EFTA Document EFTA01298676

Date

Unknown

Source

DOJ Data Set 10

Reference

efta-efta01298676

Pages

Persons

Integrity

No Hash Available

Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

Download Original PDF

Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

0upvotesShare

Post Reddit

Save Post Watch

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure

Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.

Case 1:18-cv-07580-JPO Document 19 Filed 10/05/18 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MARVIN GERBER AND KALMA KOENIG, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Index No. I : I8-C V-07580 Plaintiffs, v. THE FINANCIAL TRUST COMPANY, XYZ CORPORATION, ABC, INC., and JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Defendants. NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a) PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, that MARVIN GERBER AND KALMA KOENIG, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, by and through their Counsel, hereby voluntarily dismiss the above-captioned action, without prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The dismissal is without costs to any party and this notice may be filed with the Clerk of the Court without further notice. Dated: New York, New York October 5, 2018 Respectfully submitted, HACH ROSE SCHIRRIPA & CHEVERIE LLP Hillary M. Mimi Frank R. Schirripa Daniel B. Rehns Hillary M. Nappi 112 Madison Avenue, 10th Floor New York, New York 10016 Telephone: Facsimile: Email Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class SDNY_GM_00063596 CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED R.QQN(EI DENTIAL DB-SDNY-0026421 EFTA_00174104 EFTA01298676 Case 1:18-cv-07580-JPO Document 19 Filed 10/05/18 Page 2 of 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Hillary M. Nappi, Esq., Counsel for MARVIN GERBER AND KALMA KOENIG, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, hereby certify that on October 5, 2018, I filed a true and correct copy of the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court for the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York via the Court's ECF/CM system, which automatically notifies all counsel of record in the above-captioned matter. Is/ Hillary M. Nappi Hillary M. Nappi SDNY_Giv1_00063597 CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED R.QP .NE I DENTIAL DB-SDNY-0026422 EFTA_00174105 EFTA01298677

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that other improper relationships exist between Government agents and Epstein. Please provide any documents, correspondence, and other information regarding the possibility of any improper relationship, including: a) involvement in and/or awareness of any aspect of the Government's criminal investigation and/or possible prosecution/non-prosecution of Epstein; b) Attorney liklimenvolvement in and/or awareness of the Government's interest."( witness, subject, or target of the Epstein investigation, including Sarah Ghislaine Maxwell, Nadia Marcinkova, Lesley Groff, Haley Robson, Louella Ruboyo, Larry Morrison, Larry Visoki, David Rogers, William Hammond, and Robert Roxburgh; c) All documents, correspondence, and other information reflecting telephone calls (includin telephone logs and telephone billing statements) made by or received by m Jeffrey Epstein, the Florida Science

DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02351991

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court upon Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 361); the United States's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 408); Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion to Compel Answers (DE 348) and Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Finding Waiver of Work Product and Similar Protections by Government and for Production of Documents (DE 414). The Motions are fully briefed and ripe for review. The Court has carefully considered the Motions and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. I. Background The facts, as culled from affidavits, exhibits, depositions, answers to interrogatories and reasonably inferred, for the purpose of these motions, are as follows: From betw

33p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Donate More ways to support →

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.