From: Martin Weinberg

From: Martin Weinberg To: "jeffrey E." <[email protected]> Cc: Subject: Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2015 23:46:18 +0000 Attachments: 3771_-_DE268_-_Jane_Doe_Motion_for Further_Discove/y.pde 3771_-_DE267_- Motion_to_Seal.pdf Martin G. Weinberg, Esq. This Electronic Message contains information from the Law Office of Martin G. Weinberg, P.C., and may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, please note that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. On Mon, 7/6/15, jeffrey E. [email protected]> wrote: Subject: Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE To: "Martin Weinberg" cMINIM> Date: Monday, July 6, 2015, 6:20 PM EFTA01206316 what doe is getting unsealed? On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 12:19 AM, Martin Weinberg wrote: To let cassell show pattern of violationslrony - cassells 2 clients not cooperating with fbi as of 9 24 07Arguable defense to SJLets think thru best way to motivate govt to seek reconsideration Sent from my iPhone On Jul 6, 2015, at 5:03 PM, "jeffrey E." <[email protected]> wrote: how can he give cassell the name of potential victims??? ! On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 10:47 PM, Martin Weinberg wrote: To fully identify the narrow group of documents (other than the attorney correspondence that was the subject of the llth Circuit appeal) for which the Court is ordered discovery we need to go to the privilege logs and compare to pgs 26-51 of opinion. I can do that Wednesday if desired. Overall, this opinion is a thorough repudiation of Cassell's attempts to seek GJ materials, prosecution file evidence, Govt work product, draft indictments, anything to do with the GJ investigation on relevance, 6E, and work product grounds. Clear the OPR was about MM and the mensal about defending the Office position on the CVRA (probably unnecessary if SD Fla didn't volunteer). I have again asked Dexter Lee for copy of what Govt produced to Cassell re attorney correspondence (email this AM). I expect a Govt Rule 26 letter to Cassell identifying witnesses and documents and the long awaited Partial SJ from Cassell. We should "take on" the SJ to the extent it alleges any "conspiracy" and request and strongly advocate that Dexter include in his response an opposition to the continuation of these baseless accusations. Martin G. Weinberg, Esq. EFTA01206317 This Electronic Message contains information from the Law Office of Martin G. Weinberg, P.C., and may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, please note that any disclosure, copying, EFTA01206318 distribution, or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property EFTA01206319 of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA01206320