From: Lilly Ann Sanchez <

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S INITIAL DISCLOSURES Respondent United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, makes its Initial Disclosures, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(1)(A), and state: Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(1)(A)fil: 1. R. Alexander Acosta Dean, School of Law Florida International University Rafael Diaz-Balart Hall 11200 S.W. 8'h Street Miami, Florida 33199 (305) 348-1118 Dean Acosta was the United States Attorney, Southern District of Florida, during the time when the criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein was opened in the U.S. Attorney's Office, and the non-prosecution agreement was negotiated. 2. was the First Assistant U.S. Attorney in the U.S. Attorney's Office, during the time when the criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein was opened, and the non-prosecution agreement was negot

-- I have received and reviewed your letter. I cannot print and sign until I am back in the office on 11/15.

Dear -- I have received and reviewed your letter. I cannot print and sign until I am back in the office on 11/15. From: To: Cc: Subject: L.n.scb E. ktc Jcincy J-pw.ctiti - Lsni6atiun nuustivital Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 14:20:52 +0000 Importance: Normal Thanks much Enjoy your cruise and thank you very much for the information. I.(USAFLS) Thursday. November I4Rrt> arp the FRI aceRntc invnlvprl in the original investigation: Original supervisor was (I think he is now in DC). Later replaced by The ASAC and SAC also attended meetings to discuss the plea negotiations. From our Office, most of the key players are gone, but their electronic files will have to be preserved: R. Alexander Acosta At DOJ, there is/was At Palm Beach PD, was the Chief, he is no longer there. as the Detective. I think he is still there. Those were the only two we ever dealt with. The lawyers for Epstein were: Kenneth Starr Jay Lefkowitz Alan Dershowitz Lily Roy Black Jack Goldber

EFTA Document EFTA01695623

U.S. Department of Justice

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida VIA FACSIMILE Michael R. Tein, Esq. Lewis Tein, P.L. 3059 Grand Avenue, Suite 340 Coconut Grove, FL 33133 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Mr. Tein: 500 South Australian Ave.. Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (56!) 820-8711 Facsimile: (561) 820-8777 July 17, 2008 The Office has reviewed your "Notice of Continued Pendency of Federal Criminal Action," and we feel that it misrepresents the posture of the federal investigation. For example, you cite to In re Grand Jury, No. FGJ 07-103 (WPB), as evidence that the federal criminal action remains pending. That is a citation to Mr. Epstein's Motion to Quash a subpoena for computer equipment removed from Mr. Epstein's home after he and his attorneys were aware of the existence of the state investigation. Pursuant to the Non- Prosecution Agreement, that motion was supposed to have been withdrawn several months ago, and, therefore, is not "pending" in

EFTA Document EFTA01718041

U.S. Department of Justice

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida DELIVERY BY FACSIMILE Jay P. Lefkowitz, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LLP Citigroup Center 153 East 53rd Street New York, New York 10022-4675 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Jay: 300 S. Australian Ave, Ste 400 West Palm Beach, FL 3340! August 13, 2008 As per your request, I am attaching several documents related to Mr. Epstein's performance of the Non-Prosecution Agreement. The first document attached hereto is the June 30, 2008 proposed Notification, which was hand-delivered to Jack Goldberger and Michael Tein shortly after Mr. Epstein entered his guilty plea. Following that, I have attached the July 9, 2008 response from Mr. Goldberger. I have highlighted two portions. The first is where Mr. Goldberger (presumably with the approval of Mr. Tein) approves of the portion of my proposed Notification that quotes directly from the U.S. Attorney's December letter to Lilly Ann Sanchez. The second portion is