Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta01802686DOJ Data Set 10Correspondence

EFTA Document EFTA01802686

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-efta01802686
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Joscha Bach < Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 6:45 AM To: Jeffrey Epstein Cc: Nowak, Martin Subject: Re: Attachments: signature.asc This is fascinating. Could we get a quantitative measure on the cost of =ndividual brains, with respect to resource consumption and quality =ontrol? The former would be mostly brain size, i.e. how hard it is to =eed it, but also how long it takes to develop and train it. The latter =ould apply to individual differences in intelligence etc. with roughly =he same brain size. Insect societies should be special, because the absence of individual =hances for reproduction removes evolutionary competition between them. =ndividual intelligence benefits the other members, too. In social =pecies where every individual has a chance of reproduction, individual =ntelligence in addition gives an edge over competitors in the same =opulation. Why would mob rule encourage lower intelligence in =ndividuals? We still have competition among the mobsters, so there is =lways an evolutionary pressure towards higher intelligence. Intelligence is a tool for many uses, it may be used for abstract =roblem solving or for power. The latter might imply that being too =ntelligent is dangerous. If an individual is powerful, it might benefit =rom getting rid of competition, especially smarter but currently less =owerful potential rivals. In a species with social dominance =ierarchies, it might be a survival advantage for the vast majority to =e either less smart than the ones in power, or to be smart and totally =isinterested in power. It is tempting to ponder if that could explain =erds, i.e. people with high intelligence but low social skills and =ittle interest in dominance. > Am 18.06.2015 um 06:23 schrieb jeffrey E. <[email protected]>: > http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/06/150616215956.htm =eems that as populations grow, indiv intelligence might go down , =s mob rule becomes the norm. Gas a speed measure . might also =ssume that it takes 2 men with iq of something less than 100 to =ccomplish the same task in the same time as an iindiv with an q of lets =ay 100. > -- > please note > The information contained in this communication is confidential, may > be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and > is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of > JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or > any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you > have received this communication in error, please notify us > immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], > and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all > attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA_R1_00145145 EFTA01802686

Technical Artifacts (3)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone16215956
URLhttp://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/06/150616215956.htm

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.