Case File
efta-efta01361047DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceEFTA Document EFTA01361047
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-efta01361047
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Gave no details on the following-
•
A DEPOSIT was also received during the reviewing period. ??? RESPONSES: I stated in my write up a CHECK
was received, as well as provide the person who sent the check to the client
•
LAUREL, INC, ??
•
What does this mean? "BNP PARIBAS IBAN:
SSB REF#
It tells me
nothing. Should indicate $5,535.84 wire to Cabinet Experton SPRL referencing invoices or July -
Sept * RESPONSES: My write up indicated Disbursement of Funds - I have only provided the financial institution
information in the past with no issues and ou have a
roved
•
SOCIETE GENERALE SSB
IBAN:
?? Should indicate
FFC to Mlle
in France RESPONSES: My write up indicated Disbursement of Funds I have only
provided the financial Institution information in the past with no issues and ou have approved
•
SWEDBANK SSB
IBAN:
??? RESPONSES: My write up
indicated Disbursement of funds I have only provided the financial institution information in the past with no issues
and you have approved
•
CREDIT LYONNAIS SSB REF#
IBAN:
SORT CODE:
RIB CODE
17 ?? RESPONSES: My write up indicated Distribution of funds I have only provided the financial
institution information in the past with no issues and you have approved
Once again, the timing of your communication is extremely alarming — you have always approved my Jeffery Epstein
cases in this same write up manner in the past with no issues See
but today, you are
highlighting imperfections and changes to the process. Which brings me back to the retaliation theory.
Agreed-
Case --
complete error on my part
sample checks.
Case
— No Summary was attached
my case write up did not upload properly.
approval
Case
- No Summary was attached
my case write up did not upload properly.
approval
— uploaded the incomplete case summary that did not included a list of
- As advised, not sure what transpired large case items were uploaded and
Once advised, case write up was immediately attached. Pending your
- As advised, not sure what transpired large case items were uploaded and
Once advised, case write up was immediately attached. Pending your
From: Cherie Quigley
Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2016 3:35 PM
To: Tammy McFadden
Subject: RE: PRIME CASES - RETURNS/COMMENTS [C]
Classification: Confidential
I don't review cases every day and 2 of the S that were returned had no summary attached.
It just happened to be a day that I was reviewing cases.
Case
- the Profile was incorrect, for which you stated but didn't update
Cases
- You indicated that you uploaded the incomplete case summary
CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e)
DB-SDNY-0049849
CONFIDENTIAL
SDNY_GM_00196033
EFTA01361047
Technical Artifacts (4)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
SWIFT/BIC
GENERALESWIFT/BIC
LYONNAISSWIFT/BIC
SWEDBANKWire Ref
referencingForum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.