Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta01733759DOJ Data Set 10Correspondence

EFTA Document EFTA01733759

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-efta01733759
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading PDF viewer...

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Dear Alex: Consistent with Mr. Epstein's continued exercise of his best efforts to maintain full compliance with the terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement, we write to inform you of new information we have just received from the Palm Beach County Sheriffs Office. As part of the normal step down process customarily implemented by the Sheriffs Office with respect to inmates similarly situated to Mr. Epstein, and in accordance with the usual and customary progression from the work release phase of incarceration, the Sheriffs Office has informed Mr. Epstein of its desire to implement the next step of home incarceration of Mr. Epstein under 24 hour, 7 day a week GPS monitoring by Sheriffs deputies. We believe that the continued incarceration of Mr. Epstein by the County Sheriff under this next step of the process would not violate the terms of the Non- Prosecution Agreement However, in an abundance of caution, we write to inform the United States Attorney's Office of the Sheriffs desire inorder to avoid any misunderstandings that may arise on either side. Although you recently informed us that you have recused yourself from participation in Mr. Epstein's case, inasmuch as you, yourself, personally negotiated the terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement, we thought it would be appropriate to inform you of these new developments. We believe that your statement that the contract terms of the final document should be our guide. might help clarify any issues that may arise with other members of your staff . As you and if necessary your staff consider these developments, we believe that the following points will clarify why this next phase of incarceration does not violate the provisions of the Non-Prosecution Agreement: 1. Under the relevant terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement, Mr. Epstein was required to "make a binding recommendation that the Court impose a thirty (30) month sentence to be divided as follows: (a) Epstein shall be sentenced to consecutive terms of twelve (12) months and six (6) months in county jail for all charges, without any opportunity for withholding adjudication or sentencing, and without probation or community control in lieu of imprisonment." Moreover, the agreement states that Mr. Epstein was obligated "to use his best efforts to convince the Judge of the 13th Judicial Circuit to accept Epstein's binding recommendation regarding the sentence to be imposed ..." Clearly, Mr. Epstein has done both. [A] Judge of the 15"' Judicial Circuit accepted and executed the sentence", EFTA_R1_00009205 EFTA01733759 as required by the third term of the Non-Prosecution Agreement, and Mr. Epstein is currently serving precisely the sentence required under the terms of the Non- Prosecution Agreement Not only has Mr. Epstein been serving this sentence, but the specifics of his incarceration have exceeded even that which the Judge, herself, required. The Judge did not order that Mr. Epstein serve his sentence in solitary confinement for the first three months of his incarceration, nor that his outside time, be limited to an average of only 4 hours per week. Yet those terms, which were within the purview of the Sheriffs Office, were accepted and served by Mr. Epstein without complaint 2. The United States Attorneys Office the very next day after the Mr Epstein began serving his sentence notified the sheriff that they acknowledged that the conditions of custody were in the discretion of his office "so long as he is treated like any other similarly situated inmate in the county system". 3. Alternative custody is granted by the Sheriffs Office as part of a long standing program. It is administered, implemented and monitored exclusively by Sheriffs Office Deputies , separate and apart from any program administered by the Florida State Department of Corrections, including the sentence of community control (discussed in point 5 below). Among the phases of the alternative custody program administered by the Palm Beach County Sheriff are work release and home confinement Both work release and home confinement are granted by the Sheriffs Office pursuant to the identical eligibility requirements. As Mr. Epstein has already satisfied the eligibility requirements for work release, he is also eligible for the home confinement phase of county incarceration under the alternative custody program. Inasmuch as we have already agreed that the admission of Mr. Epstein to the county's alternative custody program of incarceration on the same terms as similarly situated county inmates does not violate the terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement, Mr. Epstein's participation in the next progressive step of that same alternative custody program should also not be in violation of the Non-Prosecution Agreement 4. Home confinement is normal part of the usual and customary progressive step down used to reintegrate inmates back into society. Presently approximately 200 county inmates serve their county sentences in home confinement But home confinement is itself, only one step in the overall progression from strictly supervised institutional incarceration to strictly monitored and supervised alternative custody. This is a well established program of the Palm beach Sheriffs Office . You have confirmed to me on several occasions your agreement that once Mr. Epstein was Mr. Epstein was convicted, sentenced and began serving the sentence imposed by the State of Florida, the United States Attorneys Office would not involve itself in the ordinary administration of Mr. Epstein's sentence by county and state officials. EFTA_R1_00009206 EFTA01733760 S. Home confinement in the County's alternative custody program differs dramatically from community control., which is strictly administered by the Florida State Department of Corrections. Home confinement is an alternative form of county incarceration administered exclusively by the County Sheriff's Office and its law enforcement personnel. The inmate is still considered in the custody of the Sheriff. It requires the inmates continued presence within the confines of the four walls of the home, [except when the inmate travels to and from an eligible work location]. The inmates continued presence within the confines of the home is monitored 24 hours and day, 7 days a week by Sheriffs deputies through the use of an ankle bracelet and a GPS monitoring system. If the inmate leaves the confines of the home without permission, deputies are authorized to arrest the inmate immediately. Community Control on the other hand is a form of State administered probation monitored by its probation department and case officers . A person serving community control is not under constant monitoring, but rather must report at least once a week to his case officer (as opposed to once a month for those on regular probation). They are subject to an evening curfew, and a multitude of other restrictions that may be imposed by the judge. In conclusion , the Sheriff's office has suggested to Mr. Epstein that it was now appropriate for him to begin the next level of alternative custody, and we have advised Mr Epstein that his availing himself of the same opportunity given to other inmates similarly situated would not violate his non- prosecution agreement . If there are any questions please feel free to contact me . jay EFTA_R1_00009207 EFTA01733761

Related Documents (6)

Dept. of JusticeJul 22, 2021

Deferred prosecution agreement

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, vs. FIRSTENERGY CORP., Defendant. CASE NO. ____________ JUDGE BLACK DEFERRED PROSECUTION AGREEMENT The United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Ohio (“USAO-SDOH” or “government”) and the Defendant, FirstEnergy Corp., by its undersigned representative and counsel, pursuant to the authority granted by the Board of Directors, agree as follows: 1. Criminal Information

49p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01337179

0p
Dept. of JusticeAug 22, 2017

15 July 7 2016 - July 17 2016 working progress_Redacted.pdf

Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Irons, Janet < Tuesday, July 12, 2016 10:47 AM Richard C. Smith     Hello Warden Smith,     mother is anxious to hear the results of your inquiry into her daughter's health.   I'd be grateful if you could  email or call me at your earliest convenience.  I'm free today after 2 p.m.  Alternatively, we could meet after the Prison  Board of Inspectors Meeting this coming Thursday.    Best wishes,    Janet Irons    1 Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent:

1196p
Court UnsealedDec 12, 2018

Sentencing Memorandum

Sentencing Memorandum , USA v. WOLFE, No. 1:18-cr-00170-1 (D.D.C. Dec 11, 2018)

82p
Court UnsealedMar 17, 2016

Usg-Lavabit-Unsealed

U.S. District Court Eastern District of Virginia - (Alexandria) CRIMINAL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:13-sw-00522-CMH-1 Case title: USA v. In Re: Information Associated Date Filed: 07/16/2013 Date Terminated: 03/24/2015 with [Redacted] Assigned to: District Judge Claude M. Hilton Appeals court case number: 13-4625 Defendant (1) In Re: Information Associated with [Redacted] TERMINATED: 03/24/2015 Pending Counts Disposition None Highest Offense Level (Opening) None Terminated Counts Disposition None

560p
Dept. of JusticeAug 22, 2017

11 MAY 25-MAY 27 901_Redacted.pdf

Kristen M. Simkins From: Irons, Janet Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 11-29 AM To: Richard C. Smith Cc: Jeffrey T. We Subject: Meeting with Prison Society tomorrow Hello Warden Smith, I'm writing in preparation for our meeting with you and Director Hite tomorrow at 9:30 to talk about the Law Library. We have been in touch with Kim Kelmor, Assistant Director ofthe Law Library at Penn State, who has experience with prison libraries. She has helpfully provided us with some questions and guida

186p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.