Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta01683603DOJ Data Set 10Correspondence

EFTA Document EFTA01683603

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-efta01683603
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
3/525.8:10 AM Serials O Freeze Ust Overall Classification Overall Classification: SECRET//NOFORN Filing and Security Primary Case: Serial Number. Case Title: Serialized: Category: Initiated: Additional Case: Serial Number: Case Title: Serialized: I i i 802 (U) RESTRICTED -Access Denied 11/09/2020 Full Investigation 12/19/1997 p 539 (U) EPSTEIN, JEFFREY; CHILD SEX TRAFFICKING 11/09/2020 Document Title: (S//NE Document Synopsis: (S//NF Administrative Notes: (U) Techniques utilized in gathering the below information are extremely sensitive and ongoing. Every effort should be made to safeguard these techniques and resulting source information. Details: (U) Spe New ad_were selected to digi dence from four devices that a ectly involved with Jeffery Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell child sex trafficking case. The scope of the case fell outside of the normal parameters of the NYONLP workload, but due to the experience and maturity level of the SSs selected, the data reviewe rocessed would have little or no effect, nor hamper squad_abilities to provide accurate, reliable, and relev vice to the customer squad. UO h the objectives set by Special Agent (SA) of SSs were to review four devices for respo nt label/bookmark material/s for evidence 1/3 EFTA01683603 3/5/25.8:10 AM Sedals collection for review by the Assistant United States Attorney Office (AUSA) and meet the discovery deadline of November 9, 2020. The protocol established by the Warrant, was for each SS to review the search warrant and accompanying affidavit pursuant to which the materials were produced or seized. Then each member of the review team was assigned to conduct a file- by-file review of the images and videos from a particular subset of the devices. Files falling into any of the following categories shall be considered responsive to the Warrant: • Any image or video of • Any image or video of • Any image or video of age of 30 • Any travel documents, immigration forms • Any screenshots of • Any screenshots of regarding females Jeffrey Epstein Ghislaine Maxwell any female appearing to be under the such as passports, visas, or communications with or regarding social media posts featuring or females (U//FOUO) Upon identifying any file that falls within one of the above categories, the reviewer shall take the following steps: • If the image or video contains partial or full nudity, mark the file RESPONSIVE - HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL • If the image contains no nudity of any kind, mark the file RESPONSIVE - CONFIDENTIAL (U//FOUO) The four machines assigned and reviewed by SSs are as follows: (U//FOLIO) Due to SSs abilities to conduct themselves in a professional ma d to remain focused on the mission, we were able to process an enormous amount of data in a relatively short amount of time, thus allowing squad C-20 to deliver evidence to the AUSA before the aforementioned discovery deadline. Indexing 2/3 EFTA01683604 3/5/25, 8:10AM Serials Display Name Enterprise Role Entity Role Entity Type US Person o RESTRICTED- Main Person Citizenship Unknown 1= 1 Access Denied o RESTRICTED- Reference Person Citizenship Unknown 1= 1 Access Denied Items per page: 40 - 1 - 2 of 2 Intelligence Intelligence Value: 0 None O Potential Potential IIR/SIR? NO Sentinel Tags: No Sentinel Tags Selected Can you identify the source of No this information? From: Drafted By: Distribution: NEW YORK Approved By: 3/3 EFTA01683605

Related Documents (6)

House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Epstein Reputation Management Email Reveals Paid SEO/Hacking Campaign to Suppress Negative Coverage

The email provides concrete details about a paid operation to manipulate search results for Jeffrey Epstein, including payments, specific tactics, and references to high‑profile associates. It suggest Epstein hired a contractor (Mike) for $2,500 plus a pending $7,500 to run SEO and hacking services. The operation involved removing negative articles, altering Wikipedia, replacing mug‑shot images, a

3p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Anecdotal recollections linking Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Prince Andrew, and high‑profile financiers

The passage offers personal impressions and vague connections but provides no concrete evidence, dates, transactions, or actionable leads. It mentions well‑known figures, but only in a speculative, go Author claims to have met Epstein and Maxwell at parties and describes their behavior. Mentions Prince Andrew walking with Epstein and suggests a possible business‑related motive. References financie

2p
Dept. of JusticeDec 19, 2025

GRAND JURY [EFTA00008998]

GRAND JURY EXHIBIT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. S1 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) COUNT ONE (Conspiracy to Entice Minors to Travel to Engage in Illegal Sex Acts) The Grand Jury charges: OVERVIEW The char...

1p
Financial RecordUnknown

Invoice Number: 4.013-86582

DOJ EFTA Data Set 10 document EFTA01313161

9p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01297934

"Darren Indyke" AND allegation OR arrest OR bribe OR convict OR corrupt OR court O... Page 1 of 2 Goggle *Clew IndyMC AND elligetton OR east OR bribe OR convict CR corrupt OR O All News 'arcs I,na9pn Maps Mtn - con /}n' ,y-. 12 resettle :0 2 roorde; Exclusive: New York attorney general seeks information on financier ... vAwr refort.CCWAIrtele2CISC0MtnagnIcinl.:^areynUSKBN0M2D0V2C15DXS Mos . North Korea Cnannes &Kew ror.ed Epstein's Lawyer Darren Indyke to cup*n why Easter(' foun

2p
House OversightUnknown

Document alleges extensive financial, academic, and sexual ties between Jeffrey Epstein, Alan Dershowitz, and high‑profile figures including Leslie Wexner, Harvard officials, and political elites

Document alleges extensive financial, academic, and sexual ties between Jeffrey Epstein, Alan Dershowitz, and high‑profile figures including Leslie Wexner, Harvard officials, and political elites The passage provides numerous specific allegations – dates, dollar amounts, meetings, and alleged quid‑pro quo arrangements – that could be pursued for evidence of financial flows, abuse of influence, and coordinated legal obstruction. It implicates powerful actors (Wexner, Harvard leadership, a U.S. state attorney, and potentially members of the British royal family) and suggests systematic surveillance and intimidation of investigators. While many claims are unverified and some are repetitive, the level of detail (e.g., $30 M investment, $1 mansion sale, non‑prosecution agreement clause protecting co‑conspirators) makes it a strong investigative lead. Key insights: 1996 meeting on Epstein’s jet linking Dershowitz to Leslie Wexner’s birthday party.; Epstein’s claim that Wexner sold a Manhattan mansion to him for $1.; 1997 $30 M investment in Boston Provident allegedly sourced from Wexner, with half‑million from Dershowitz.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.