Case File
efta-efta01111276DOJ Data Set 9OtherUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta01111276
Pages
4
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Fort Lauderdale Division
IN RE:
ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.A.
Debtor.
CASE NO. 09-3479I-BKC-RBR
CHAPTER 11
JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RENEWED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF ORDER
GRANTING LEAVE TO DEPOSE SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN AND FOR AN
ORDER RE-CERTIFYING TO THE DISTRICT COURT THE NEED
FOR MORE TIME TO DEPOSE SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN
COMES NOW, Interested Party Jeffrey Epstein, by and through his undersigned counsel,
and hereby files his Renewed Motion for the entry of an Order granting Jeffrey Epstein leave to
depose SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN. The grounds for this Motion are as follows:
1.
On June 2, 2011, this Court entered its Agreed Order Granting, In Part: The
Motion of Trustee Herbert Stetting to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testlficandum (D.E.
1595); Gibraltar Private Bank & Trust's Motion for Leave to Depose Scott Rothstein and for
Certification to District Court for Issuance of Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum (D.E.
1660); and Razorback Creditors' Motion for issuance of Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad
Testlficanduni to Depose Scott W. Rothstein in State Court Litigation [D.E. 1685) and
Establishing Protocol for Examination and Deposition (the "Rothstein Deposition Protocol
Order") [D.E. 1751].
2.
Paragraph 2 of the Rothstein Deposition Protocol Order states, inter alia, that
"[a]ll parties who have not as of the date of this Order secured permission to depose [Scott]
Rothstein and who wish to take his deposition shall: a) secure from the court in which the
litigation is pending an order granting leave to depose Rothstein..."
EFTA01111276
Case No. 09-34791-BKC-RBR
3.
On or about December 7, 2009, Jeffrey Epstein commenced litigation against
SCOTT ROTHSTEIN and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS for damages. A copy of the Corrected
Second Amended Complaint is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 1. A
review of the Exhibit demonstrates the need for ROTHSTEIN's deposition in this case.
4.
Pursuant to the Rothstein Deposition Protocol Order, Jeffrey Epstein seeks the
entry of an Order granting leave to depose SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN.
5.
At a hearing on this matter held on December 9, 2011, the Court denied without
prejudice Jeffrey Epstein's Motion [DE 2511] because it was determined that the scheduled
Rothstein depositions were filled to capacity. The Court stated it would re-certify the need for
further depositions of Rothstein.
6.
Jeffrey Epstein renews his Motion to Depose Scott Rothstein. J. Epstein has
already provided the U.S. Attorney the requested information for security screening.
7.
Undersigned counsel, Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr., certifies that prior to filing this
Motion, he contacted Charles Lichtman, attorney for the Trustee. The Trustee does not object to
this Motion as long as the timing does not interfere with the Trustee's need to depose Mr.
Rothstein in certain pending adversary proceedings.
WHEREFORE, for the reasons set forth above, Jeffrey Epstein respectfully requests that
this Court enter an Order granting leave to depose SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN and to re-certify to
the District Court the need for more time to depose SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that I am admitted to the Bar of the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida, and I am in compliance with the additional qualifications to
practice in this Court set forth in Local Rule 2090-1(A).
2
EFTA01111277
Case No. 09-34791-BKC-RBR
DATED: January 11, 2012.
Respectfully submitted,
s/John S. Graham
John S. Graham
Florida Bar No. 52147
Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr.
Florida Bar 1%Ic
1
FOWLER WHITE BURNETT, M.
Counsel for Jeffrey Epstein
901 Phillips Point West
777 South Hagler Drive
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
Telephone:
Facsimile:
3
EFTA01111278
Case No. 09-34791-BKC-RBR
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on January 11, 2012, I electronically filed the foregoing
document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document
is being served this day on all electronic notice parties by CM/ECF and by U.S. Mail to: Jack
Scarola, Esq., Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd.,
West Palm Beach, FL 33409; Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq., Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.,
250 Australian Ave. South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012; and Marc S. Nurik,
Esq., Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik, One East Broward Blvd., Suite 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL
33301.
s/John S. Graham
John S. Graham, Esq.
4
EFTA01111279
Technical Artifacts (4)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Phone
401-5012SWIFT/BIC
DISTRICTSWIFT/BIC
SOUTHERNWire Ref
referenceRelated Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH
45p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
14p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
07/29/2011 14:05 FAX 5616845816
9p
Court UnsealedSep 9, 2019
Epstein Depositions
10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps
839p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
Fowler White Burnett
1p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA00020703
0p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.