Case File
efta-efta01459057DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceEFTA Document EFTA01459057
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-efta01459057
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Deutsche Bank
Markets Research
North America
United States
US Equity Insights
2016 S&P EPS growth to surge to 5%!
Falling standards of excellence this cycle. Is there an objective passing grade?
We reduce 2016E S&P EPS from $128 to $125. We're unsure of the tone of
language appropriate to describe this reduction. Slashing or even cutting is too
harsh as our new estimate is merely 2.5% lower. This trimming shouldn't
surprise investors given recent commodity and currency markets. So is $125
good S&P EPS in 2016? Is it bullish or bearish? It's only 5% growth, subnormal
mid-cycle real EPS growth, but 10x better than 2015. Thus, S&P EPS growth is
set to surge in 2016! But is there an objectively healthy S&P EPS growth rate?
In this note we present our new 2016E S&P EPS and we explain why a healthy
S&P EPS growth rate is the nominal cost of equity less the dividend yield.
2016 S&P EPS :Alt trorn $128 to $125 on stronger dollur lower oil ossurnptions
We have long cautioned that every 10% appreciation in the dollar vs. mature
currencies drags on S&P EPS growth by 2.5%. Every dime the Euro declines
vs. USD hits S&P EPS by $1. Every $5/bbl oil price decline hits S&P EPS by $1,
net of small benefits outside of Energy, Industrial Capital Goods & Materials;
which all suffer. Airlines, Consumer Staples & Discretionary firms benefit from
lower oil prices, but most of the cost savings is passed forward to customers.
We lower our average 2016 Euro assumption from about $1.10 to $1.05. We
raise our 2016 avg. DXY assumption from about 95 to 100. We lower our 2016
avg. oil price assumption from $60/bbl to $55/bbl and natural gas to $2.75. We
also tempered our growth assumptions at US Retailers, Housing and Banks.
2015 did not have healthy underlying revenue or EPS growth ex oil and dollar
S&P sales and operating EPS growth was broadly weak in 2015. Weakness
extended beyond commodity producers and FX drags at multinationals. A
surge in airline profits masked a significant Industrial Cap Goods profit decline.
Revenue was flat at Financials with EPS growth from less litigation than 2014.
No growth at Consumer Staples despite lower input costs. Good growth at
Retailers, but disappointing given the macro tailwinds owing to fierce price
competition. Strong at auto, but home builders disappointed. The strongest
growth was at Health Care and consumer oriented Tech firms. Corporate tech
spending on equip. and software remains very sluggish and chip makers were
flattish on earnings given slow PC, handset and weak industrial end markets.
Ex. Energy, Financials, HC and AAPL. AMZN & GOOG 2015 S&P EPS growth is
-2.5%; this is the underlying trend with -4% FX drag that should fall to -1.5%.
Stronger revenue growth is key to achieving healthy S&P EPS growth in 2016
Strong revenue growth at Health Care, better capex on productivity enhancers
like tech equip/software, slower but still strong revenue growth at consumer
oriented big cap Tech are key to our 4% S&P sales growth, 1% share shrink
and flat net margin estimates for 2016. Some cyclically risky sectors like Auto,
Airlines, Chemicals & Semiconductors must avoid losing any earnings power.
Margin expansion is possible but upside counterbalanced by downside risk
Fierce price competition at Retailers, more global competition at Industrials and the
political threats at Health Care pose some sales risk, but mostly margin risk. There
is also tax rate risk. Many are concerned about wage preqm ire on margins, but this
is not a major risk for S&P firms. However, a tighter than expected labor market
could lead to more Fed hikes than expected and thus EPS risks via dollar, oil or PE
risk via credit market or a Tsy yield jump. Fed hikes are a small boost to S&P EPS.
delineates healthy from unhealthy S&P EPS growth and supports an
Our 1 year target of 18x trailing S&P EPS uses a 5.5% real and 7.5% nominal CoE.
EPS is retained, so real EPS g must = real CoE - div yld to justify a PE = 1/real CoE.
20 November 2015
David Bianco
Jo Wang
Sisal kit
&m
ist
Winn's' Tim
Strategist
:).., ',re, k',.. lam,:::.?
Price
2089.17
Next 5%+ move Balanced
Risk
2014
2015E
Yearend Target
2058.90
2050.
2100
EPS
$118
$119
Target PIE
17.4x
17.4x
Current P/E
17.7x
17.6x
0PS
$38.30
$41
2016E
2250-
2300
$125
18.2x
16.7x
$44
'Related recent research
0,11,1
S&P should finish the year In
16 Nov 2015
black, but more red ahead for
Energy
Amazing margins, but mind the
8 Nov 2015
GAAP
A structural slowing of
1 Nov 2015
Industrials: Investing around this
late cycle risk
Don't pull the plug on Health
23 Oct 2015
Care
VS Entail( Strategy Baskets
High Foreign Cash (Repatriation
Beneliciaries)
Big-Cap Reasonable PE Tech
Challenged Industrial Capital
Goods
US Domestic Strength
elejenillbee
ckerg
DBUSHIFC
DBUSBRTE
DBUSCICG
DBUS0MST
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
Deutsche Bank does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. Thus, investors should
be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should
consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. DISCLOSURES AND ANALYST
CERTIFICATIONS ARE LOCATED IN APPENDIX 1. MCI (P) 124/04/2015.
CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e)
CONFIDENTIAL
DB-SDNY-0119270
SDNY_GM_00265454
EFTA01459057
Technical Artifacts (3)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
SWIFT/BIC
DBUSBRTESWIFT/BIC
DBUSCICGSWIFT/BIC
DBUSHIFCForum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.