Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta01324976DOJ Data Set 10Correspondence

EFTA Document EFTA01324976

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-efta01324976
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading PDF viewer...

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: To: Subject: Date: Fwd: Next week - meet re: Jeffrey Epstein Sunday. February 24. 2019 8:18:01 PM Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Date: March 3, 2016 at 5:09:55 PM EST To: Subject: RE: Next week - meet re: Jeffrey Epstein Cool. Talk to you then. From: Sent: Thursday. March 03, 2016 5:05 PM To• Subject: RE: Next week - meet re: Jeffrey Epstein Tuesday at 4 is good. Thanks. From: Sent: Thursda March 03 2016 10:24 AM To: Subject: RE: Next week - meet re: Jeffrey Epstein Sure. Sounds both intriguing and complicated. Tuesday is better for me than Wednesday. How's Tuesday at 4 pm? From: Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 10:08 AM To: Subject: Next week - meet re: Jeffrey Epstein Hi= Earlier this week Pete Skinner and two other lawyers came in to pitch a sex trafficking case against Jeffrey Epstein, a financier with homes abroad, in FL, and in Manhattan. They represents who claims to have been prostituted by and for SDNY_GM_02742758 EF1'A_00229407 EFTA01324976 Epstein when she was 16 years old. Epstein apparently had dozens of victims, and it's not clear if/when his criminal conduct stopped. The facts are complicated, there are several related civil cases, and Epstein entered into a non-pros with the SDFL USAO in 2007 that is limited but obviously something to take into account. All that said, there are aspects of the facts here that are intriguing and I'd like to talk it over with you. I'm free next week Tuesday afternoon and all day Wednesday. Do you have time to meet then? Thanks, United States Attorney's Office Southern District of New York SDNY_GM_02742759 EFTA_00229408 EFTA01324977

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA02016959

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00014068

0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02414102

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that other improper relationships exist between Government agents and Epstein. Please provide any documents, correspondence, and other information regarding the possibility of any improper relationship, including: a) involvement in and/or awareness of any aspect of the Government's criminal investigation and/or possible prosecution/non-prosecution of Epstein; b) Attorney liklimenvolvement in and/or awareness of the Government's interest."( witness, subject, or target of the Epstein investigation, including Sarah Ghislaine Maxwell, Nadia Marcinkova, Lesley Groff, Haley Robson, Louella Ruboyo, Larry Morrison, Larry Visoki, David Rogers, William Hammond, and Robert Roxburgh; c) All documents, correspondence, and other information reflecting telephone calls (includin telephone logs and telephone billing statements) made by or received by m Jeffrey Epstein, the Florida Science

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02351991

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court upon Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 361); the United States's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 408); Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion to Compel Answers (DE 348) and Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Finding Waiver of Work Product and Similar Protections by Government and for Production of Documents (DE 414). The Motions are fully briefed and ripe for review. The Court has carefully considered the Motions and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. I. Background The facts, as culled from affidavits, exhibits, depositions, answers to interrogatories and reasonably inferred, for the purpose of these motions, are as follows: From betw

33p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.