Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta01784316DOJ Data Set 10Correspondence

EFTA Document EFTA01784316

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-efta01784316
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: David Sauvage mounomplimenew Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 4:49 PM To: Jeffrey E. Subject: Re: That's cool. Question for you: when=l read your lady-friend in the room, did you feel I was tapping into somet=ing real? Or did you feel I was just saying random stuff that would apply =o anyone, like the astrologer? David <=iv class="gmail_extra"> On Tue, Aug 16, 20=6 at 12:44 PM, jeffrey E. <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> wrote= i told them that the a=troler in the room could tell them their diagnosis. they=all received the exact same piece of paper , however they all rated =he astrologer as between good an perfect O= Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 10:39 AM, David Sauvage wrote: I'm confused. You did an experiment with 200 girls where you held the=r hands and rating them? Or that's what you're suggesting for me?<=div> On Tue, Aug =6, 2016 at 12:30 PM, jeffrey E. <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >=wrote: you dont have to=be a scientist to underatnd the concept of proof. =C240 does massage work? not a science question , but some thi=k it does. can you prove to anyone that your intuitive a=ilities are repeatable. verifiable, . probab=y not. but is ok. with vast experience , chinese d=ctors can tell if someones kidneys are working properly , the =yes are a little dull and yellow, its not science but a pretty=good predictor. . the other experiment you can try if yo= want is hold their hands. write down what you feel. 1>=A0 , and afterwards have them choose which best describes thei= charcateristics. I did this with 200 girls. =C24, each one had to rate the accuracy of diagnosisi on a scale of 1-10.=C21, the results ranged from 3-10. 40=A0 however, the written diagnosis was exactly the =ame for each, no one like the results . beliveing is mo=e fun On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 9:57 AM, David Sauvage = a wrote: I don't mind anything you're saying - I am defini=ely not a scientist, don't claim to be, and don't know much about =xperiments and design. EFTA_R1_00105544 EFTA01784316 I feel like it'd=be good to talk it out? I say what I can do, and somebody who knows scienc= tells me how we can test that, until we arrive at a solution that works b=th ways? Sent from my mobile device On Aug 16, =016, at 11:44 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]» wrote: I like you, I am trying to b= kind, that is not science. . if you make people feel be=ter and no one is injured , all the best to you. =C24e how about being blindfolded and guessing their name. the outco=e must be verifiable, not you are shy , sometimes. =angry other times . the trick of mentalists that do much bette= than that. they could take a strength finder test, and =hen you could take it with empathy for them, there are 100 que=tions see if you got the more than 80 percent right. Q=A0 On =ue, Aug 16, 2016 at 9:24 AM, David Sauvage > wrote: Jeffrey, Just an additional thought. A visio=, actually-- What if I did readings blindfolded? So I held s=meone's hand and felt into them. With such limited visual/tactile info=mation, it would be a real test of my empathic abilities. It would almost =alidate "the sixth sense." Then maybe w= could compare my ability to read people with an average person's abil=ty to read people? Just brainstorming here.=. Very best, David On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 9:=8 AM, David Sauvage wrote:<=r> I would love to do=that. Definitely has higher probability of success. Sen= from my mobile device On Aug 15, 2016, at =52 AM, jeffrey E. [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]» wrote: I greatly appreciatei the honesty, Q=A0 I dont think will work with pictures. but might work face t= face. if it will work at all. if so I would try 10 wom=n, and ten names. . you willl need to touch each one.Q=A0 2 EFTA_R1_00105545 EFTA01784317 On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 10:32 PM, David Sauvage wrote: Hi Jeffrey and Gino, Earlier today, I sat =own with 15 pictures and 15 names and tried to match them. It turned out t= be quite a struggle -- primarily because people were very similar. For in=tance, I'd have descriptions like this: Shy b=t relatively happy on the outside Filled with frustration and an=iety Burning with rage deep down But ou= of the 15 people, that could vaguely describe 3 or 4 them. So my matching=ending up looking like a convoluted chart. =hat I concluded was that I need a bit more help designing this experiment.=Ideally, rather than matching 15 names to pictures, I have a bunch of bina=y decisions (A or B). One would expect me to get 50% right. IF the people =re emotionally different enough (happy v. sad, for instance) I hypothesize=l will do considerably better than chance. Does that make sense? Gino as well. ha=pening on that end. I have started to go down this road with my friend at NYU. =appy to discuss with And of c=urse, happy to submit to MRI machines and the like to figure what's Open to any and all thoughts.=Science, clearly, is not my gift. Very best, David On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 1:49 PM, David Sauvage «= wrote: Hi Jeffrey= Sorry it took a =eat to respond. This weekend, when I have space and time, 11=1 ask a friend to lay out some pictures and names and see how I do. And 184=39;11 report back what I learn. I've been thinking about thi= for a while -- and I do feel we ultimately need a more rigorous experimen=. But I like your idea, at least to start, of just giving it a good and se=ing. Great meeting you. David 3 EFTA_R1_00105546 EFTA01784318 Sent from my mobile device On Aug 7, 2016, at =:22 AM, Jeffrey E. <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]» wrote: david, if you can do the name t= photo test. in a 25 picture test. it could =e an interesting begining, I suggst you take twenty wo=en all availbel on google or facebook and try. 4=M), plea=e note The information contained in this communication is confi=ential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside inform=tion, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the prop=rty of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this commun=cation or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. =f you have received this communication in error, please notify us immed=ately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:jeevacation@gm=il.com> , and destroy this c=mmunication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyrigh= -all rights reserved 40=A0 please note The information contained in this communication is<=r>confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute insid= information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is =he property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of thiscommunication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be un=awful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify =s immediately by 4 EFTA_R1_00105547 EFTA01784319 return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and destro= this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. =opyright -all rights reserved 4)=A0 please note The information contained in this communication is<=r>confidential, may be attorney- client privileged, may constitute insid= information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is =he property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of thiscommunication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be un=awful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify =s immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <[email protected]> , and destro= this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. =opyright -all rights reserved 4>=A0 please note The information contained i= this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged,=may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use =f the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclos=re or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly pro=ibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication =n error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to =a href="mailto:[email protected]" target="_blank">jeevacation@gmai=.com, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, inc=uding all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 5 EFTA_R1_00105548 EFTA01784320 4>=A0 please note The information contained in this communication is<=r>confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute insid= information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is =he property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of thiscommunication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be un=awful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify =s immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and destro= this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. =opyright -all rights reserved 6 EFTA_R1_00105549 EFTA01784321

Technical Artifacts (5)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.