictional statutes 13 IlltS1 amenity): 18 U.S.C. 2255 (Predicate Statutes 18 U.S.C. 2422(b). 2423(b). 2423(e), 2251, 2252. 2252A(a)( I), 2252A(g)( 1) LENGTH OF TRIAL via 4 days estimated (for both sides to try entire rase/ O CHECK IF THIS IS A CLASS ACTION UNDER ER.C.F. 23 VIII. REQUESTED IN COMPLAINT: DEMAND S CHECK YES only if demanded n complaint JURY DEMAND: Pi Yea IS No ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE & CORRECT TO TIIE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE SIO TUREOIAITORNET OF RICO FtEriLt_ DATE R OIFICE USE my, &moue Si) RECEIPTSrizetk32) DC1O I /4.3(7 EFTA01107214 Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2009 Page 27 of 27 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTIIERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION ATTACHMENT TO CIVIL COVER SHEET FOR: Jane Doe 10tv. Jeffrey Epstein VI: RELATED/RE-FIELD CASE(S): 08-80069 08-80119 08-80232 08-80380 08-80381 08-08804 08-80811 08-80893 08-80993 08-80994 08-80469 09-80591 EFTA01107215