Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta01249950DOJ Data Set 9Other

PROFFER AGREEMENT

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta01249950
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
PROFFER AGREEMENT With respect to the meeting of "Client' and her attome Esq., with Assistant United a es •c ti rneys gust 4, 2021 ("the meeting"), the following understandings exist: (I) THIS IS NOT A COOPERATION AGREEMENT. The Client has agreed to provide the Government with information, and to respond to questions, so that the Government may evaluate Client's information and responses in making prosecutive decisions. By receiving Client's proffer, the Government does not agree to make a motion on the Client's behalf or to enter into a cooperation agreement, plea agreement, immunity or non-prosecution agreement. The Government makes no representation about the likelihood that any such agreement will be reached in connection with this proffer. (2) In any prosecution brought against Client by this Office, except as provided below the Government will not offer in evidence on its case-in-chief, or in connection with any sentencing proceeding for the purpose of determining an appropriate sentence, any statements made by Client at the meeting, except (a) in a prosecution for false statements, obstruction of justice or perjury with respect to any acts committed or statements made during or after the meeting or testimony given after the meeting; or (b) if, at any time following the meeting, Client becomes a fugitive from justice. (3) Notwithstanding item (2) above: (a) the Government may use information derived directly or indirectly from the meeting for the purpose of obtaining leads to other evidence, which evidence may be used in any prosecution of Client by the Government; (b) in any prosecution brought against Client, the Government may use statements made by Client at the meeting and all evidence obtained directly or indirectly therefrom for the purpose of cross-examination should Client testify; and (c) the Government may also use statements made by Client at the meeting to rebut any evidence or arguments offered by or on behalf of Client (including arguments made or issues raised sua snonte by the District Court) at any stage of the criminal prosecution (including bail, all phases of trial, and sentencing) in any prosecution brought against Client. (4) The Client understands and agrees that in the event the Client seeks to qualify for a reduction in sentence under Title 18, United States Code, Section 3553(f), United States Sentencing Guidelines, Sections 2D1.1(b)(18) or 5C1.2, or Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b), the Office may offer or use at any stage of the criminal proceeding any statement made by Client during the meeting, and all evidence obtained directly or indirectly therefrom, to the extent such use is consistent with Section 402 of the First Step Act of 2018. (5) To the extent that the Government is entitled under this Agreement to offer in evidence any statements made by Client or leads obtained therefrom, Client shall assert no claim under the United States Constitution, any statute, Rule 410 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, or any other federal rule that such statements or any leads therefrom should be suppressed. It is the intent of this Agreement to waive all rights in the foregoing respects. 3501.480-004 Page 1 of 2 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00095631 EFTA01249950 (6) If this Office receives a request from another prosecutor's office for access to information obtained pursuant to this Proffer Agreement, this Office may furnish such information but will do so only on the condition that the requesting office honor the provisions of this Agreement. (7) It is further understood that this Agreement is limited to the statements made by Client at the meeting and does not apply to any oral, written or recorded statements made by Client at any other time. No understandings, promises, agreements and/or conditions have been entered into with respect to the meeting other than those set forth in this Agreement and none will be entered into unless in writing and signed by all parties. (8) The understandings set forth in paragraphs I through 7 above extend to the continuation of this meeting on the dates that appear below. (9) Client and Attorney acknowledge that they have fully discussed and understand every paragraph and clause in this Agreement and the consequences thereof. Dated: New York, New York August 4, 2021 orney for taien AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York Dates of Continuation Initials of counsel. Client, AUSA, witness 2020.12.11 3501.480-004 Page 2 of 2 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00O95632 EFTA01249951

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

U.S. Department of Justice

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio J. Moll° Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York. New York 10007 December 17, 2020 BY FEDERAL EXPRESS MDC—Metropolitan Detention Center Legal Department 80 29th Street Brooklyn, NY 11232 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Enclosed is discovery pertinent to the following inmate: • Ghislaine Maxwell: 02879-509 Please allow her access to the materials enclosed. by: Enclosure Very truly yours, AUDREY STRAUSS Acting United States Attorney Assistant United States Attorneys EFTA00078333

1p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00031870

0p
Court UnsealedOtherUnknown

Juror Questionnaire: 2020-cv-00000000-JN Document 6423-11 Filed 03/21/22 Page 515 of 830

Juror ID 50 responded to a questionnaire regarding their ability to serve as a fair and impartial juror. They indicated no association with the NYPD and no opinion that would make it difficult to be impartial regarding the U.S. Attorney's Office.

1p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00015186

0p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 100

The government opposes Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed bail motion, arguing that she remains a flight risk due to the seriousness of the charges, strong evidence against her, and her financial resources and foreign ties. The court had previously denied bail after a thorough hearing, and the government contends that Maxwell's new bail package does not alter the court's prior finding.

36p
Dept. of JusticeDec 19, 2025

GRAND JURY [EFTA00008998]

GRAND JURY EXHIBIT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. S1 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) COUNT ONE (Conspiracy to Entice Minors to Travel to Engage in Illegal Sex Acts) The Grand Jury charges: OVERVIEW The char...

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.