Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta01787039DOJ Data Set 10Correspondence

EFTA Document EFTA01787039

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-efta01787039
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Richard Kahn Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 7:29 PM To: Jeffrey E. Subject: Art my take after reading two articles below on =hether or not Leon should pay and handle shipping two pieces to PBI and =aris is that we are safer having Leon do rather than Haze =rust please advise thank =ou http://www.herrick.com/jason-kleinman/publications/new-york%E2%=0%99s-sales-and-use-tax-%E2%80%93-lessons- for-art-collectors/ May 2016 New York Sales and Use Tax and Works of Art Sales tax on the purchase of artwork =dds up to a significant amount in the high-end art world. Art dealers =nd collectors should be aware of two recent New York sales tax developments when it =omes to selling or purchasing works of art. Resale certificates The New York State Attorney General =nnounced a $7 million settlement of a sales and use tax claim against a =eal estate developer for misuse of resale certificates that he used in order to =urchase artwork free from sales tax but later displayed the artworks in his residence or business premises. The Attorney General =lso announced a settlement with an employee of an art gallery who had registered a separate business as a vendor and =sed the resale certificate to purchase art she later used. A valid resale certificate enables a =etailer to purchase goods free of sales and use tax based on the fact =hat the retailer will then sell the goods to an ultimate consumer and that sale will be =ubject to tax. A vendor does not have to collect sales tax when the resale certificate is presented within 90 days of the =urchase and is offered in good faith. Acceptance in good faith generally means that the vendor has no knowledge that the =ertificate being offered is false or fraudulently presented. 20 NYCRR5532.4(b)(2)(i). For example, if someone =urchasing beer, wine, or liquor presents a resale certificate in the name of a hardware business, =t would appear on its face that the certificate is being misused since =ne cannot sell those products legally without a proper license. EFTA_R1_00110145 EFTA01787039 However, even a business that has a =alid resale certificate will owe the use tax if the goods are =ubsequently taken out of inventory, held for sale to customers, and put to the =usinesses' own use. Consequently, a retail furniture store that =akes some desks out of its inventory and uses them to furnish its =ffices owes use tax on those desks. 20 NYCRR§531.3(a). In a case involving the publisher of =enthouse magazine, Bob Guccione, artworks purchased by a registered =endor were held to be subject to sales tax since they were not purchased =E2 for one and only one purpose: resale" and were =isplayed at the residence and offices of Mr. Guccione. (P-H Fine Arts, Ltd. v. NYS Tax Appeals Tribunal, October 13, 1994 aff'd. 227 AD2d 683, 3rd =/span>Dept., 1996). The New York Department of Taxation and Finance =as opined that lending art for display at a 1 2 museum in New York is 'use' that =ould trigger the tax if the owner was a resident for sales and use tax =urposes when purchased. TSB-A-08(7)S. Delivery On Aug. 6, 2015, the New York State =epartment of Taxation and Finance issued TB-ST-155, =ntitled "Delivery Rules for New York State Sales Tax." This tax bulletin =iscusses the rules governing where delivery of property or services =ccurs and the resulting tax consequences. The bulletin also =e-emphasizes that a use tax is due if tangible personal property is purchased by an individual who maintains a place of abode in New York =without regard to how many days it is used) or by anyone engaged in business in New York who brings the goods into the =tate. The bulletin restates the rule that =he amount of sales tax due is determined based on the location where =elivery of tangible personal property is made—nothing new there. In an ordinary transaction where a =urchaser takes the goods with them upon the sale, the location of the sale determines the amount =f state and local sales tax due. If goods are purchased and then delivered by the seller's own =rucks, the location where delivery is made determines the tax due. =lso, if the seller ships the goods by common carrier (such as the =.S. Postal Service, FedEx, UPS, etc.) or the seller arranges shipment by a private or contract carrier, the location where the goods =re delivered determines the tax due. However, the bulletin makes clear =hat if the purchaser makes arrangements for =he goods to be picked up by a common carrier or private contract carrier, or if the =oods are delivered to an employee, agent, or representative of the =urchaser, sales tax is due based upon that location. This is a particular problem =or those whose purchases are very valuable and require special handling which, for many reasons not related to tax, a =urchaser may want to control. For example, if you are buying a =aluable, fragile piece of art, like a sculpture or large painting, =hich needs to be packed with extraordinary care and shipped through a service that specializes =n handling that type of art the purchaser might want to make those arrangements himself even if the location of ultimate =elivery is outside New York. In that case, New York sales tax would be due if you take delivery or send your agent to =ake the goods from New York to its ultimate destination in another state or foreign country. The tax consequence is =aced, in part, on the narrow definitions of delivery. This has caused uproar throughout the =alleries and art sellers in New York. Within weeks, TB-ST-155 =isappeared from the Department's website, except for one reference on =age 32 of Publication 750 (A Guide to Sales Tax in New York), 2 EFTA_R1_00110146 EFTA01787040 =ith a link to the bulletin that ultimately takes you to a note =E2 webpage not found.' The Department is reviewing the =ulletin and will reissue it after the review. The good news is that the Department =eard the uproar and is reconsidering its position; the bad news is that =ithout guidance otherwise, gallery owners, art dealers, and purchasers may have =o pay and collect sales tax in New York and file protective refund claims until the issue is resolved. Sales and use tax issues can be =ifficult and expensive to deal with since the tax is calculated on =ross receipts from sales without regard to profits. If the tax is not collected from =he purchaser it becomes the seller's liability and, if not =aid, can be collected from officers, employees, or directors who are =E2 responsible persons' and are personally liable for the delinquency. GT has an experienced team handling state and =ocal sales and use tax issues around the country including nexus questions, exempt and non-exempt goods and services, exempt =rganizations, and voluntary disclosure agreements. This GT Alert was prepared by Glenn Newman. Questions about =his information can be directed to: > =nbsp;Glenn Newman > =nbsp;Or =our Greenberg Traurig attorney Richard Kahn HBRK Associates Inc. 575 Lexington =venue 4th Floor New York, NY 10022 tel= fa cel 3 EFTA_R1_00110147 EFTA01787041

Technical Artifacts (2)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

URLhttp://www.herrick.com/jason-kleinman/publications/new-york%E2%=0%99s-sales-and-use-tax-%E2%80%93-lessons
Wire Refreference

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.