Case File
efta-efta01358957DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceEFTA Document EFTA01358957
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-efta01358957
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Page 24
874 F.3d 787, *; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 20596, fl;
Bankr. L. Rep. (CCH) P83,176; 64 Bankr. Ct. Dec. 216
[HN11] A "make-whole" premium is a contractual substitute for interest lost on notes that
are redeemed before their expected due date. Its purpose is to ensure that a lender is
compensated for being paid earlier than the original maturity of its loan for the interest it
will not receive.
Bankruptcy Law > Practice & Proceedings > Appeals > Jurisdiction
Bankruptcy Law > Reorganizations > Plans > Postconfirmation > Effects of
Confirmation
Civil Procedure > Appeals > Dismissals of Appeals > Involuntary Dismissals
[HN12] The principle of "equitable mootness" is a prudential doctrine that is invoked to
avoid disturbing a reorganization plan once it is implemented. The doctrine allows
appellate courts to dismiss bankruptcy appeals when, during the pendency of an appeal,
events occur such that even though effective relief could conceivably be fashioned,
implementation of that relief would be inequitable. The doctrine requires an appellate court
to carefully balance the importance of finality in bankruptcy proceedings against ane
appellant's right to review and relief.
Bankruptcy Law > Reorganizations > Plans > Postconfirmation > Effects of
Confirmation
Bankruptcy Law > Practice & Proceedings > Appeals > Jurisdiction
Civil Procedure > Judgments > Entry of Judgments > Stays Pending Appeals >
Nonmoney Judgments
Civil Procedure > Appeals > Dismissals of Appeals > Involuntary Dismissals
[HN13] Where a reorganization plan has been substantially consummated, the United
States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit presumes that an appeal of that plan is
equitably moot. That presumption, however, gives way where five factors the Second
Circuit first identified in In re Chateaugay Corp. ("Chateaugay II") are met. They are,
where: (i) effective relief can be ordered; (ii) relief will not affect the debtor's reemergence;
(iii) relief will not unravel intricate transactions; (iv) affected third-parties are notified and
able to participate in the appeal; and (v) an appellant diligently sought a stay of the
reorganization plan. Although the Second Circuit requires satisfaction of each Chateaugay
II factor to overcome a mootness presumption, it has placed significant reliance on the fifth
factor, concluding that a chief consideration under Chateaugay II is whether an appellant
sought a stay of confirmation. Along those lines, the Second Circuit concluded in In re
Metromedia, that if a stay was sought, it will provide relief if it is at all feasible, that is,
unless relief would knock the props out from under the authorization for every transaction
that has taken place and create an unmanageable, uncontrollable situation for the
bankruptcy court.
Bankruptcy Law > Practice & Proceedings > Appeals > Jurisdiction
Bankruptcy Law > Reorganizations > Plans > Postconfirmation > Effects of
Confirmation
Civil Procedure > Appeals > Dismissals of Appeals > Involuntary Dismissals
[HN14] Equitable mootness issues only arise in earnest following a judicial determination
that some facet of a reorganization plan violates the Bankruptcy Code. It is generally
considered inappropriately harsh to deny relief to which one is entitled on the purportedly
For internal use only
For internal use only
CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e)
DB-SDNY-0046943
CONFIDENTIAL
SDNY_GM_00193127
EFTA01358957
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.