Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta01120060DOJ Data Set 9Other

El WEST PALM BEACH (*Arr.

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta01120060
Pages
6
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
El WEST PALM BEACH (*Arr. 2139 PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD. WEST PALM BEACH. FLORIDA 33409 P.O. BOX 3826 WEST PALM BEACH. FLORIDA 33402 %zenith ATTORNEYS AT LAW ROSALYN SA DAM 0-11ARNES H. GREGORY BAR WART T HARDEE BASS. Ill LAME J. BR GGGS BRAN R pNAY BRENDA S. FULAIER MARIANO GARCIA JAMES W. GUSTAFSON. JR. JACK P PILL DAVID X. KELLEY. ARLAN KNOT DARRYL L. Lnyis' 'WILLIAM A.NORTON PATO L. DONLAN' (OHMIC V RICCI SCAROLA 'CHRISTIAN 0. SEARCY 'JOHN A. SINTTLEY CHRISTOPHER K. SPEED" BRIAN F. SULLIVAN''' KAREN LTERRY T. CALVIN WARRINER It CCKAASA 'CARL L DCINEY. SHAREHOLDERS *HOARD CEITPPIED arcommnru 'KENTUCKY MAINE IAARY LAM 'Lusaka-Winn; 1ms-sissy', G REW HAMPSIRRE T TO- JERSEY VIRGIN% . WASTINGICA DC PARALEGALS. VNLANAYNK•E.ECIA RANCH V. DUFRESNE DAVID W GILMORE ADTPT C MORIONS DANA B 'MEM DEBORAH IA 10MAP VACE•47 L LEONARD.A. JADES PETER LOVE ROBERT W PITCHER MARK P PORGY KMITLEETI SIMON SIEVE M. WITH BONNE S STARK WALTER A. STEN SEARCY DENNEY SCAROLA BARN HART iw--SH I PLEYA VIA EMAIL AND U.S. MAIL September 14, 2011 Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire Christopher Knight, Esquire Fowler White Burnett, P.A. 901 Phillips Point West 777 S Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Re: Edwards adv. Epstein Our File No.: 291874 Gentlemen: OTALLAHASSEE ()Mex. THE TOWLE HOUSE 517 NORTH CALHOUN STREET TALLAHASSEE. FL 32301.1231 PO. BOX 1230 TALLAHASSEE. FLORIDA 32302 Pursuant to Section 57.105(4), Fla. Stat., you are hereby notified that we will be filing the enclosed Motion of Defendant/Counterplaintiff, Bradley J. Edwards, for Attorney's Fees pursuant to Florida Statute §57.105 unless, within twenty-one (21) days after service of this letter, you voluntarily withdraw your Section 57.105 Notice of September 2, 2011 in Case No. 502009CA040800)OOO3M, Division AG in the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida. Section 57.105 provides for the award of attorney's fees against both a party and that party's attorney. It is our position that your Notice is not supported by the material facts and/or the application of existing law to those facts, as set forth in the enclosed motion. Your assertion that Mr. Edwards' Counterclaim which has survived various attacks by you is somehow without legal and factual support is contradicted by all of the arguments and evidence detailed in our pending Motion for Summary Judgment. But even clearer contradiction is found in the fact that at the very same time you are threatening a,sr-Ots. WWWSEAR CVLAW.COM EFTA01120060 Joseph L. Ackerman, Esquire Christopher Knight, Esquire Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. Edwards adv. Epstein September 14, 2011 Page 2 to have us sanctioned for prosecuting a spurious claim, you are offering to settle that claim by paying hundreds of thousands of dollars. Please be advised that we will therefore file the enclosed Motion for Attorney's Fees pursuant to §57.105, Fla. Stat., with the trial court, in accordance with the requirements of Section 57.105, if you do not voluntarily withdraw your baseless motion within 21 days. Please govern yourself accordingly. SCAROLA mep nc. cc: Bradley J. Edwards, Esquire EFTA01120061 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIF [LENIN JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800)OOOCMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, PlaintiffIs), vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M., individually, Defendant(s). DRAFT DEFENDANT/COUNTERPLAINTIFF, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS' MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES PURSUANT TO FLA. STAT. O7.105 Defendant/Counterplaintiff, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, by and through his undersigned counsel, respectfully moves this Court, pursuant to §57.105, Fla. Stat., for an award of reasonable attorney's fees incurred in defending PlaintifUCounterdefendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S Motion for Attorney's Fees Pursuant to Fla. Stat. §57.105, and in support thereof states as follows: 1. Section 57.105 provides, in relevant part: (1) Upon the court's initiative or motion of any party, the court shall award a reasonable attorney's fee to be paid to the prevailing party in equal amounts by the losing party and the losing party's attorney on any claim or defense at any time during a civil proceeding or action in which the court finds that the losing party or the losing party's attorney knew or should have known that a claim or defense when initially presented to the court or at any time before trial: EFTA01120062 Edwards adv. Epstein Edwards' Motion for Attorney's Fees Pursuant to 57.105 Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG (a) Was not supported by the material facts necessary to establish the claim or defense; or (b) material facts. Would not be supported by the application of then-existing law to those 2. The amendments to §57.105, Fla. Stat. expanded the scope of the statute to apply to any claim or defense. See Boca Burger, Inc. v. Forum, 912 So.2d 561 (Fla. 2005). 3. Pursuant to §57.105, Fla. Stat., attorney's fees may be awarded if the party or its counsel knew or should have known that the claim or defense asserted was not supported by the facts or an application of then-existing law. See, e.g., Read v. Taylor, 832 So.2d 219 (Fla. 4 DCA 2002). 4. On or about September 2, 2011, EPSTEIN filed a Notice of Intent to File a F.S. §57.105 motion seeking to sanction EDWARDS and his counsel for the prosecution of EDWARDS' Counterclaim against EPSTEIN. The assertion that the Counterclaim lacked factual and legal support is clearly spurious in light of the factual and legal support detailed in EDWARDS' pending Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion to Assert Claim for Punitive Damages. Moreover, at the very same time that EPSTEIN takes the position in his §57.105 motion that EDWARDS' claim is baseless; he has filed a Proposal for Settlement offering to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars to settle that same claim. WHEREFORE, Defendant/Counterplaintiff, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, respectfully requests that his Motion for Attorney's Fees Pursuant to §57.105, Fla. Stat., be granted and that this Court grant such other and further relief as deemed necessary and proper. 2 EFTA01120063 Edwards adv. Epstein Edwards' Motion for Attorney's Fees Pursuant to 57.105 Case No.: 502009CA0408007OOO/MBAG I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this 2011. Jack S Flori No.: 169440 S enney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley 2 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard est Palm Beach Florida 33409 Phone: Fax: Attorney for BRADLEY J. EDWARDS 3 EFTA01120064 Edwards adv. Epstein Edwards' Motion for Attorney's Fees Pursuant to 57.105 Case No.: 502009CA040800)OOOCM13AG COUNSEL LIST Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. Attorney For: Jeffrey Epstein 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: Fax: Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, PL Attorney For: Jeffrey Epstein 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: Fax: Marc S. Nurik, Esquire Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik Attorney For: Scott Rothstein One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale. FL 33301 Phone: Fax: Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire Fowler White Burnett, P.A. Attorney For: Jeffrey Epstein 901 Phillips Point West 777 S Flagler Drive West Palm Beach. FL 33401-6170 Phone: Fax: 4 EFTA01120065

Technical Artifacts (3)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domaincvlaw.com
Phone301.1231
Phone401-6170

Related Documents (6)

House OversightDepositionNov 11, 2025

Deposition Transcript of Bradley J. Edwards in Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein Litigation (Palm Beach, FL)

The document provides a formal deposition record linking Jeffrey Epstein to a civil case against Scott Rothstein and other defendants, confirming the existence of litigation and identifying attorneys Deposition taken on March 23, 2010 in a case titled Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Identifies plaintiff’s counsel Robert D. Critton, Jr. and defendant’s counsel Jack Alan Goldberger

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Order documents from our nationwide document retrieval service.

Order documents from our nationwide document retrieval service. - OR - Call 1.866.540.8818. Florida Circuit & County Courts FL Circuit & County - Palm Beach (Palm Beach) 502008CA005240XXXXMB Cma, I. Epstein, Jeffrey et al The case was last updated by the court on Friday, October 22, 2010 Header Case Number: 502008CA005240XXXXMB Date Filed: 02/21/2008 Date Full Case Retrieved: 10/22/2010 Status: Pending Misc: (180) OTHER CIRCUIT; Circuit Civil [Summary][Additional Case Information][Participants][Additional Counsel][Calendar][Fees][Proceedings] Summary Judge: FIAFELE, JUDGE DONALD W Back to Too Additional Case Information Clerk Case Number: 2008ca005240 Outstanding Warrant/Summon/Capias: Y Jury Trial: J Closed Case: N Last Docket Date: 04/20/2009 Status Date: 04/20/2009 Back to Too Participants Litigant Cma, Plaintiff Epstein, Jeffrey Defendant Kellen. Sarah Defendant Attorney Willits. Richard H 2290 10th Ave N Suite 404 Lake Worth FL 33461 Back to To

69p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Counsel list filing for Jeffrey Epstein case (House Oversight document)

The document only provides attorney contact information and a case number for a filing related to Jeffrey Epstein. It contains no substantive allegations, financial details, or connections to high‑lev Case number: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Multiple law firms listed as counsel for Jeffrey Epstein Filing appears to be a notice of supplement in a court proceeding

1p
House OversightFBI ReportNov 11, 2025

[REDACTED - Survivor] interview implicates Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew and other high‑profile figures in alleged und...

The transcript provides first‑hand allegations linking Epstein and Maxwell to a network that allegedly included Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, Les Wexner, Alan Dershowitz and other powerful individuals. Roberts says she was recruited at age 15 by Ghislaine Maxwell to work for Epstein after meeting him Describes a concealed ‘secret room’ in Epstein’s mansion filled with pornographic photographs. Cla

29p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 291-15 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/21/2015 Page 1 of

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 291-15 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/21/2015 Page 1 of 40 EXHIBIT 16 EFTA00081180 Case 9:08-cv-807m091349pept Z91-15 _EriterM ocp WERocisstifolf/E15 Page 2 of roio-< uoc 16q0,3 e 0 EXHIBIT C Epstein vs. Edwards Undisputed Statement of Facts EFTA00081181 Case 9:08-cv-807ailaVs kigsyffigt 28415-c1p6Arger phri N 7NRocieatgfe)10/§815 Page 3 of IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Case No.: 50 2009 CA 040800XXXKMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, VS. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY I EDWARDS, individually, Defendants, STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS Defendant Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., offers the following specific facts as the undisputed material facts in this case. Each of the following facts is numbered separately and individually to facilitate Epstein's required compliance with Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.510(c) ("The adverse party shall identify . . . any summary judgment evidence on wh

40p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Attorney Bradley Edwards alleges Jeffrey Epstein's non‑prosecution agreement, 5th Amendment tactics, and a unique George Rush tape as key evidence ...

The affidavit details a non‑prosecution agreement that shielded Epstein from federal charges, claims that Epstein repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment to block discovery, and describes a purportedly Epstein secured a federal non‑prosecution agreement that barred criminal charges for ~30 victims in All co‑defendants and Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment, leaving plaintiffs with no substantive

23p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.