EFTA Document EFTA01480887

EFTA01382001

Attorney roster and discovery objection dispute in Edwards & Cassell v. Dershowitz (Case 9:08‑cv‑80736‑KAM)

The passage merely lists counsel, paralegals, and procedural objections in a civil case. It contains no specific allegations, financial transactions, or connections to high‑level officials that would Names of numerous attorneys and paralegals representing parties in the case. Reference to discovery objections that may be used to withhold information. Mention of the case Edwards and Cassell vs. De

EFTA01387839

Epstein Depositions

10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps

Attorney roster and discovery objection dispute in Edwards & Cassell v. Dershowitz (Case 9:08‑cv‑80736‑KAM)

Attorney roster and discovery objection dispute in Edwards & Cassell v. Dershowitz (Case 9:08‑cv‑80736‑KAM) The passage merely lists counsel, paralegals, and procedural objections in a civil case. It contains no specific allegations, financial transactions, or connections to high‑level officials that would merit investigative follow‑up. The only potential lead is the involvement of Alan Dershowitz, a high‑profile attorney, but the document does not link him to any misconduct beyond routine discovery disputes. Key insights: Names of numerous attorneys and paralegals representing parties in the case.; Reference to discovery objections that may be used to withhold information.; Mention of the case Edwards and Cassell vs. Dershowitz (Case 9:08‑cv‑80736‑KAM).

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT