Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta01356257DOJ Data Set 10Correspondence

EFTA Document EFTA01356257

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-efta01356257
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading PDF viewer...

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
New or Existing Relationship? If yes, please include relationship since date, approx I of accounts. AUM. etc.) Legal name of Account Holder(s) Name of UBO(s) (Please include UBOs who own 25% and more, It there are multiple layers, please include description of ownership structure) Description of Type of account being opened with detailed purpose of the accounts (Please include SOW information/ Geographic location/ For Entity Accounts: Description of the entity and background information on the U80) Reason for High Risk PEP (Y/N) If yes. include details Any negative media and/or court cases? Include ALL negative media 8 court cases :If Yes, please give details Business Justification for the relationship despite High Risk Factors Kind regards, Cynthia Rodriguez Existing relationship since 8/26/2013. A total of 21 deposit accounts and 3 money market accounts for multiple entities, 5 brokerage accounts and 1 custody account. Total AUMs $224mn. Zorro Management, LLC Jeffrey Epstein We are opening checking account for new entity, Zorro Management LLC This relationship is deemed high risk due to multiple court cases on Jeffrey Epstein, involving 22 April 2004 SEC filed a settled civil fraud action for illegal insider trading in three publicly traded Massachusetts banks. Final judgement permanently enjoins him from violating the antifruad provisions and he agreed to pay a total of $72532.06 in disgorgement of trading profits, prejudgment interest and civil penalties. Epstein was sentenced to 21 months in federal prison for three counts of fraud, sexually assaulting a girl and solicitation of prostitution. These alerts were previously approved by senior management and AML Compliance. Prior clearance is attached as a reference No Yes Aside from the court cases listed in the reason for high risk, all other alerts were false positives and no new court cases or negative media has come up for this client. All negative media and alerts have been reviewed by AML Compliance and they do not see a reason to discontinue the existing relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) DB-SDNY-0042033 CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00188217 EFTA01356257

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA02016959

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00014068

0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02414102

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that other improper relationships exist between Government agents and Epstein. Please provide any documents, correspondence, and other information regarding the possibility of any improper relationship, including: a) involvement in and/or awareness of any aspect of the Government's criminal investigation and/or possible prosecution/non-prosecution of Epstein; b) Attorney liklimenvolvement in and/or awareness of the Government's interest."( witness, subject, or target of the Epstein investigation, including Sarah Ghislaine Maxwell, Nadia Marcinkova, Lesley Groff, Haley Robson, Louella Ruboyo, Larry Morrison, Larry Visoki, David Rogers, William Hammond, and Robert Roxburgh; c) All documents, correspondence, and other information reflecting telephone calls (includin telephone logs and telephone billing statements) made by or received by m Jeffrey Epstein, the Florida Science

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02351991

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court upon Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 361); the United States's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 408); Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion to Compel Answers (DE 348) and Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Finding Waiver of Work Product and Similar Protections by Government and for Production of Documents (DE 414). The Motions are fully briefed and ripe for review. The Court has carefully considered the Motions and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. I. Background The facts, as culled from affidavits, exhibits, depositions, answers to interrogatories and reasonably inferred, for the purpose of these motions, are as follows: From betw

33p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.