Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta01797194DOJ Data Set 10Correspondence

EFTA Document EFTA01797194

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-efta01797194
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Christian Duvernoi Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 11:50 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Re: ltr.1=1.7;s not exactly a service stair but rather an alternative one to leave you=a personal staircase to the bike parking. Both stairs will be treated=with the same aesthetic attention, and therefore will be no more obtrusive =o the view than the stairs to the bike parking. The symmetry of the d=uble staircase will in fact make it look less like a "service" =tair and more like an appropriate architectural feature. Furthermore,=by turning the last set of stairs parallel to the road, it allows the pedes=rian realm (stairs and sidewalk) and the vehicular realm (road) to be separ=ted with a wall, which will provide a softer transition from walkway to roa=. If you would prefer to remove the double staircase, and instead jus= have one stair to the bike parking, then that is perfectly viable. Finally= with an appropriate planting scheme (low- growing, wind tolerant plants) th= visibility of the final sequence of stairs from the kitchen window will be=negligible. christian you made a service stair„ directly in line =ith the kitchen view. why? it makes no sense. 1 EFTA_R1_00133603 EFTA01797194

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.