Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta01250176DOJ Data Set 9Other

DS9 Document EFTA01250176

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta01250176
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 6:13:49 PM (UTC) Sent: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 6:11:08 PM (UTC) Subject: Epstein Rinaldo Rizzo From: To: Dea I represent tna o izzo, a potential witness in your Epstein case. As you will recall, we spoke about Mr. Rizzo back in March, when you reached out to see if Mr. Rizzo would speak to you and we agreed that you could. Although you have not contacted Mr. Rizzo, I thought you should know about some recent developments. For the last week or so the New York Times (Mike McIntire) has been aggressively reaching out to Mr. Rizzo, Jesse Rose (his employment lawyer) and me (who represented him in the Maxwell case) by email and phone, as well coming to Mr. Rizzo's home twice. He is seeking our comments and information concerning the Dubins and Mr. Rizzo's testimony in the Maxwell case. According to McIntire, the Times is planning to run story on the Dubins and their ties to Epstein. It also appears that the Times has a copy of all or a portion of the deposition Mr. Rizzo gave in the Maxwell case, which is troubling because it was subject to confidentiality in that case and, although the Second Circuit has ordered the unsealing of the summary judgment papers (which likely include references to Mr. Rizzo's deposition testimony), no mandate has issued or documents been unsealed. In addition, the Times tells us that a "representative" of the Dubins has told it that Mr. Rizzo "lied" in his deposition. If a representative did that, it is both defamatory and breaches a non-disparagement provision in the settlement agreement with Mr. Rizzo. The Times also informs that flight documents purportedly do not corroborate certain portions of Mr. Rizzo's deposition. We do not have access to those flight documents, but we understand that Epstein's flight documentation is incomplete, if not materially inaccurate. Also pursuant to his settlement of his employment dispute with the Dubins, Mr. Rizzo destroyed all of the documents he possessed pertaining to the Dubins, which might corroborate some of his testimony, We have rebuffed the Times' entreaties because of confidentiality obligations Rizzo has pursuant to a settlement agreement in the employment case and the confidentiality order in the Maxwell case, as well as his desire to avoid doing anything that would undermine your criminal prosecution. Should you need or want a copy of Mr. Rizzo's deposition transcript in the Maxwell case, we would provide it to you pursuant to subpoena. If you wish to discuss these matters, please do not hesitate to call. Best regards, Bob Lewis ROBERT V. LEWIS 3501.497-003 Page 1 of 2 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00096425 EFTA01250176 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this message and any attachment is confidential and may be subject to the attorney-client privilege, or others, ise protected from disclosure by applicable lass. Any disclosure, distribution, copying, or use of the information contained in this message or any attachment by anyone other than the intended recipient, regardless of address or routing, is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please telephone or email the sender and delete this message and any attachment from your system. 3501.497-003 Page 2 of 2 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00096426 EFTA01250177

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Wire Refreferences

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

FD.3024Rev.54.10)

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Jeffrey Epstein

Memo Re: Jeffrey Epstein Background Premise Jeffery Epstein is a Tier 3 registered sex offender with residences in the United States Virgin Islands, New York, New Mexico, Florida, and France. His registration compels compliance with SORNA (Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act). Legal Background On February 8, 2016 the President signed into law the "International Megan's Law to Prevent Child Exploitation and Other Sexual Crimes Through Advanced Notification of Traveling Sex Offenders." Among other things, this bill amends 42 U.S.C. § 16914 to require sex offenders to provide the relevant registration authority with "[ijnformation relating to intended travel of the sex offender outside the United States, including any anticipated dates and places of departure, arrival, or return, carrier and flight numbers for air travel, destination country and address or other contact information therein, means and purpose of travel, and any other itinerary or other travel-rela

6p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE

21p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

EXHIBIT Q

EXHIBIT Q EFTA00097394 Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 189 Filed 06/06/16 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X INNIErt INIMINME, Plaintiff, v. GHISLATNE MAXWELL, Defendant. X 15-cv-07433-RWS DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO EXCEED PRESUMPTIVE TEN DEPOSITION LIMIT Laura A. Menninger Jeffrey S. Pagliuca HADDON, MORGAN, AND FOREMAN, P.C. EFTA00097395 Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 189 Filed 06/06/16 Page 2 of 11 Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell ("Ms. Maxwell") files this Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Exceed Presumptive Ten Deposition Limit, and states as follows: INTRODUCTION Despite having taken only three depositions to date, Plaintiff prematurely requests permission to exceed the presumptive ten deposition limit imposed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(aX2)(A)(i) and to conduct 17 separate depositions, almost twice the limit. Without legal support, Plaintiff attempts to conflate the presumptive time limita

12p
Court UnsealedJan 4, 2024

Unsealed Jeffrey Epstein court papers

January 3, 2024 VIA ECF The Honorable Loretta A. Preska District Court Judge United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Re: Giuffre v. Maxwell, Case No. 15-cv-7433-LAP Dear Judge Preska, Pursuant to the Court’s December 18, 2023, unsealing order, and following conferral with Defendant, Plaintiff files this set of documents ordered unsealed. The filing of these documents ordered unsealed will be done on a rolling basis until c

943p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED /

CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED / FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) MATERIAL BSF RESPONSE TO GRAND JURY SUBPOENA v. Maxwell, 15 Civ. 7433 (RWS), S.D.N.Y. In Re: Grand Jury Subpoena, Sealed Order, 19 Misc. 149 (Apr. 9, 2019) PLEADINGS AND ORDERS 2016-2018 Pleadings (Related Sealed) 2015-2018 Orders (Related Sealed) DISCOVERY Rule 26 Disclosures (All) Discovery Requests and Responses (served) PRODUCTIONS Plaintiff's Production 000001 009349 Defendant's Productions MAXWELL 00001 01364 Non-Party Productions CASSELL 000001 014402 MAR-A-LAGO 0001 0607 000001 000558 000001 000009 VICTIMS_REFUSE_SILENCE 0001 0091 Deposition Transcripts (ALL) April 22, 2016 De osition of Ghislaine Maxwell May 3, 2016 Deposition of May 18, 2016 Deposition of May 20, 2016 Deposition of Sky Roberts May 24, 2016 Deposition of Lynn Trude Miller May 26, 2016 Deposition of Dr. Steven Olson June 1, 2016 Deposition Transcript of Juan Alessi June 3, 2016 Deposition of David Rodgers

4p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.