Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta01115327DOJ Data Set 9Other

Calkatnd EUSei 16(<

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta01115327
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Calkatnd EUSei 16(< FINANCE & ECONOMICS 4/28 .2„13 Public and Private Sector Payroll Jobs: Bush and Obama by Bill McBride With public sector jobs down over the last several years (Federal, State and local layoffs), several readers have asked if I could update the graphs comparing public and private sector job losses (or added) for President George W. Bush's two terms (following the stock market bust), and for President Obama tenure in office so far (following the housing bust and financial crisis). Important: There are many differences between the two periods. Both followed the bursting of a bubble (stock and housing), although the housing bust also led to a severe financial crisis. The first graph shows the change in private sector payroll jobs from when Mr. Bush took office (January 2001) compared to Mr. Obama's tenure (from January 2009). Mr. Bush (red) took office following the bursting of the stock market bubble, and left during the bursting of the housing bubble. Mr Obama (blue) took office during the financial crisis and great recession. Private Sector Payroll Jobs —G.W. Bush —Obama Is 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 LOCO 0 k -1,000 o. ≥ -2.000 V -3,000 a -4,000 -5,000 0 12 24 64 41 60 http://matakulatodrIsItlag.com/ 72 14 ss Page I 1 of 2 EFTA01115327 The employment recovery during Mr. Bush's first term was very sluggish, and private employment was down 946,000 jobs at the end of his first term. At the end of Mr. Bush's second term, private employment was collapsing, and there were net 665,000 jobs lost during Mr. Bush's two terms. The recovery has been sluggish under Mr. Obama's presidency too, and there were only 1,933,000 more private sector jobs at the end of Mr. Obama's first term. A couple of months into Mr. Obama's second term, there are now 2,282,000 more private sector jobs than when he took office. A big difference between Mr. Bush's tenure in office and Mr. Obama's presidency has been public sector employment. The public sector grew during Mr. Bush's term (up 1,748,000 jobs), but the public sector has declined since Obama took office (down 718,000 jobs). These job losses have mostly been at the state and local level, but they are still a significant drag on overall employment. Public Sector Payroll lobs —GM. Bush —Obama 2.000 1.500 i 1.000 -75 1 -1.000 httpd/vemmealculatedriskblog.tom/ Another important difference: I started warning about the housing bubble in 2004, and I started this blog in January 2005 - the beginning of Mr. Bush's 2nd term. My focus in 2005 was on the housing bubble and coming recession. Now - at a similar point in Mr. Obama's tenure - I expect the economy to continue to expand, so I don't expect a sharp decline in employment as happened at the end of Mr. Bush's 2nd term. Page 12 of 2 EFTA01115328

Technical Artifacts (2)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domainmatakulatodrisitlag.com
URLhttp://matakulatodrIsItlag.com

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.