Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta01111280DOJ Data Set 9Other

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta01111280
Pages
4
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. 502009CA040800X3OOCMBAG Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and ■., individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO USE DOCUMENTS PRODUCED UNDER CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, files this his Motion for Leave of Court to use certain documents which are not privileged, which were produced under a Confidentiality Agreement by the Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards"). The grounds for this motion are as follows: I. On or about February 23, 2011, Edwards produced documents under a Confidentiality Agreement. The production was in two parts. The first documents, were labeled for review by attorney's only. ("Attorney's Eyes Only"). The Second set of documents, were labeled irrelevant, but could be reviewed by Epstein ("Irrelevant"). Under the Agreement, if Epstein's counsel believes the documents were either not privileged or relevant, leave of court would be sought prior to disclosure. FOWLER WHTTE BURNETT P.A. • 901 PHILLIPS POINT WEST. 777 sount FLAGLER DRIVE. WEST PALM BEACH. FLORIDA 33901 • EFTA01111280 Jeffrey Epstein v Scott Rothstein, et al. CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Epstein's M/Leave to Use Docs produced under Confid. Agreement 2. Counsel for Epstein believes the following documents which are being submitted in-camera to this Court for review, are either not privileged and/or are relevant below and show the following: (1) Meetings related to the Non-Prosecution Agreement, which had nothing to do with the Edwards' victims claims and contain no confidential information; (2) Memos demonstrating intent to try and force Epstein to settle and specifically going after the people close to him. These memos are not protected by any privilege; (3) Using Q-Tasks for the Epstein matters. These documents are not privileged and are needed for future discovery requests; (4) Using media to feature Edwards' firm regarding the Epstein case for the purpose of attracting investors. No confidential information involved in this document; (5) Lack of good faith basis for a motion filed in federal court to freeze Epstein assets pre-judgment was denied. No privilege involved; (6) Serving subpoena for Epstein medical and prescription records, when no issue of Epstein's health was in the case. No applicable privilege exists; Numerous emails scheduling meetings with Edwards and many of the lawyers in Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler, P.A. ("RRA"), including Scott Rothstein ("Rothstein"), contrary to Edwards' deposition testimony. Documents contain no confidential communications and are merely evidence of the meetings; -2 FOWLER WHITE BURNETT. • 901 PHILLIPS POINT WEST. 777 SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE. WEST PALM BEACH. FLORIDA 33401 EFTA01111281 Jeffrey Epstein v Scott Rothstein, et al. CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Epstein's M/Leave to Use Docs produced under Confid. Agreement (8) Email demonstrating Edwards knowledge of recording devices in firm including for speaker phone conversations, Not privileged and possible violation of Florida Criminal Statute relating to wire-taps; (9) Email demonstrating contacts with U.S. Attorney's Office for the purpose of interfering with the Non-Prosecution Agreement. It is not privileged because it is a communication with a third party; (10) Efforts to depose Donald Trump, a friend of Epstein who had no knowledge of the case and Alan Dershowitz, one of Epstein's criminal lawyers in the victim cases also without any knowledge of the case in furtherance of the purpose of going after those close to Epstein. No privilege information involved; (11) Emails by and between Rothstein and A.J. Discala ("Discala"), and other investors showing the need to conclude the receipt of investor monies on Epstein cases so that Rothstein does not lose his Epstein Plaintiffs to other lawyers and so that one Epstein Plaintiff does not report him to The Florida Bar. These are communications with third parties and involve no privilege. 3. These documents were produced under a Confidentiality Agreement and are not identified on the Privilege Log. A simple review of the documents will clearly show that it contains no attorney-client communication and no work product information that relates to an attorney's thoughts or strategies. The emails do contain evidence of the Rothstein's firm to use other extra-judicial or inappropriate judicial means to further the advancement of the Ponzi scheme and thus are not privileged. - 3 - FOWLER WHTTE BURNETT P.A. • 901 PHILLIPS POINT WEST. 777 sount FLAGLER DRIVE. WEST PALM BEACH. FLORIDA 33401 EFTA01111282 Jeffrey Epstein v Scott Rothstein, et al. CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Epstein's M/Leave to Use Docs produced under Confid. Agreement WHEREFORE, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, respectfully requests that this Court review these emails and enter an Order granting permission for Epstein to use these emails and release them from the provisions of the Confidentiality Agreement. I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was emailed and mailed this day of July, 2011 to: Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. P.O. Drawer 3626 West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 Respectfully submitted, Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr. Fla. Bar No. 235954 Email: FOWLER WHITE BURNETT, P.A. 901 Phillips Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Telephone: Facsimile: Attorneys Jeffrey Epstein WASO743).MOTION374.1olion for Leave to Use Does Produced Under Confid. Agreemen1.1LA.ducx - 4 - FOWLER WHOM BURNETT P.A. • 901 PHILLIPS POINT WEST. 777 sount FLAGLER DRIVE. WEST PALM BEACH. FLORIDA 33401 EFTA01111283

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone401-5012

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

DS9 Document EFTA01100999

39p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01657711

27p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01657683

28p
House OversightFBI ReportNov 11, 2025

[REDACTED - Survivor] interview implicates Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew and other high‑profile figures in alleged und...

The transcript provides first‑hand allegations linking Epstein and Maxwell to a network that allegedly included Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, Les Wexner, Alan Dershowitz and other powerful individuals. Roberts says she was recruited at age 15 by Ghislaine Maxwell to work for Epstein after meeting him Describes a concealed ‘secret room’ in Epstein’s mansion filled with pornographic photographs. Cla

29p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 291-15 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/21/2015 Page 1 of

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 291-15 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/21/2015 Page 1 of 40 EXHIBIT 16 EFTA00081180 Case 9:08-cv-807m091349pept Z91-15 _EriterM ocp WERocisstifolf/E15 Page 2 of roio-< uoc 16q0,3 e 0 EXHIBIT C Epstein vs. Edwards Undisputed Statement of Facts EFTA00081181 Case 9:08-cv-807ailaVs kigsyffigt 28415-c1p6Arger phri N 7NRocieatgfe)10/§815 Page 3 of IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Case No.: 50 2009 CA 040800XXXKMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, VS. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY I EDWARDS, individually, Defendants, STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS Defendant Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., offers the following specific facts as the undisputed material facts in this case. Each of the following facts is numbered separately and individually to facilitate Epstein's required compliance with Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.510(c) ("The adverse party shall identify . . . any summary judgment evidence on wh

40p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01657683

0p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.