Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta01246366DOJ Data Set 9Other

Notes from phone call with

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta01246366
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Notes from phone call with April 1, 2020 Mandy Young, Alison Moe, Maurene Comey, Alex Rossmiller Gloria Allred At request of team addressed with her our question, previously posed through counsel, relating to her views of a possible pre-trial resolution with respect to said, in sum and substance, that she preferred not to testify at a trial, to maintain her privacy—that she so far had not been associated with Epstein publicly—and that she supported a plea disposition, including one that would not involve a charge of sex trafficking (and that, rather, would be a plea relating to concealment or obstruction in connection with the scheme) - We advised that in such a scenario, would still have the opportunity to speak or to make a submission at sentencing conveyed that it was important to her that take responsibility for her conduct, and also that had some sympathy for said, in sum and substance, that she credits that was a victim, and that she believed E stein could have manipulated her into believing he was rescuing her. Also said that if is a victim, then she should support other victims. o said, in sum and substance, that she thought if hadn't been there, it would have been some other assistant [undertaking the role] and that she has empathy for because other people also observed Epstein's behavior and didn't do anything. also said she never had the feeling that wanted to be there. We further advised that our discussion was not in lieu of any obligations under the Crime Victims Right Act, and that additional formal notice would precede any disposition CONFIDENTIAL 3501.104-016 Page I of I EFTA_00063968 EFTA01246366

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedAug 19, 2019

Letter Motion

Letter Motion, USA v. Epstein, No. 1:19-cr-00490-1 (S.D.N.Y. Aug 19, 2019)

3p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01649313

3p
Court UnsealedJul 15, 2019

Letter Motion

Letter Motion, USA v. Epstein, No. 1:19-cr-00490-1 (S.D.N.Y. Jul 15, 2019)

1p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 100

The government opposes Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed bail motion, arguing that she remains a flight risk due to the seriousness of the charges, strong evidence against her, and her financial resources and foreign ties. The court had previously denied bail after a thorough hearing, and the government contends that Maxwell's new bail package does not alter the court's prior finding.

36p
Court UnsealedJul 2, 2020

Maxwell Detention Memo

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 4 Filed 07/02/20 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA -v.- : : GHISLAINE MAXWELL, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) : Defendant. : ---------------------------------------------------------------x THE GOVERNMENT’S MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF DETENTION AUDREY STRAUSS Acting United States Attorney Southern District of New York Attorney for the United Stat

10p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court filings: 8

The documents include court filings related to the cases of Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The first filing concerns the scheduling of Maxwell's arraignment and bail hearing, while the second is related to Epstein's bail motion and financial disclosure.

4p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.