Skip to main content
Skip to content

Duplicate Document

This document appears to be a copy. The original version is:

EFTA Document EFTA01480876
Case File
efta-efta01480876DOJ Data Set 10Correspondence

EFTA Document EFTA01480876

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-efta01480876
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Confidential Due Diligence Report UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA (West Palm Beach) Doe V. Epstein PLAINTIFF: Jane Doe DEFENDANT: Jeffrey Epstein Amicus: United States of America Material Witness: Jean Luc Bruhnel DOCKET CASE NUMBER: 9:08cv80893 FILING DATE: 8/13/2008 JURISDICTION: Federal Question JUDGE: Kenneth A. Marra REFERRED TO: Magistrate Judge Linnea R. Johnson NATURE OF SUIT: 360 Personal Injury FILING TYPE: Civil CAUSE: no cause specified JURY DEMAND: Plaintiff STATUS: Case Closed PLAINTIFF ATTORNEY(S): Bradley James Edwards [LEAD ATTORNEY:ATTORNEY TO] DEFENDANT ATTORNEY(S): Jack Alan Goldber.er LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO Michael James Pike [ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED] Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman Robert Deweese Critton, Jr. [LEAD ATTORNEY:ATTORNEY TO] Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman Joseph Laurence Ackerman, Jr. [ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED] Fowler White Burnett, P.A. Lilly Ann Sanchez [LEAD ATTORNEY;ATTORNEY TO] The LS Law Firm Confidential - This report is not to be disseminated or photocopied to any third party without the express consent of Global Security tti Investigations. 104749084A 30 Confidential Treatment Requested by JPMorgan Chase CONFIDENTIAL JPM-SDNY-00003111 SDNY_GM_00272309 EFTA01480876

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Case #9:08CV80893

Related Documents (6)

Dept. of JusticeFeb 21, 2019

Epstein

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. _____________________________________/ OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court upon Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 361); the United States’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 408); Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's

33p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Florida lawyer files motion alleging Jeffrey Epstein forced Jane Doe #3 to have sex with Alan Dershowitz, Prince Andrew and other powerful figures

The filing directly links a high‑profile lawyer (Alan Dershowitz) and a senior British royal (Prince Andrew) to alleged sex‑trafficking by Jeffrey Epstein, and claims a broader network of “prominent A Brad Edwards filed a motion in U.S. District Court (West Palm Beach) to add Jane Doe #3 and #4 to an Jane Doe #3 alleges Epstein forced her to have sex with Alan Dershowitz and Prince Andrew, among o

3p
OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 329 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/23/2015 Page 1 of 2

DOJ EFTA Data Set 10 document EFTA01325031

20p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01325031

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 329 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/23/2015 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' NOTICE OF FILING SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL PRIVILEGE LOG Pursuant to the Court's June IS, 2013 Omnibus Order (DE 190), the Respondent, United States of America, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States At

20p
Dept. of JusticeFeb 21, 2019

Read the judge's ruling

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. _____________________________________/ OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court upon Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 361); the United States’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 408); Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's

33p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01481978

106p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.