Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta01785415DOJ Data Set 10Correspondence

EFTA Document EFTA01785415

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-efta01785415
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading PDF viewer...

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Deepak Chopra Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 1:56 PM To: jeffrey E. Subject: Re: Entanglement Made Simple Jeff--poetry is a raid on the inarticulate We have yearnings that are secret deep and hidden from ourselves Even in the objective reality of physicists 99.9 % of reality is sub emp=rical and therefore unknowable Its useful of course-we are in communication right now because of it !</=> My inner joy however does not depend on it Every story is a system of thought -including science stories Reality just is --sometimes it sucks at other times--ecstasy !! I'm driving soon to LA so may be off computer 2013 Costa Del Mar Road Carlsbad, CA 92009 The C=opra Foundation <http://www.choprafoundation.org/> chttp://www.choprafoundation.=rg/> <http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/l/SlryZ4SaSrL_S=500_SS115_.jpg> chttp://www.amazon.com/Super-Genes-Astonishing-Optimum-Well-Being=dp/0804140138/deepakchcom07-20> <http://www.amazon.com/Super-Genes-Astonishing-Optimum-Well-Being=dp/0804140138/deepakchcom07-20> Super Genes: Unlock the Astonishing Power of Your DNA for Optimum Health and Wel=being <http://www.am=zon.com/Super-Genes-Astonishing-Optimum-Well-Being/dp/0804140138/deepakchc=m07-20> EFTA_R1_00107512 EFTA01785415 <=span> From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 9:44:43 AM To: Deepak Chopra Subject: Re: Entanglement Made Simple poetry allows one to paint their own meaning on similar words. I would like you consideer the following. during the indu=trial revolution, descriptions of man became mechanical. =nbsp; , everyone looling for new mechanisms. ie machine =ovements. machines need power to run In their natural state they are=OFF. default position OFF people have default ON. each piece tryin= to stay on. freud described falling asleep. and dreams turning o=. I believe that incorrect. I believe that dreams = the inner workings are ALWAYS on. consiouness gets turn ON&nb=p; when awake and OFF when asleep. . it takes energy to =eep up the consiousness screen ON sleep provides the time re charge. .&nb=p; the voices the schizo hears are his own, but his conscious „does=t make the distinction between inside and outside. and is certain ot=ers are speaking to him/ the all have sleep disorders. . and k=eping a person awake forcefully in prison leads to them repeatedly hearing=voices. ( their own inner ?) . I believe tha= drugs that turn off your consiousness during the day, allow more direct a=cess to inner workings but not useful as they probably cannot be modified. ie you and I eating french fries :) if you consider consiounes a user interface, between inner working and=self. . language becomes the way that inners speaks to self.&n=sp; chomsky now agrees with me. self aware is tricky, is the computer screen aware of the processor or=process behind it? the camera on our skype is it aware " =f the image? light adjusting screens seems aware o= the level of ambient light. . I ve been doing some remarkable experiments. . fr On Mon Au 15 2016 at 7:23 AM Deepak Chopra <=pan dir="ltr"> <mailto: > wrote: Time present and time past Are both perhaps present in time future And time future contained in time past. If all time is eternally present All time is unredeemable. What might have been is an abstraction Remaining a perpetual possibility Only in a world of speculation. What might have been and what has been 2 EFTA_R1_00107513 EFTA01785416 Point to one end, which is always present.=/span> Footfalls echo in the memory Down the passage which we did not take Towards the door we never opened Into the rose-garden. My words echo=br> Thus, in your mind. =nbsp; &n=sp; &nb=p;But to what purpose Disturbing the dust on a bowl of rose-leav=s I do not know. =nbsp; &n=sp; &nb=p;Other echoes Inhabit the garden. Shall we follow? 2013 Costa Del Mar Road Carlsbad, CA 92009 The Chopra Foundation <http://www.choprafoundation.org/> <=div> =img src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/l/SlryZ4SaSa._51500_SS115_=jpg"> =br> <http://www.amazon.com/Super-Genes-Astonishing-Optimum-Well-Being=dp/0804140138/deepakchcom07- 20> =a href="http://www.amazon.com/Super-Genes-Astonishing-Optimum-Well- Being=dp/0804140138/deepakchcom07.20" target="_blank">From: Robert Addinall «http://ww=.amazon.com/Super- Genes-Astonishin -O timum-Well-Being/dp/0804140138/deepa=chcom07.20> <mailto: Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 9:14:52 AM To: 'Brian Josephson' Cc: Deepak Chopra; 'JACK SARFATTI'; 'Stanley A. KLEIN'; 'Ruth Kastne='; 'nick herbert'; ; 'George Knapp'; Subject: RE: ement a Simp e Interesting way of putting it Brian. It seems, a bit, to incorpo=ate your ideas about signs being important. It would also seem that =t could overlap with Ruth's theory - Ruth also seems to be saying that at =ny decision point there are a number of possible futures out there and you can choose which one to go to through a process.=br> I tend towards the block universe view myself but there's a lot of good dis=ussion to be had here. Original Message From: Brian Josephson I <mailton Sent: August-15-16 4:33 AM To: Robert Addinall 3 EFTA_R1_00107514 EFTA01785417 Cc: Deepak Chopra; JACK SARFATTI; Stanley A. KLEIN; Ruth Kastner; nick herb=rt; <mailto ; George Knapp; ; Anthony Gantner; David Kaiser; Saul-Paul Sirag; fred=alan Subject: Re: Entanglement Made Simple > On 15 Aug 2016, at 03:25, Robert Addinall wrote: > Deepak's statement is very broad, however, being in an outside of ti=e transcendental state where the universe appears to be spontaneous simult=neous emergence of space time events would not contradict the block univer=e model. You would see past, present and future coming into being together and there would be no problem with c=usality running both ways. The future is not here now: what is here now is the process that will lead =o the future. Think of it being like a bus with a destination on it:=that sign indicates where it will be, but currently it is somewhere else.&=bsp; And by getting on a particular bus we can determine our own future, but we are not there at the moment. Brian Brian D. Josephson Emeritus Professor of Physics, University of Cambridge Director, Mind—Mat=er Unification Project Cavendish laboratory, JJ Thomson Ave, Cambridge CB3=0HE, UK WWW: htt =//www.tcm. h .cam.ac.ukhbdj10 chttp://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uktbdj10> please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 4 EFTA_R1_00107515 EFTA01785418

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.