Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta01355623DOJ Data Set 10Correspondence

EFTA Document EFTA01355623

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-efta01355623
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading PDF viewer...

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
C 0 00 Z-n Page 9 OO mm z z r > r- -o C *** THIS DATA IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY*" Copyright © 2009 CourtLink Corporation UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT -n o SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ?) (West Palm Beach) Doe No 102 v. Epstein cp PLAINTIFF: Jane Doe No 102 CD DEFENDANT: Epstein, Jeffrey AMICUS: United States of America DOCKET CASE NUMBER: 9:09cv80656 LEAD DOCKET CASE NUMBER: 9:08-cv-80119-K FILING DATE: 5/1/2009 JURISDICTION: Federal Question JUDGE: Marra. Kenneth A NATURE OF SUIT: 360 Personal Injury FILING TYPE: Civil CAUSE: Personal Injury28 USC 1391 JURY DEMAND: Plaintiff STATUS: Case Closed PLAINTIFF ATTORNEY(S): Ezell, Katherine Warthen [COR LD NTC] Podhurst Orseck Josefsberg Et Al City National Bank Building 25 W Flagler Street Suite 800 Miami, FL, USA 33130-1780 AI3R Research Profik modified 6' l21-2007 For internal use only Last EFTA01355623

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOES #1 and #2 I. UNITED STATES JOINT STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS The parties hereby stipulate and agree that the following facts are not in dispute and may be accepted as true: 1. Between about 2001 and 2006, defendant Jeffrey Epstein (a—billienaire—with—signifteant politieal-eenneetiens)-sexually-abusedinere-than-40 enticed into prostitution minor girls at his mansion in West Palm Beach, Florida, and elsewhere. Among the girls he sexually sed so enticed were Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2. Because Epstein, through others, used a means of interstate commerce and knowingly traveled in interstate commerce to engage in this conduct, te-abuse-Jane-Dee-#4-en43ane-Dee-#2-(and-the-ether-vietims), he committed violations of federal law, specifically repeated violations of 18 U.S.C. § 2422. 2. In 2006, at the request of the Palm Beach Police Department, the Federal Bureau of Inves

132p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00014192

0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

KnEusuctt-WAtsit,

KnEusuctt-WAtsit, COMPIANI & VARGAS, BA. SUITE 503, FLAGLER CENTER 501 SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE WEST PALM BEACH. FLORIDA 33401.5913 JANE KREUSLER-WALSH BARBARA J. COMPIANI REBECCA MERCIER VARGAS BOARD CERTIFIED APPELLATE LAWYERS By Hand Delivery Honorable Jeffrey Colbath Palm Beach County Courthouse Fifteenth Judicial Circuit 205 North Dixie Highway, Room 11F West Palm Beach, FL 33401 June 30, 2009 Re: Epstein v. State of Florida 15th Circuit Court Case No. 2008CF009381A Dear Judge Colbath: TELEPHONE (56 1) 659-6455 FACSIMILE (561) 820-8762 Enclosed is a copy of Epstein's Emergency Petition for Writ of Certiorari, Emergency Motion to Review Denial of Stay, Motion to Use One Appendix and Motion to Seal, as filed with the Fourth District Court of Appeal. Due to the volume of the appendix, we have only enclosed the table of contents. Please let us know if you wish to receive a copy of the appendix. Thank you. Very truly yours, E KREUSLER-WALSH JKW/bl Enclosure cc

114p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 261 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/08/2014 Page 1 of 2

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 261 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/08/2014 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE I and JANE DOE 2, Plaintiffs 1. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant INTERVENOR EPSTEIN'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR A SUPPLEMENTAL PROTECTIVE ORDER Now comes Intervenor, Jeffrey Epstein, who moves that this Honorable Court issue a supplemental Protective Order that would expand the limited Protective Order allowed in its decision Granting in Part and Denying in Part the Intervenors' Motion for a Protective Confidentiality Order. [D.E. 255 at 4]. The purpose of the proposed supplement to the previously ordered Protective Order is to require that any party would be required to file under seal any portion of the plea negotiation correspondence between the Government and Epstein's counsel, whether offered as an exhibit or quoted from in the content of a pleading or motion. Such a redacted filing

4p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01355633

0p
Dept. of JusticeSep 16, 2019

Court ruling against rescinding Jeffrey Epstein non-prosecution agreement

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 478 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/16/2019 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES of AMERICA, Respondent. _____________________________________/ OPINION AND ORDER1 This cause is before the Court upon Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Submissions on Proposed Remedies (DE 458); the Government’s Response to Petitioners’ Submission on Proposed Remedies (DE 462);

15p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.