Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta01365966DOJ Data Set 10Correspondence

EFTA Document EFTA01365966

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-efta01365966
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading PDF viewer...

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Adrienne/dear all. Please find enclosed my final comments for amendments. Adrienne/Emily: As per Sheffalis email from earlier this morning I understand that deck needs to be completed and handed out to Fabrizio by 10am tomorrow hence we may have have a chance to review again via call. Having said that please call me for final questions you have while also taking into consideration that I will be on my way to Jax tomorrow morning hence airborne most of the time (ETA9am) Thanks. Exec summary slide 2 In general can we pls make sure that all numbers listed here match with follow up slides and tables. Example: first bullet refers to May HR cases having been reversed back to 60 which is reflected on slide 2 but not on slide 7, latter stating 79. Since both slides2 and 7 refer to smooth out schedule (slide 7 also shared with Irwin for global AFC approval) neutral reader should expect those numbers to match it provide foot note why they deviate. AB: Already addressed Second bullet. Apologies but while I can reconcile 199 approved YTD trough may I cannot recon the 258. Summarizing numbers on slide3 is 342 vs 312 slide 7, none show 258. AB: Already addressed Second bullet on process and quality: Can we pls add and specify that 48hr rejection turnaround only applies to "cases where no client engagement is required". AB: Added wording/ appended latest version Third bullet under ABR section. Typo at last line, should say "expected" not "excepted" correct? AB: Already addressed 4th bullet offboarding: open suggestion but should we also refer to idea that we consider synergies by piggybacking off CRP client closure program? Should we also mention that new offboarding KOP are in process of being finalized (Armen)? AB: there is no real-state left on slide 1 and this is something that we can talk to If space can we add one more bullet referring to "global AFC review and KYC sample testing completed last week with upcoming recommmendation also to be embedded in SII filing" AB: Added wording / appended latest version (last bullet on slide 2 although it does not topically fit under the 3 Levers heading) As mentioned I can we make sure that numbers on slides 2 and 7 match to most possible extent or provide Asterix to explain any deviations. AB: Already addressed Adrienne, can we also add the last slide 6 for. Irwin's deck from May 31st as additional appendix slide in this deck? This was the excellent color chart comparing smooth out with policy target dates for HR Jan has asked for several times. While we shared this with afc (I also forwarded to Jan Wa and Julie) we should add here showing that we covered this task. AB: This was included in the original deck, Sheffali required to remove it That's all I have (for now) :-) Thanks everybody Oliver On Jun 9, 2018, at 14:01, Emily Craig <[email protected]> wrote: Classification: Confidential CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) DB-SDNY-0057437 CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00203621 EFTA01365966

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.