November 4, 200$

November 4, 200$ SITRICIS. AND COMPANY INC. ttesucanss -Nate= Roy Block Vag. oar Dear Roy: This fl y, when Kann by you blow oa behalf of leflley Epsom (the •Clleati odd accepted by Rink Srebniek, Kampen & Snout ('Attorsar), will constitute the unman with mann to the coenemeal of Sinn And Company fee. a Calibraia amp:salon CSItrIele) so =pone cooveunkatiors advisee. specialist and non-dmigrinted open tanultam, with respect to any legal note Anton fa heridlioe br Cent n she following amts and condemns: 1. The Claw cad Ationey, eilicliee es of Celebn 21, 2005. have rotund Slide:etc provide advice and antic relations saviors in cannon with legal have It k kandlins. 2. Sind will waive fa annoy ren.refundabk retsina of 540,000 o a °Inma, menu& fn. hi Hat thereat; Company dud pay Shtick a noo-terendabk swain of 1,30.000 as a minimum, annual ft. Sitrack's ore chews nil be billed nano itt retainer al the hourly rote range of $165 &mai:Igen :he parson poinsrms the servitem paraptufuteuestisuituant time is billed st S55.00 ran hour. What the tatttinn bas but applied slIshwl bac cbareu. additional time darns in any year will d billed n interred and an rnyAble with's; navy days afta recant. Chats% an computed on a portal-toponsl basis foe any trawal time for meetly held outside of Sinitic's *noes. Tnc is billed by Shuck u ICLOCINCYCS Of oneiturst of ac how. La addition, we custonsuily =ton a 'bans ke if we bellow we have performed antes fora client which result in aignIfent benefits to the cunt beyond dose we believe a Atonal public naltaions Orin could achieve. Obviously. we would sit don and discus; en ouch proposed foe with you If in believe it is nomad. IS such be wind be subject to your appnwel. Please review.our trills each morn unto receipt. tf you On any question plow fed free to call. However, urine you nuke tome pram to Shriek In wnting within twenty days of receipt of the bill, it will be pretund you have no obeclioro to it end epee to the reasonableness oldie bill. 3. The Chat del reimburse Shriek Main meaty bye of invoice date fanny ad all at of pocka con and Opeosea bound by Sitrick in centirolon with Its engoptment 11.0 ct..,, ....00 .,%wit.210 •Pst Page 1 EFTA01121316 Scott KornSpeoSIAck,AL,_ aga 21 Normbos, 2005 UTRYCK AND COMPANY INC, Ø9910/11:41 benonder, includin vridet lirdelim, hel enes, modem« tosti, bong (filliaCt photocopy Matua and aha oal-of-pocket com and troendes. Reanbursabk east om not appiied sgainy: tbc ideer and tydl bo lodled mamk/ by blirkit. 4. Silrkk acknowledges thai Is seren bes pedal pnuent to this Irer no ment n for the borefil eken ed thart Anarney, w Clienrs oxel, gall oul be reptetble fo, an le, emu or expeoses inetrred io cor.oectim tiribh Sades satt 5. &hick AM Comprny's 'mango-lent Imentex my be termionted Weitber paily a, 30 din prior eden nOtiCe. All proviiiens of dyk eter Molns to the myntan of fcer end aperturs and ioderelkodon vill eye any ter0/01100/1 or the enormt by eke peny, All the provision of Ibit lotter ronexd la pirogrophs 4. 5. 6 and 7 avin amin for a pxiod of bro yran following the dan of *ny termlintion of the ensaganeal by either party. 6. In do evrnl cny <eke of Siirlek, a my 1411e is tennind or remented lY parucipric or remi& tentimony, demenonta or aber ealdonce in my nØn. 411Otralion CC other poeten Malins dandy or inta:cc/ly. to oir enusoment. Enbet or rot mer engagement hes been namnet dm Client Del pay Sarick for the te neon In penning-kr and pulvret Mab parricipotion or testimony. nl Sinich thai mode halling ran, and for my nona and tweas, Melodins Manen fm. inmotad in cortmaxim Manet. 7. .Obst ave to indemnify end bold tumlett Sittlek, irs Marcheenr offieers, duplo, entployea ord asen (asch peb encity or peson bes tefund bre 'intleninIned Panna, from and agning isny ed ell beses, eke ten liabilitie cent and experten fineludiny, ban r( liieixd to, rettvable romgys fe) exharry Indermified Person any be teet to or blarr in reamodon wish the tenvien moderod by Stick to Client and/ox Anomey. This nerrunnit stoll w oppy lo on adr kam ekons, denn, liabiallied tons w trema of cay Indemnifi d Person dal ve Penny determined lo have mule fen Sker: or sunt other ledentified Paros's rom rulle« w ?MALI mienduer, 8. Lut of tha pankt baeto alpen to kem this letter asmement, and tha termo end Ixreot Melodin; biting natemeds and tie altars, artad)/ conftderahal egot nnly se ny be necnlaiy to enforte 100 kror. Al communkations. 000100000cracc. ifilkumaYs ond a/riktigs been Sitrick edd Alme? Mall be dismad to corathuit attorney we•prodain and 04icneme prated by tho nuomonlicat pivdne. Esch of the parties egen not to solkit for et rployment, nor anploy. my ernpinyte of dm ohm durhyr tbc prelins of Sitrickt engagement and fora pedal of hvo yen Viceallor. 9. An ave not old to Skria purtutint lo thIc Gafttlikti within ten dop we duc Mall ban eden at the nie of ler parant per onatur,. if action be oommenced to enfant *ny 2 040 Cennuy P 1••••• • • 96 • I A i).E. TT..< 90:67 :MY • re... a) ”7.7.799 EFTA01121317 Scott Kom,s2an • RRItleck.ady sumac AND COMPANY INC ta MLF ty taYtaot November 4, 2005 proviricui of Ibis Mier agreement, the enviable pony shell be emitkd lo reasonable inorney feu. My COnIZOW rry, claim or dispute rebuke no Ibis loner nerecixar Abell bo resolved by binding re-bin-a:ion io anon:knee with the rules of the Ammad Arbitration Association pursuant w an arbitration randkind in Lai Angeles Comfy, CallfOrMå lodgment upon such arbitration may be catered in any cowl avios jutadicuss Kato( This lame ngrttment daft be interpreted and cgisi ix/1 in men/ante with the substannve brae of the State of Callihan' aggitatde to nelniets urode =Hobe pertonned Merck. Arced to add accepted this " &ri d Pitivfot6er "Moony" Very Holy your. brick ulk Clubman mad Oder Davin Officer COessolloChest Stya ,P444 Kuv..„ 4~±5 el.4-0 ;^) Piefrker •P' 0. leak, tich n. €44-, IC 4.4srps-. 3 Itto • St Oner. EFTA01121318 [Scott Korptipan - RoyBlack.pdf _ Page 41 Nomabor 1, 2005 MYRICK AND CQMPANY INC. Ia AMBIT • /111 / Hoy Black, krq Black, Srebneck. Korn:pan& Stumpf 201 3. Blicayne B1, 8:300 Muted. 01. 33/31 Re: /slimy Ectrusio INVOICE Helaine, for me period beginning: TOTAL DUE -035.000.00 Plaue win wand« Runde io: CITY NATIONAL BANK CREDIT ACCOUNT OP: &TUG( AND COMPANY ABA ROUTING NO.: 122 016 066 CREDIT ACCOUNT NO.t 112204510 ATTN: DAVE NATHAN or Plow mnkc check ~No la STUCK AND COMPANY INC. IMO ~Hy Pork FAN. Sake 800 4 II* Croy IOU • Leta Am*. CA t ).110. 14:« pie) ?S9» EFTA01121319 From. Darren Indyke Subject: Confidential Date: March 7, •" To: Mike Sitrick At JE's request I am forwarding contact info from he forowing reporters who have contacted Jeffrey's Lawyer's over the past few weeks: 1. Sharon Churcher (NY office of the Mail) contacted Jeffrey's attorneys leaving Ihe lollowing contact info: PhoneNumber email: Jeffrey's lawyers also received a call from Anna Witheridge of the NY office of the London Mail. I am obtaining her contact into as well and wilt forward that to you as soon as I gel it. 2 Both Jon Swaine and Neal Tweedie from the Daily Telegraph of London also called Jeffrey's awyers. Jon Swarm appears to be from the NY Office. The contact into Swain° loft was: The Daily Telegraph of London 584 Broadway 0601. New York, NY 10012.5243 email. Mobile Oltice Neal Tweedle left only a London tetephone No • 3 Daniel Foggo from the Sunday Times in England also contacted Jeffrey's attorneys leaving the following contact into Telephone Nos.: I whi fc•warrt to yrs: additional reporter contact trio as I gel it Please confirm receipt. Thanks. Darren K. Indyke Darren K. Indyke, PLLC 301 East 66th Street, 10B Now York, New York 10065 •••••••••••••••••••••••••••***** nor* ***tun -us ones *Ire Mtr IM111MIM• MS • The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of EFTA01121320 Vail VII IN. InUyR 's. rt_Lu. VIIdVOlV11LVU UbV, LII*4.4VbUltl VI IAJWyllIti VI Ullb or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us iur■Ilbdately by return e-mail, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. Copyright of Darren K. Indyke, PLLC - @ 2011 Dan-en K. Indyke, PLLC — All rights reserved. .... . en NMI. • I tent en*** ***** ***tin* .M.«....... EFTA01121321 From Darren Indyk Subject Re: Confident) Date March B, 2011 at 8:56 AM To Mike Sitrick Here is Witheridge info as promised: Annette Witheridge: Remember, she is from the NY office of the Mail. Darren On Mar 7, 2011, at 10:51 PM, 'Mice Bartok Thank you ote: EFTA01121322 From: 1.1.ke Subleci RE; E teller Dole: May 11, 2011 1:50748 PM EDT To: Darin Inelyse <mosso fleacorra Cc. Jetty Epstein <jeevacagoneilgenal.corn> Darren The engagemen: lens I sent co March MI lame same as the one Roy Sleek area In 2005 as beer or Jellrey, urn the excepmen el re roles (M4X11 MVO C1101900) and me wryer Deena Jay LigkOWIth (e1 -,etreys request) That 2005 teller erd anew:rent was never laminated I em ens entratng sexier he *roc engagement leaer will. tie rote weaken. CAA X souk, be Telpti I you could tee we eny you tank ‘shy the Wei you reviewed IS uneaten-4CM rd Vaal Is uneccepable Coal I. Mae —Orin Alcamo.— rran: Damn Wyse Sot rnlay. Mq 06, 2u1 I O rli r l ASA To bake Steck Cc Miley 4111111 &elect Engagement Leber I have $dl maid your en2agernem tenet axle's trateceptaa MAIM K Inclyke Darren adylle.PLLC a01 Ea fah Si,.,, too Newt 0 0W S Meet Fes: OXII - • ^ - • • - • The euomunkn centered m tie oannturealbon Is conrdentlek may be allornerelenl refined. one le Mended arty for the use of the addressee. h Is U.S WCOMIY ol Darren K erdyke. PU.0 UneulhOnte0 use. Olselems• or cooing et Hs commun.:aeon a any pert thereof Is seta y peat ted and may be oriel/At II you have received els conenuitteOcntn error, pease early us Immo leery by 'than ern* sit destroy ids commurbaslas ern copies ewe* Irate. Y anactenenta Ospyilottel Doren KAMA,. el.L.0 - (e) 2011 Darren K Wyk', PISC • Al tights moved. ............... •••••••••• 44444 Fee•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• EFTA01121323 From: Ma Sleek SoOket RE: Canll0n Cult June 2. 2011 9: 15 PM DT To: Darren indyts agitated beta ta ~owner< /Baer I sent Jay ern Jay ran: you -s our stamen, engagement letter. kW manly the same !ever as the one sewn was WOCUted tn 2005vels Roy '3, a;:c. nth o1O exospdon rut the billing mica al oxen have changed Over sto pew an yews NYi respell to yr.: role, goo fee fame Is stead In the engagement leder: horn SI 85 en haw tar assecto tam $895 an hour torros rya win a egredule or van tals at what (O. *fowl te racy to proeide I. Meta our ohnetnna Ill as the later stales to provide console; adVIOB and public relearns ~Ian. *Mich ounces are Warded to Wane Toga *dew being gran ba Company and plodded by AttOtney.' I ward JeWey N he wanted telo operave MOW 210 old loner bal will ow new lees and he said ha pre:fired lard Na new laser lo Jay, Meld. I die Aa you way I» ream, Jeffrey called me out re Me blue. asked fee my Rep On Ole malts we I dropped eveinhing ~jumped n. Iced not wag-as we ueualy do-ta get a signed Ongagemern bider rd reamer because (a) we had vented cotta balas and Memo did not allow a FlaTitge aces was WIN% when Jetty called and Marla argon win required. I have Flotta If hens we be yet mother wave restating From an plant" ~yea (It I wen 60vinep Oxen - with of muse I an not - lensed nave 01a gult Cr: Nlotrine, 00 /Mules (when n reptre fro In fa tie Today Snow or ellatey« /40petully: any won't go that Ir ) Rtgarreesa a la starer teen Jeffrey Omni went to men the lottor. 1 maid ifk bat he just WOO= M Invokes we have sent for walk ve have don. One of en meln urposes Mahe letter • as I know you are aware - Is to ~kb insim the protect:as of °Milano tor ourcommatellm nook Conned to hearing korn you soon Best regards. Mss Original Menage-- From: Darren entail j Solt Tandsy. May Si. Ter MIS Seek Staid . Conederdel I just seamed Iron vacation and will get back to you win oornreenis One endel the week In gene's! boart. there la no detail whatsoever In the ergs ornat Mar, inch4ng but ra uneed to detail re rm. approvals or otligaikna and U.S Is ant for stain Curren K tclyire Curren K My**. PLLC 301 East Nth Einel. 100 New rak • • Fax: mat . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P ia Information contained In ash cominatmeon b wade neat may oa albomey-disnt pewieged. sid Is Intended only for the use of the addressee. It es the Progeny°, Darren K belyke. PUG Unnenorlzed use, dallotus or coping re thle a Cernmunkeden sty pal ~pot ts *logy prceibited and may be unlawful you have weaved CM cornmunkadas n error, please notify U5 Mellansly by taken amen EFTA01121324 and 6141rOy 145 commultaiion ard ell cop45 threat Including all anathinents Copyright ol Damn K PU.0 • (e) 2011 Doren K Indyke. RIC • Al tights ressived EFTA01121325 From. Mee SiWO Subject: RE: PRIVILEGED Attorney Client COmmunIcatIon • NY Thee art:e on D 01Y Dale: .Mn 5.2011 1 Cc: Roy BlaM Wart:erg rah inerfa a. Jay Lerma Co: vuy Java° Pair., eitaschMentS.54.5KII The attached article which was on the front page of the Style section of today's NY Times. Fortunately, the reporter - whom I know but d'd not speak with about this story -Ignored what Sarah said in the UK and Jost treated her association wth Jeffrey in brief passing —and not by name. Mike .ta-seth .21 NVIIreencm nett:, flork gimeis Fashion & Style • Saving Sarah From Herself, Oprah Style Garr Ou,04 ale Pry-Ina , ••• haskthal P. Ss ODYSSEY Frac Seth; a sa•pan aocureseery abaal Semh Fe/9, e minsfonneloo NI Liven on Dow Wekvis neck By LeaLLICLEN runes Ansa 2011 CHICAGO Related Times TsPie:SaltikZE:11120 fddrittlattac EFTA01121326 HENNIGAN DORMAINT LLP LAWYERS 865 SOI,TH FIGUEROA STREET SURE 2900 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90017 TELEPHONE FACSIMILE 273 694.1234 Mater PHONZIM [email protected] July 12,2011 VIA EMAIL Mr. Roy Black Black, Srebnick, Komspan & Stumpf 201 S. Biscayne Blvd. Suite 1300 Miami, FL 33131 Dear Roy and Jay: Mr. Jay Lcflcowitz Kirkland & Ellis LLP 601 Lexington Avenue Our firm represents Sitrick And Company. In early March of this year, your client Jeffrey Epstein called Michael Sitrick to ask for his and his firm's help in stemming a tsunami of negative publicity resulting from a photograph of Prince Andrew and Mr. Epstein walking in Central Park. The focus of the publicity, as you are aware, was that Prince Andrew was friends with Mr. Epstein who the British press called a pedophile. Mr. Epstein said this was not only disturbing, but threatening the viability of his business. At the onset of this engagement, Mr. Sitrick asked if he should have Black Srebnick sign a new engagement letter. As you know, the Black Srebnick firm signed the 2005 letter (which by the way was never terminated and therefore is still in effect). Mr. Epstein responded that the letter should be sent to Jay Lefkowitz of Kirkland & Ellis. On March 11, Mr. Sitrick sent Mr. Lefkowitz a copy of Sitrick And Company's standard engagement letter. Given the urgency of the situation and his prior relationship with Mr. Epstein, Mr. Sitrick and one of the firm's senior partners Tony Knight dropped everything, got up to speed and immediately began to work with Mr. Epstein and his attorneys. This was despite the fact that they had not received either a retainer or a newly executed engagement letter. (You both were involved in the work that Sitrick did and were part of many, many email chains reflecting same.) ManageN1756557.1 EFTA01121327 HENNIGAN DORMAN LLP July 12, 2011 Page 2 The media frenzy, again as you both are aware, required Messrs. Sitrick and Knight to work days, nights and weekends. When the Duchess of York, who said she had considered Mr. Epstein a friend, chimed in and also called Mr. Epstein a pedophile, the already frenetic pace of media hysteria accelerated. News publications from The Daily Telegraph to Newsweek jumped on the story. Despite the salaciousness of the coverage in both the U.K. and the U.S., Mr. Sitrick and his team were able to stop stories that would have aired on TV and in the mainstream media in the U.S. Among the media outlets that discussed the "story" with Mr. Sitrick were "60 Minutes" and "Piers Morgan." While they mitigated the damage as much as could be done, Mr. Sitrick and his team believe they would have been able to do a great deal more particularly with respect to the pedophilia allegations — if what they had been told by Mr. Epstein agreed with what they were told by the attorneys representing him with respect to the ages of the girls who provided the massages and other facts of the case. Because the lawyers involved disputed Mr. Epstein's version of the facts, the lawyers intervened and told Sitrick not to move forward on their plan. Sitrick also believes the media allegations about Mr. Epstein being a pedophile could have been put to a stop earlier if thcir advice had been heeded earlier with respect to forcing the Duchess of York to retract her statement calling Mr. Epstein a pedophile. (Getting this term out of the headlines and the stories was, as you are aware, Mr. Epstein's top priority.) Mr. Sitrick has repeatedly tried to get a signed copy of his new engagement letter returned and his invoices paid, but to no avail. On March 31, Mr. Sitrick wrote Darren Indyke of Mr. Epstein's office stating that he understood that Mr. Lefkowitz had forwarded him a copy of the Sitrick engagement letter and that he would appreciate getting it executed and returned. On Saturday April 30 (while Mr. Sitrick was working on a project for Mr. Epstein and in the midst of several email exchanges, he wrote Mr. Epstein that he had not received a response back from Mr. Indyke on his letter. Mr. Epstein apologized and said he would check on Monday. On May 6, Mr. lndyke finally responded with one sentence: "I have reviewed your engagement letter and it is unacceptable." When Mr. Sitrick responded that this was exactly the same letter which was executed in 2005, except for an adjustment in billing rates (a letter which he pointed out was still in effect, since it had not been cancelled) and asked what was unacceptable about it, Mr. Indyke responded that Mr. Epstein was traveling and he would have to wait until Mr. Epstein returned. Once again several weeks passed. On Tuesday, May 31, Mr. Indyke wrote, "1 just returned from vacation and will get back to you with comments at the end of the week. In general, however, there is no detail whatsoever in the engagement letter, including but not limited to detail re fees, approvals, or obligations, and that is just for starters." Mr. Sitrick responded that in fact the engagement letter does include detail about the fees and obligations, but if they wanted more he would be happy to provide it. Mr. Indyke never did get back to Mr. Sitrick. MUmagel756557A EFTA01121328 HENNIGAN DORMAN LLP July 12, 2011 Page 3 Given Mr. Sitrick's long relationship with Mr. Epstein, he is hopeful that Mr. Epstein will sign the letter and, that if he does not want to sign it, that he will just pay Sitrick's invoices and Messrs. Sitrick and Epstein can just part friends. The amount due is $103,518. As stated, Mr. Epstein is obligated to pay both on the basis of the earlier letter, an implied contract and quantum meruit. Mr. Sitrick does not want to have to pursue legal remedies and turn what has been a good relationship into an adversarial one. Thank you for your attention to this matter. JMH/ebm cc [via email]: Michael Sitrick iManagal 756557.1 EFTA01121329 SUMMONS (CITACION JUDICIAL) NOTICE TO DEFENDANT: JEFFREY EPSTEIN; an individual ; (AV7S0 AL DENIANDADO): arid DOES 1 through 20, inclusive YOU ARE BEING SUED BY PLAINTIFF: MUCK AND COMPANY, a (LO ESTA DEMANDANDO EL DEMANDANTE): division of SITRICK SRINCKO GROUP, LLC SUM-100 FORCOURTUSE Ora° PARA tee CC LA CORM MAR 0 7 2013 Idea. Calk; re , Offica/Clea ' NOTICE! You have been suet The owl may dedde against you *those your being heard tans you respond wPEi 30 days. Read the Infonastkin below. You hem 30 CALENDAR DAYS Sr this summon sad legit papers we served on you to file • written response at Oa tarn and him a con served on the pandit A letter or phone called not protect you. Your %wItten respect. newt be In proper anal 'ono f you want the court b hear your case. There may be • court form that you can use for your response. You can find those omit forms and more information at tne Caron* Courts Online Sell-Help Center (wisw.courtinfo.cagovisehhe0), your county law Foray, or lie courthouse nearest you. If you cannot pay the dire tee, ask the court dark formless waiver form. If you do not ell your response on lbws, you slay lose the case by default. and your se.% more's,. one property may be taken without further waning twin the court. There we other legal requirements. You may want to ad an attorney right away. If you do not know an attorney. you rosy want to cab an farrow referral service. If you cannot afford an attom• , you may be deb. for See legal services from a nonprofit legal services progrwn. You can locate these nonprofit groups et the Cattromia Legal Services Web sas (www./awhetoceabmfe.orca, the Calton*, Courts Online Sell-Help Center (ninv.courarleacagovlsoffholp), a by contacting your local court a county bar association. NOTE: The court has a statutory Oen for waved foes and costs on any seamed or arbitradzi ward cf $10.000 or more b a dvi case. The courts lien must be paid before the court wit dismiss the case. ;AVIS°, Lo han demandedo. Si no responds done() de 30 dies la code puede deddk an so cadre sin isseucher au vwsdn. Lea la informacion a continuo:ion Nem 30 DIAS DE CALENDARIO despuds de qua ki entreguen eats clad* y pepeles Nadu pare presenter cane respueste pa escmo en este code y MatereNe as *nevem una cope al dennurdante. Una season Ilamede talelordca no to proteges. Su revues). For °sato gene qua ester en tomato lNeggaela:enact Sl *sea due process') so cast en le oats. Es posfiga qua hays can forandedo quo usted pueda user pare m tsepuests. Puede sncanbar rates formulados do la coda y mar Informacidn en el Centro de Ayuda de las Codes de Co6lornia towwouttittotgoV), en le Soria do byes de so condedo o en le curt° qua b oxide may coma St no puede *gar la cools de ProserAloNo. Pao el seclersde do ta cats qua le di lift /enmity fo de emcee de pogo de octet Si no preemie su mounts a /tempo. puede perderel an pa krotreadenlerdene cora N padre gutter au sualdo, diner* y Penes sin mss adyertanda. Hay abos regulate legates Es reoornendatde qua flame a can Mcgado inmedlatamonta. Si no cane • un ebogado, puede !townie semi* de r•mise* • abogsdoa. SI no Puede pager a arm abogado, as posiblo qua aonpla con its nactulsitos pant °Neon sentos legates grahAlos de W7 program do servicts legates sin (!rtes do luau. Puode oin'Infor efts cruPOS aim fines de luau en el see web de California Legal Services, drnwr.lawholocehrombiorgi en ei Centro de Ayude de his Cones de Cattornte. (wuntsucolle cagey) o poniondose an contocio con Le code o el colegio de abcgados locate& AV/SO: Pa toy, Is cote liens derectio a odium: cis cue:maybe Cestos accentos port opcoat. car gravamen solve cualquier recoperacien dot 310000 6 was de valor reclbkla mode* un *weld° o Loa concesien de arbitreje an co ease de *echo met lingua pager tti preview de a coda antes do qua N corm puede chtsechar caso. l he name and anus of as court is (El ameba, y direction de le cone as): Los Angeles Superior Court central District 111 North Hill Street Los Angeles, California 90012 The name, address, and telephone number of ptaintffs attorney, or plaintiff without an attorney, Is: JONATHAN B. COLE (70460) VINCENT S. GREEN (231046) (El WTI" le direction y fel Malmo ale Wawa del abogado dot damendente, ode/ demandante cos no donee ado, es). NE74B01K & COLE 15260 Ventura Blvd. Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 DATE: John A. Ciaise Clerk, by , Deputy (Feche) (Secratatiq (Acyunto) (For proof of service of this summons use Proof of Service of Summons (form POS-010).) (Pare Nue* de enbege de este *slide use el fonnulado Proof of Sundae of Summons. (P05410)). NOTICE TO THE PERSON SERVED: You ere served MOO 1. E es en Individual defendant 2. as the potion sued under the fictitious name of (specify): 3. 1:71 on behalf of (specify): undo': CCP 418.10 (corporation) n CCP 416.80 (m'nor) = CCP 418.20 (defunct corporatkm) In CCP 418.70 (conservatee) I= CCP 416.40 (association or partnerantp) ED CCP 418.90 (authorized person) C=3 other (sPecfrY): 4. CI by personal delivery on (date): SUMMONS cat. d chi Moods ff 412 20. S 8. • tgkolt' Fs Mc:~ • x tardsiot too Judicla/ Wel d Cass SISICO a01 I. 27001 era raawoc igg02448 c.susTINA GR1JALVA EFTA01121330 y SUM_ A COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY i. .AS ANGELES NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT - UNLIMITED CIVIL CASE (NON-CLASS ACTION) Case Number . 37118 10111,4113 TO BE SEEYED ?MOTU SIMMONS AND COMPLAWI BC 5.0 2 4 4R Yoe: as IS itliettd tor an purports m th Ingdal Meer hullca tea below (Local Rule 35(e)). That Is arMielonal catorinnon on tee reveme xi Oa r• &re fore. ASSIGNED /EDGE DEPT ROOM ASSIGNED JUDOS DEPT ROOM Non Daniel Duty 1 534 Hon, Debra Sets Weintraub 47 507 Hme. Micheal e. Lirdeld 10 631 Hen. Elizabeth Allen Wbita 48 506 Hon. Barbara A. Matra 12 636 Hon. Dclidre NM 49 509 Hoo. Terry A. Omen 14 300 Ma john L Scgal 50 508 Hon Richard PmIn . 15 307 lion Abraham Shim 51 511 Hon. Rita Ma 16 306 Hon. Sawn B1310tDOOSOtt 52 510 Hon. Richard E. Rico 17 309 lion. Strifes J. KIeMel4 53 513 • Hem. Kevin C. Badly 20 10 Hon. Ernest M. Iftroshige 54 512 . . Eton Robed L Hos 24 314 Hart. MaIrolm IL Mackey 55 515 Ike. May Ann Mmyby 25 317 Eon MIciuri Tolman 56 114 Nan James K Duna 26 316 . Flan Mob W. Do 17 517 . . Hoe. Yrtte M. Pelammloa 28 318 Hon. Rolf M. Two 58 516 Non. Barbara Sacra 30 400 Hon. David I.. Mining . 61 632 Han. Al S. Romnfletd 31 407 Hon. Mid:lad L Sian 62 600 Non. Mary Et Strobel 32 406 Hon Mack Muting 68 617 Het Clarke P. Primer 33 409 Hon. Ramona See 69 621 Han. Amy D. Howe 34 Pi Hon. Sousnn G. Brawn 71 729 anoemipat 35 411 Hon. Karen 72 731 Hon. Gregory Abram 36 410 Hon. Tartan Sanebex.thordan 74 • 735 Hon. Joanna O'Dema11 37 Te36 . Hon. Waitron P. Fahey 76 730 Non Mama Dutly-Leviis 38 412 ..• • Hon. Emilie H. Fifes 324 CCW Hon. MkAs41114.Itoanblait 40 r vet' 414 Hon. Elam M. Berle 323 CCW Hat Bortal4 M. Sehlgirm 41 417 Otiur Ha floIly B. Read% • 42 416 . Hon Mel Rad Room 45 529 ' liar. Fredrick C Shale 46 601 Ginn to We PlaIntliFCrons-C-omplainantiAtterrney of Record cc JOHN A. CLARKE, Extractive Of5catClark By , Deputy Clark LACN CCI-t 180 (Rev. (11112) LASC Apr roved 05-08 For Oration& Us, NOTICE Of CASE ASSIGNMENT — Page 1 at 2 UNLIMITED CIVIL CASE EFTA01121331 DiSTRUC. NS FOR HANDLING UNLIMITEI. AVM CASES The following critical provisions of the Chapter Thee Roles, as applicable in the Central Dlealet, are summarized for your assistance. APPLICATION The Ctmpter Throe Rules was effective January 1, 1994. They apply to all general chdl cases. 'wormy OVER MIER RULES The Chapter Three Rules shall have priority over all other Local Roles to the extent the Mhos,: are inconsistent CHALLENGE TS) ASSIGNED JUDGE A challenge under Code of Civil Frooecture section 170.6 must be made within 15 days eller notice of assignee:lit for all purposes to a judge, or if a party has not yet appeared, within 15 days of the fret appearance. TWEE STANDARDS Cases animielto the Inefividoel Calendering Court will be subject to processing uncles the following time etindards: COMPLAINTS: All complaints shall be served within 60 days of filing and proof of novice shell be filed within 90 days of filing. CROSS-COMPLAINTS: Without leave of court first being obtained. no oressoomPlablt may be Sled by any patty dm their amuses is bled. Cross-cmnpleints shall be saved within 30 days of the filing date and a proof of service Bled within 60 days of the filing date. A Status Conference will be schetinled by the assigned independent Calendar Judge no It than 270 days after es filing of the complaint. Counsel must be dilly prepared to Mamas the following imam till:tardy', dispute resolution, bifntBtlm, settlement, tria' 1 date, and war witneaus. FINAL STATUS CONFERENCE The Court will require the parties at a status conference not men than 1 0 days before the trial to have timely filed and served all monana In !intim, bifurcation motions, statements of meilar ovidandsry itattel, diapositive motions, requested jury inetructions, and special jury teeing:0one end special jury verdicts. These matters may be hard and resolved ss this conference. At lent 5 bye before this conference, counsel must also have exchanged lleb of exhibits and witnesses and have rutrmitoxl to the court a brief statement of the case to be read to the jury panel as required by Chapter Eight of the Los Angeles Superior Court Mies SANCTIONS The coati will impose appropriate emotions for the failure or tend to comply wit Chapter Three Roks, ceders made by the Cott, and time standards to deadlines established by the Court or by the Chapter Thee Roles Such sanctions may be an a peaty a if mproprIate on counsel for the party. This Ls not a complete delineation of the Chapter Three Rolm, and adherence only to the above provisions is therefore testa guarantee against the imposition of scuict1ons Tender Trial Co'urt Delay Reduction. Careful reading and compliance with the actual Chapter Rules is absolutely imperative. LACN 0:11100 01/12) NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT — Page 2 of 2 tASC Aporond 05-013 For Optional Una UNLIMITED CIVIL CASE EFTA01121332 1 O 48 Z e 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JONATHAN B. COLE (70460) VINCENT S. GREEN (231046) NEMECEK & COLE APC 1526O Ventura Boulevard, Suite 920 Sherman A 91403 Tel: / Fax: Attorneys for Plaintiff SITRICK AND COMPANY, a division of SITRICK BRINCKO GROUP, LLC CONFORMED COPY ORIGINAL FILED surtitiOR (CURIO? CALLFORMA Courme Or LOSAK ass APR 08 2013 C Executivc Office:VC:laic BY SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNT OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT SITRICK AND COMPANY, a division of SITRICK BRINCKO GROUP, LLC, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, an individual; and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, Defendants. Case No. BC502448 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES BASED UPON: (1) BREACH OF CONTRACT; (2) BREACH OF ORAL CONTRACT; (3) COMMON COUNTS; (4) ACCOUNT STATED; (5) OPEN BOOK ACCOUNT; AND (6) QUANTUM MERUIT DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff, SITRICK and COMPANY, a division of.SITRICK BRINCKO GROUP, LLC ("Plaintifr) complains and alleges as follows: GENERAL ALLEGATIONS 1. Plaintiff is and at all times herein mentioned was, a limited liability company organized and existing under and pursuant to the laws of the State of California and doing business in the State of California, with its principal place of business located in Los Angeles County. 24860034, i corn FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, ETC. EFTA01121333 1 2. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that defendant 2 JEFFREY EPSTEIN ("Epstein") is, and at all times relevant hereto was, a citizen of either 3 Florida or New York 4 3. Epstein has engaged in the necessary minimal contacts with the State of 5 6 California for this Court to entertain personal jurisdiction, including, but not limited to, 7 entering into a contract in California with a California limited liability company, phone calls 8 and emalls to Plaintiff In California for strategy and advice, and paying for services - 9 delivered from California. 10 • 4. On or about November 4, 2005, Epstein entered into a written contract 11 (the "Contract') with Plaintiff to provide advice and public relations services. The 12 Contract provides it may be terminated with 30 days written notice by either party. The 13 14 Contract has never been terminated. A true and correct copy of the contract is attached 15 hereto as Exhibit 1. 16. 5. On or about March 11, 2011, Epstein entered an oral contract with Plaintiff 17 (the 'Oral Contract') to provide consulting advice and public relations services concerning 18 Epstein's relationship with Prince Andrew of England. 19 6. The true names and capacities of Defendants DOES 1 through 20, 20 inclusive, whether individual, corporate, associate, or otherwise, are unknown to Plaintiff 21 22 at this time, who therefore sues said Defendants by such fictitious names, and when the 23 true names and capacities of such Defendants are ascertained, Plaintiff will seek leave of 24 Court to amend this Complaint to insert same. Plaintiff is informed and believes and 25 thereon alleges that each Defendant named as a DOE is responsible for each and every 26 act and obligation hereinafter set forth. 27 7. Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that each Defendant 28 named in this Complaint was at all times herein mentioned and now is the agent, servant 2 209003P 1.com FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, ETC, EFTA01121334 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 gs 11 12 gg: O w 13 14 CA s 16 17 W) z< W 18 1 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 and employee of the other Defendants herein, and was at all such times acting within the course and scope of said agency and employment and with the consent and permission of each of the other co-Defendants, and each of the Defendants herein ratified each of the acts of each of the other co-Defendants, and each of them. 8. The obligation sued upon herein was incurred in and is payable in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. 9. Said obligation is commercial in nature, not based upon a retail installment sales contract or a conditional sales contract, and not subject to the provisions of Civil Code §§1812.10 and 2984.4. FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION (Breach Of Written Contract as Against Epstein and Does 1 through 20, and Each of Them) 10. Plaintiff repeats, realleges and Incorporates herein by reference the allegations of paragraphs 1 through 4 and 6 through 9, inclusive, as though set forth at length. 11. Pursuant to the terms of said Contract, entered into by and between Plaintiff and Epstein on or about November 4, 2005, Plaintiff agreed to provide advice and public relations services to Epstein, and Epstein agreed to pay for these services. 12. Plaintiff has sent written statements of account to Epstein listing the amount of its indebtedness to the Plaintiff and requesting payment therefore from Epstein. 13. On or about July 8, 2011, Epstein breached the Contract by failing to pay Plaintiff for the advice and public relations services rendered. 14. Plaintiff has performed all conditions, covenants and promises required on its part to be performed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Contract except as excused by the breach of Epstein 3 24890O3.P.1.com FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, ETC. EFTA01121335 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 • 10 h 11 12 Ngpi 13 810 m• aTig 14 • I4 15 ?).€ 16 Z < gg: Ag 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 15. Pursuant to the terms of said Contract, and as a result of Epstein breach of said Contract, the Plaintiff has been damaged in the sum of $103,517.82, together with Interest thereon at the legal rate from the date the obligations were due, and said sum is now due and owing. SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION (Breach of Oral Contract as Against Epstein and Does 1 through 20, and Each of Them) 16. Plaintiff repeats, reatleges and incorporates herein by reference the allegations of paragraphs 1 through 3 and 5 through 9, inclusive, as though set forth at length. 17. Pursuant to the terms of said Oral Contract, entered Into by and between Plaintiff and Epstein on or about March 11, 2011, Plaintiff agreed to provide advice and public relations services to Epstein, and Epstein agreed to pay for these services. 18. Plaintiff has sent written statements of account to Epstein listing the amount of its indebtedness to the Plaintiff and requesting payment therefore from Epstein. 19. On or about July 8, 2011, Epstein breached the Oral Contract by failing to pay Plaintiff for the advice and public relations services rendered. 20. Plaintiff has performed all conditions, covenants and promises required on its part to be performed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Oral Contract except as excused by the breach of Epstein. 21. Pursuant to the terms of said Oral Contract, and as a result of Epstein breach of said Oral Contract, the Plaintiff has been damaged in the sum of $103,517.82, together with interest thereon at the legal rate from the date the obligations were due, and said sum is now due and owing. 4 2489003P.1.corn FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, ETC. EFTA01121336 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 L11.11 O e 13 14 15 g! 18 E 17 g 18 if 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION (Open Book Account For Reasonable Value Of Services Rendered as Against Epstein, and Does 1 through 20, and Each of Them) 22. Plaintiff repeats, realieges and incorporates herein by reference the allegations of paragraphs 1 through 9, inclusive, as though fully set forth at length herein. 23. Within the last four years, at Los Angeles County, California, Epstein, became indebted to Plaintiff in the sum of $103,517.82 as and for the balance due upon an open book account for advice and public relations services provided by Plaintiff to Epstein based upon the Contract and Oral Contract. Pursuant to the Contract and Oral Contract, payment was promised and agreed by Epstein to be made. Billing records of legal fees and costs Incurred by Epstein, including debits and credits, were kept in the regular course of business by Plaintiff and kept in a reasonably permanent form reflecting an open book account In the aggregate reasonable value of $103,517.82. 24. No part of said sum has been paid, although demand therefore has been made, and there remains due, owing and unpaid from Epstein to Plaintiff the sum of $103,517.82 together with Interest thereon at the legal rate from the date the obligations were due. FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION (Open Book Account, For Agreed Value Of Services as Against Epstein, and Does 1 through 20, and Each of Them) 25. Plaintiff repeats, realleges and incorporates herein by reference the allegations of paragraphs 1 through 9, inclusive, as though fully set forth at length herein. 26. Within the last four years, at Los Angeles County, California, Esptein became indebted to Plaintiff for legal services provided by Plaintiff to Epstein at its specific instance on an open book account in the agreed value of $103,517.82. 27. No part of said sum has been paid, although demand therefore has been made, and there remains due, owing and unpaid from Epstein to Plaintiff the sum of 5 2469061P.1.corn FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, ETC. EFTA01121337 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 $103,517.82, together with interest thereon at the legal rate from the date the obligations were due. FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION (Account Stated Against Epstein, and Does 1 through 20, and Each of Them) 28. Plaintiff repeats, realleges and incorporates herein by reference the allegations of paragraphs 1 through 9, inclusive, as though fully set forth at length herein. 29. Within the last four years, at Los Angeles County, California, an account was stated by and between Plaintiff and Epstein, wherein and whereby it was agreed that Epstein was Indebted to Plaintiff in the sum of $103,517.82, which sum Epstein agreed and promised to pay, and that no part of the same has been paid. 30. No part of said sum has been paid, although demand therefore has been made, and there remains due, owing and unpaid from Epstein to Plaintiff the sum of $103,517.82, together with interest thereon at the legal rate from the date the obligations were due. SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION (Quantum Nierutt Against Epstein and Does 1 through 20, and Each of Them) 31. Plaintiff repeats, realleges and incorporates herein by reference the allegations of paragraphs 1 through 9, inclusive, as though fully set forth at length herein. 32. Between on or about November 2005 through June 2011, Plaintiff performed public relations services on behalf of Epstein for which Epstein promised to pay Plaintiff at its fair and reasonable value. 33. Demand for payment for these services has been made by Plaintiff to Epstein, but Plaintiff has not been paid. 34. The fair and reasonable value of said services equals not less than $103,517.82 or an amount to be proven at trial. 35. Epstein has failed and refused, and continues to fail and refuse, to pay 6 2489CCP.1.corn FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, ETC. EFTA01121338 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff for said services, leaving a balance immediately due to Plaintiff according to proof, but in no event less than 5103,517.82, together with interest thereon at the rate of 10% per annum from the date saki sum became due. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays judgment against Epstein, and Does 1 through 20, and each of them, as follows: 1. For damages in the sum of $103,517.82, together with interest thereon at the legal rate from the date the obligations were due; 2. For reasonable attorneys as provided for by the Contract; 2. For costs of suit incurred herein; and, 3. For such other relief as the Court deems just and proper. Dated: April 5, 2013 NEMECEK & COLE By: J THAN B. COLE VINCENT S. GREEN Attorneys for Plaintiff SITRICK AND COMPANY, a division of SITRICK BRINCKO GROUP, LLC 7 2439003P.1 can FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, ETC. EFTA01121339 2 3 4 5 8 7 8 10 11 12 I)c! 13 14 15 18 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff SITRICK and COMPANY, a division of SITRICK BRINCKO GROUP, LLC, demands a trial by jury on all claims. Dated: April 5, 2013 NEMECEK & COLE Br.77.4M4 -04 //L_ JONATHAN B. VINCENT S. GREEN Attorneys for Plaintiff SITRICK AND COMPANY, a division of SITRICK BRINCKO GROUP, LLC 8 2489003P.I.eam FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, ETC. EFTA01121340 EXHIBIT A EFTA01121341 I Scott Kornspen - FtoyEilackydf SITRICIANDOMMANYTIC tr011iCELIS•Npl Knot= 42005 Fag, Mack, Slant*. Koosspan &w pt 20i S. Disowns BL, fl300 MS .P. 33111 Dim Mr Utz Mort elm warned by yes Woo Watt or lelThey Epstein (the tilers and abeRfieby Bieck, Imbrick, [angora C Stoop( ralttbatter), w1E tastle0e tb win, arlit sweat a tba ayOmsel of Ritrick Asti OararstlY lm, a CAWS C0WICkg ('ltilltle) a oorpasto tic= advbee. /Padang ceewthenl, wit typos Way kap/ Rasa Atoms; is band Sag Rs ales ante following tams and ocomessons: 1. Tie Mot ad Attonay, etkethe la etOolobs 2I, 0005, S.eawahwd linkt OP =MOM tad *lie telstRsit aavioiteosawodas whit legal lm h b . 1. SIbleir si0 warn b cowy sionfoxlablc runes of $60$O a s 5lc lberv4- CselPasY Wall pay &Oa a noo-telunektde =Wire of ISO,C00 as a =WC, rasa exs Sitrices titre chairs *Cl imb:fled /vine: Cto awns at the boorly rata men a $165 m $650 depsnalia• on the ponce parfornaais taviceg parapsofboisuallsoiamat dos Is billod in 155.00 pa ban. Wiwi the rosince Ws bee spoked valor Wm data" Satin' time dna Is any yen will Is baled 'incurred end an payable witbin Cy Woe a0a Co. Charges tie ccespuid an • Fortalavpartil basis for sy panel dew rot most*" bald outside or Sio*k. OTC Theo la 51)5 by Wok a incense of onsgesc & boa. W isIdItiCa, w custom:WV moues. a - tic Re If wt ban* w S.. palonned lurks, As • clime which mob la alculbcart beneflia os to thong bcyoal dal we turban a oars] pubtlo stadwas dsn mild beam Obviously, we "odd et dew, and "IWO OW .ix WM'S OX with yos If w. bacao it b sessneedots Guth Gs souk/ sulqcri to you avowal PI swim our bob oath cr. 'urge Cob If you barer), wssloss. please fad Ws to nIL Elcavesci, ads you isoks some promo la Sttsick in wrba..tg within Cy Si of swiss of to bill, it will be prwomod yo• bare no **odor* bit and afya m tboreaamblcress adze NIL 3. Ts Ctleat stall nizibuse Sliatt IOW!, missy ;bp of 1.-maxx darn for soy sod all as of sad posb sod crycnaes tasinol b9 nrick In connection ebb In ewpserd Iwo CksayPteia Gat • Si MO* Lam Mgt. Cn ICOIT-SCS 00) MOW Pao 04 MSS] EFTA01121342 srnuat AND cainbrr INC lannolin lniernatto 4, 2003 Octodbawitbok uwiØ b■adcoa cextrana mats, laa &mot mad pleemeopy cturgn, sod abet onef-pooloat eon ad imams. Rsistaabh corn an not mailed apart fbe Manor lad crab* billed matey by Stutok 4. Kind Monocrtedges that ht torrloa Wog Peorlded anima to 4th has wan in for du Iambi of CiOnt and diet Attorney, ea Cann coutud, tWU out be tramaibh for aø aa, maw omens hound lo amitectioo win SSW' Ravin 5. SOntek AM Company's ongatanaa berounikis tidy be baminad by pert( Is Xi don prior tericen notim. AU ~dam Meth Mae anti... to to primal of fan rad mainibt aqt ladamilloaka w0 who s7 itrarbake of due awarnical by tift• pry. All tho perndzion of titia Mix anisical In manic 4 5. 6 ad 7 MI ore fix s pnod of ton sari Moving dit dale at eery ØØ d ta t mesa by direr Ø. 6. ID me and any =pays, idShick o any ciao la tmoired or tma:and to ~it Ot ~do mtbnoy, demean 4X otba 'Ada an adm orbit/Mon or odor pwarahm main. directly a lallmaly, to an ensidirsta, abeam or eat or crosemi bra has tomenoted, the Client doll pay Snick for ta dam tØ b ~Or tar ad prondim nab patiape Cm a toe/cm, t Senora flica grant DOME Mia, ad fix age mat and limn lachai* alora7a Stu, tommi ia atteala thennrith 7. Clan iiitaanoadonnify ad bold banana 5erlrk å dareboldcm, diem, &noon, cocky= Ned era (mob ea Sty a won balm natural b u en loderanacd Penn, faro and op-wet my cal tl :non dabs, dawn, Ibiladek emit tad enacata (brelodim, bra an Meted to, intombh actincria ha) which any IsdanniSed PM= 1~ b< ailklen to et Oar lo carat abli Ibe 1~9 re Maori by Sabot ro aka flat Attorney. 71h ~Is rho" io tol cam halo, <In aita *SS costa a amino of Gay Inifazzleod Pram that oe ptcrniay ~Sid b ban naked flew SØ tr cab odor oaseirICIrd otinco1 you at at !MIN ~Mt S. Fab of de pain boron wpm 11, tom In It ainwt, an the ma cod itemEtkra bona( la lucReg Nita aamanus ad Om data minty codittaridal, norm cnty in en" be coatary ba adorn Oa /oftm AD oicanmiciaockt, corrnModetar, iHiaae aid anima box Slakk gal Attorney dial be dental orsaa coma ~ram "Ed twit prodded by en Mornoy-obeet ~apt Bach of tid mrem agape not to Kirk ibr employma. ror aop/oy, aay tocriteryot of tits odor dudes iiir~ of WWI enimerrent end fontanel of an yens tbandltr. 9. AØ gum an pad to Slid& post Isiah ratecnera wain tee clay' Men doo toll ba tan Mtn Tik åaa Once Wawa Italia, be oototrattal tit wane øy 2 Lao Oeme ~lbw. Slm.km 0•011,,CA 1W17.110, pa nia73.6.t da man EFTA01121343 Tao 3š SITRICIE AND COMPANY INC LC »anonym November 4..2005 warlike o( Ns C tireatentlteennalitg party dan to aand to ram* ationkey feet Any coonent rry, dab/ ev &pint reship:, th b lacings's:on YO bo tesolyed by binding telttteto n bow:Wm wit 17 rota 'eat Antrim Mini& Asoelatios parson ono fl ints* condo:be! Jo La Awls County, Malt iretect ups sot etbkritioa my to caved le my ant Levis" Jwidiceion Otimat Ibis lea: agreemeg 'ball be Imaim:led and Worm% lo oconlooreld% RAMS. teen at es State ofCatJmrelo opptiestk to aggro* mat NW šo be netzsmed Aiwa Voy ad& Oslo= and ChlerflbsoarjTo Officer Arid ki obi soli this e %sic( rlaue..tže -mine Cassel la Clad ‘t-tAs- , SA 4 .•14 in) P1/(her 41," On.. fat 6n.atts KaAvea.. 0APr. 3 1,40 Cram Anal • čobi ED • Lao Awl% CA MA U , TO-2250 • So CM TS= • EFTA01121344 [Scott Korneten - Ftaytilteck.pd1 Pegs4i Nanaster 4. 2003 SITRICS AND COMPANY INC. 1.13 At= •leflaX Roy Mick, lbw+ Bled, Soloak, Amapa A Shawl 20M 3. Bigwig Di, PI 2C0 11,PL mu Re Jetty a:0Mo Rena" 01e !bestial torkilir Otakisr 21 IOCO 720,000.00 Reforiabk. Thr.. Wine TOTAL MM —16,C01.03 1.101000,00 Pis vista:kW Ito* kc QTYNiCIONALBA}C admit Afirower OP: SMOCK AHD COMPANY ABA ROUTINO NO: 222 0 If DM CREMY ACCOUNT NW 11110417w AMR DAY/3 HAINAN Pa make chest mobil; IL !MUM AND COMPANY DC. IMO Coitcry Park Past, T Tel 4 EFTA01121345 1 JONATHAN B. COLE (70460) DAVID A. MYERS (140181) 2 NEMECEK & COLE A Professional Corporation 3 15260 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 920 ShewapislaigLgji fom 4 Tel. a / Fax 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff SITRICK AND COMPANY, a division of SITRICK BRINCKO GROUP, LLC 6 7 8 9 Fiat Court of Cathorria Stsgutty of Los Angeles APR 15 2014 Sherri Carter, scueve Off icercler By 9,1%—s h. osrlr Deputy Borne, G SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT 10 s SITRICK AND COMPANY, a division of ) Case No. BC502448 I II SITRICK BRINCKO GROUP, LLC .....1 ) ) [Assigned to the Hon. Kevin C. Brazile: W OE 12 Plaintiff. ) Dept. 20) _I ) -vs- ) [Diteite€41D] ORDER ) O 14 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, an individual; and ) o 15 DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, le ga ) (Lodged Concurrently with (Proposed] ) Judgment By Court By Default) mal.,' x gat 16 Defendants. ) E,S If ) l7 ) ) C ) ? 18 ) S 0 19 ) 20 On April 10, 2014, during the 8:30 a.m. calendar, in Department 20 of the Central District of 21 the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, the Request for Judgment of Plaintiff 22 SITRICK AND COMPANY, a division of SITRICK BRINCKO GROUP, LLC ("SITRICK") in the 23 total amount of $170,983.22 against Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN ("EPSTEIN") came on for 24 hearing before the Hon. Kevin C. Brazile. David Myers, Esq. of Nemecek & Cole appeared on behalf 25 of SITRICK. There were no other appearances. The Court, after due consideration of the papers and 26 evidence submitted regarding the matter, and oral argument orders as follows: 27 1. Certain costs requested by SITRICK are disallowed including the "Arbitration Filing 28 Fce" in the amount of $2,850 (SITRICK's Memorandum of Costs dated March 17, —I- 24119003P 10 Proposed Orderupd ORDER EFTA01121346 10 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 14 Date: April L. 2014 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2014 at 7.d) and other arbitration fees in the amount of $1,850 from the $3,328.52 in 2 "Other" costs (SITRICK's Memorandum of Costs dated March 17, 2014 at 7.c., 3 Attachment l). As such, the total amount of costs in the "Other" costs section that are 4 allowed is $1,478.52 ($3,328.52 less 51,850). 5 2. As to attorneys fees, the Court awards a total of 520,000 (510,819 less than the 6 530,819 SITRICK requested). 7 3. The Remainder of SITRICK's Request for Court Judgment is GRANTED and as such 8 a JUDGMENT in favor of SITRICK AND COMPANY, a division of SITRICK 9 BRINCKO GROUP, LLC and against JEFFREY EPSTEIN shall be issued in the total amount of $155,464.22 ($170,983.22 - $2,850 - $1,850 - $10,819). EVTN C. BRAZ1LE, Judge, California, County of Los An —2— nor oun of 2489003P.10 Proposed Order.wpd ORDER EFTA01121347 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JONATHAN B. COLE (70460) DAVID A. MYERS (140181) NEMECEK & COLE A Professional Corporation 15260 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 920 d f 9 Tel / fax Attorneys for Plaintiff SITRICK AND COMPANY, a division of SITRICK BRINCKO GROUP, LLC CFN 20140318368 OR PK 27003 PG 1065 RECORDED 98/27/2914 08:08:15 Pals Beach County, Florida Sharon R. Bock, CLERK 8 COIIPTROLLER Pon 1065 - 1067; (3pgs) SUPERIOR COURT OF TIIE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT SITRICK AND COMPANY, a division of SITRICK BRINCKO GROUP, LLC Plaintiff, -vs- JEFFREY EPSTEIN, an individual; and DOES I through 20, inclusive, Defendant. Case No.: BC 502448 [Assigned to the Hon. Kevin C. Brazile: Dept. 20] AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF FOREIGN JUDGMENT IN FLORIDA DAVID A. MYERS, declares: I. I am an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of California. I am a member of Nemecek & Cole, a Professional Corporation, the attorneys of record for Plaintiff/Judgment Creditor, SITRICK AND COMPANY, a division of SITRICK BRINCKO GROUP, LLC ("SITRICK"). I have personal knowledge of the following facts and could and would competently testify thereto if called as a witness in this action. 2. The judgment creditor's name is SITRICK AND COMPANY, a division of SITRICK BRINCKO GROUP, LLC and the business address is 11999 San Vicente Blvd., Penthouse, Los —1- 2489003P I I Allictral %.pd EFTA01121348 1 Angeles, CA 90049. 2 3 3. The judgment debtor is known to me as JEFFREY EPSTEIN and was last known to 4 reside at 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Beach, FL 33480. 5 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is 6 true and correct. 7 8 Dated: 0 1/2 :0 9 10 11 12 13 05 ApeefeS 14 State of California2 County of 16 O ,7el% before 15 me/rnyineMate9tlihS01//Ani o tcer) (insert name an Mit of the _) _ 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 personally appeared CI A. M ti" S ry who provided to me o e basis of satisfacto eiidence to be the person(s} whose names} is/are- subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that h qui/they executed the same in his/W*4140i, authorized capacity(ies)-, and that by his/Ivarliheir signature(*on the instrument the person(a); or the entity upon behalf of which the persons)-acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. (Seal) YVONNE M. MAGHSODi Commission • 2042160 Wiry Public • Cattalo tab •••••1 County Cara E tin Sn 20, 2011 -2- 2489003P I I Allithvit wpd EFTA01121349 Scene air us nory mina .010leat Ca 11111~•• ..9•1111~ loordmr. B. Co:c (S8N 70160) '-DavkS A My til (SBN 140111) ' NEMECEK 1. COLE 15260 Vernon Blvd., Suim 920 Sherman Ow, CA 9Mtie CCCCOIC.0 caeca a> fOal Ca ccacadas pi O , 0,11 o area Mira 411 sunda0140011T OF Cruflorm.OXINTY OS Las Anodes ~mews 111North Hill Sired --as in no= Los A Vie r. California 90012 emorreee CENTRAL DISTRICT • ann. SHTICK ANDCOMPANY.« derision or SITRICK BRINCKO ()MOUE, LLC otstersert IEFFP.EY EPSTERT; EA individual. ad DOES 1.20 JUDGMENT Lat IN Mort Wk ChEretrom C AN, ~1 NI LIU fird Cowl DI On sepus••• C Panda DM Not ~nos •I TAM JUOCIÉE•IT I (I) Iv Df5AULT • Delang••• wma reently ~0 —I • we" 04 ?b, Wan or4 cATAAAM. b. ~a IAA' d •••••( Ihe campart or sows 4e4n1 aeon vrep sIsNres or Ow. C Piimanr. tasi ((pm ~AS by M• der% (an ptemrrs sommen d. r100.4. ~MK (COCA Ca. hoc. 5 SS Deve~ was C•n• ray or. * ~as: indsnenr N. cot. tr tub kw III* Ina el at/ 4, CD Court Jana( (Cade Ca Prte...1045111). T14 01491044~ 4 (1) C Pable•Clata and at acne f2) CX7 MOM11~1149 Merwsmn <Gem Cur hoc, I lam CF•4 ...:014163.16369 OR Ell< 270113 PG 1068 MONO 04/27/2•14 114:111I1S Pale leach County, Fl Ida Simnel I. lock, CLERK 1 COMPTELISI Poe 1•66 - 1069; 12~1 ORIGINAL,. FILED lit vcruit ~ma APR 14 2014 Mel Carm.~ 46,...71- orro4 ens Ca. atA BC502441 2 Ci ON STIPULATION • POI•40 careant ewe« Nomearreel "NC paorO. be *Nan A (FA case Pit al aped ue A(~C (.1•9•1••• R. Can And aim we. a In Cs C•60 C. the •bpason was sad in Open an C a44N•bnn.nueww•4raClU Arta COURT TRIAL IS pay in* court ~am lhe *Mena • TM 0•44 tin Ificd d. (a( lens) Pall M4-ends/ *No« 1 ~Ina try ~Mr ne4e any Df (II 1-D Co.•‘.61 on *A.:7~i' as, taleran 'rums •.o1) II) I=1 ~am sasi In" ~V (1) fi DthnOmis scene/ CI Cabal on ~amid lb • Cklend•ni (Al ••••• 4 CI a Cana a inalg ~nos AIN •••••• *WS (73 Cauca 04 Ofain (Ca CA PrOC .1 032) O ella not n• 1~ 4 PAP. al 1 I...01/•••••.~, i•••••É • mamma AA YIP Mow a•••••• , ISM JUOGIUNT Cabe IC•ina• Melee* EFTA01121350 • PLAINTIFF: SITRICK AND COMPANY, a division of SIIRICK BRINCKO - GROUP, I.,LC DEFENDANT: JEFFREY EPSTEIN; an individual; and DOES 1-20 CASE *SK* BCS02448 JUDGMENT IS ENTERED AS FOLLOWS BY: al THE COURT ED THE CLERK 4. Q Stipulated Judgment. Judgment Is entered according to the stipulation of the parties. 5. Parties. Judgment Is a. cri for plaintiff (name each): Sitrick And Company, a division of Sitrick Brincko Group, LLC and against defendant (names): Jeffrey Epstein, an individual CI Continued on Attachment 5a. b. C for defendant (name each): 6. Amount a. ED Defendant named In Item Sa above must pay plaintiff on the complaint (1) OD (2) OD (3) OD (4) OD (5) n Damages Prejudgment Interest at the annual rate of 10 % Attorney fen Costs Other (specify): $ 103,617.82 $ 29,652.93 $ 20,000.00 $ 2,293.47 shoo (6) TOTAL $155,464.22 b. CD Plaintiff to receive nothing from defendant named in item 5b. Defendant named In item 5b to recover costs $ 0.00 and attorney fees 3 0.00 7. C Other (specify): Date: Dale: ;be.ti,ejr.44) C. C for cross-completnent (name each): and against cross-defendant (name each): Continued on Attachment Sc; d. C for cross-defendant (name each): c. C:l Cross•defendant named In item 5c above must pay cross-complaInant on the ups...complaint (1) CD Damages 0.00 (2) ED Prejudgment interest et the annual rale of S4 0.00 (3)l) Attorney fees 0.00 (4)O Costs 0.00 (5) Ej Other (specify): 0.00 (6) TOTAL 0.00 d. O Crose-complainant to receive nothing from cross-defendant named in item 5d. CI Cross-defendant named In Item 5d to recover Is 3 0.00 L...1 and attorney fees $ 0.00 CLERK'S CERTIFICATE (Optional) I certify that this is a true copy of the original judgment on Me In the court Dale: AUG 1 5 2014 Clerk. by JUDGMENT Deputy Peesitsfi EFTA01121351