Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta01198414DOJ Data Set 9Other

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 336 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2015 Page 1 of 2

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta01198414
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 336 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2015 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.:08-CV-80736-ICAM JANE DOE 1 and JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER This cause is before the Court on the Government's Notice of Partial Compliance (DE 332) and non-party victims' Response to Court Order of July 6, 2015 and United States' Notice of Partial Compliance (DE 335). On July 6, 2015, this Court ordered the Government to provide Petitioners with certain documents indicating "which individuals the Government considered to be victims or potential victims at the time it negotiated the non-prosecution agreement." (DE 330 at 24). If Petitioners were previously unaware of these victims' identities, the Court concluded, they were entitled to production under "an appropriate protective order to protect the victims' identity." (K. at 24-25). On July 20, 2015, the Government indicated its partial compliance with this order; however, the Government indicated its belief that disclosing the identities of previously unnamed victims without their consent "would violate both state law and the CVRA." (DE 332 at 4). The Government indicated that it was currently "attempting to determine whether any of the named individuals will consent to the disclosure of their names and whether the petitioners are already EFTA01198414 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 336 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2015 Page 2 of 2 aware of some (or all) of the names." (L1.). The Government indicated that it was working with Petitioners' counsel to resolve the issue without court intervention. (Id. at 5). On July 24, 2015, counsel for a group of victims who had previously settled claims with Intervenor Epstein filed a court document indicating that they "do not consent to their identities being revealed to the Petitioners." (DE 335 at I). To the extent their identities are known to the Government "or others," these victims request that their identities not be further disseminated. (DE 335 at I). In light of these developments, the Court finds it necessary to supplement its July 6, 2015 Opinion and Order (DE 330) as follows: 1. The Government shall not be required to disclose to Petitioners the identities of unnamed victims whom are not already known to Petitioners and who do not consent to disclosure until after the Court has evaluated the Government's position that doing so would violate state and federal law; 2. To the extent any victim's identity is disclosed to Petitioners, under no circumstance shall that victim's identity be disseminated to anyone other than the Government and Petitioners, and under no circumstance shall that victim's name appear in any court document unless filed under seal. DONE AND ORDERED in chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 27th day of July, 2015. ern KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge 2 EFTA01198415

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Case #9:08-CV-80736-KAM

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedJun 16, 2023

Deutsche Bank Epstein victim questionnaire

EXHIBIT A-1 Case 1:22-cv-10018-JSR Document 90-2 Filed 06/16/23 Page 1 of 12 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Case No. 1:22-CV-10018 (JSR) NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION TO: ALL VICTIMS OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN’S SEX TRAFFICKING VENTURE DURING THE TIME PERIOD AUGUST 19, 2013 TO AUGUST 10, 2019 (THE “CLASS PERIOD”). IN ORDER TO QUALIFY FOR A SETTLEMENT PAYMENT, YOU (OR CLASS COUNSEL ON YOUR BEHALF) MUST TIMELY SUBMIT A TIER ONE FORM BY ___________, 20

12p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 013-80736-Civ-Marra/Nlatthewman JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. DECLARATION OF IN SUPPORT OF GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE AND OPPOSITION TO PETITIONERS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. I also am admitted to practice in all courts of the states of Minnesota and Florida, the Eighth, Eleventh, and Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals, and the U.S. District Courts for the Southern District of Florida, the District of Minnesota, and the Northern District of California. My bar admission status in California and Minnesota is currently inactive. I am currently employed as an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of Florida and was so employed during all of the events described herein. 2. I am the Assistant United States Attorne

5p
Court UnsealedMar 17, 2016

Usg-Lavabit-Unsealed

U.S. District Court Eastern District of Virginia - (Alexandria) CRIMINAL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:13-sw-00522-CMH-1 Case title: USA v. In Re: Information Associated Date Filed: 07/16/2013 Date Terminated: 03/24/2015 with [Redacted] Assigned to: District Judge Claude M. Hilton Appeals court case number: 13-4625 Defendant (1) In Re: Information Associated with [Redacted] TERMINATED: 03/24/2015 Pending Counts Disposition None Highest Offense Level (Opening) None Terminated Counts Disposition None

560p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372172011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 1. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater

15p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00016005

0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

19p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.