Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta01804643DOJ Data Set 10Correspondence

EFTA Document EFTA01804643

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-efta01804643
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Richard Kahn Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2016 8:58 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Fwd: Great St James Sent from my iPhone =br>Begin forwarded message: =rom: Hugo Hodge Date: May 1, 2016 at 4:33:39 PM EDT To: <=b> Richard Kahn Subject: Re: Great St James No Sir, $Sk o=f each option. That means $80k • $Sk for a total of $75k for the all inclus=ve scope and $72k • $Sk for a total of $67k for the reduced scope. On Sun, May 1, 2016 a= 3:52 PM, Richard Kahn rote:=br> if I understand corre=tly you will do the entire program minus the complete as builts and install=tion witness for 72k less 10k = a total of 62k Date: Sunday, May 1, 2016 at 3:09 PM To: Richard Kahn ><=r>Subject: Re: Great St James <=span> Good afternoon Mr. Kahn, While I must r=iterate that u strongly suggest the option for the entire proposal) can ta=e $5k off each option. On May 1, 2016, at 1:55 PM, Rich=rd Kahn wrote: =div> my client is v=ry island centric. no insult meant at all, and i apologiz= if you felt slighted. can you give me your best and final price so t=at i may once again review all alternatives and then prepare one final appl=s to apples analysis. Thank you. Rich EFTA_R1_00150286 EFTA01804643 Sent from my iPhone On Apr 30, 2016, at 8:=8 PM, Hugo Hodge wrote: With the greatest respect for you and your client,=l'm sorry but HKT will have to respectfully decline to accommodate that off=r. Apparently you have someone off island, u=aware of the local requirements and hopefully the cost you are expecting to=pay will not increase when they acquire that knowledge. SS0k is more than 50% below the proposal and, for lack of better words= quite unacceptable and insulting. Should you run i=to difficulties with your other option HKT stands prepared to deliver first=class results as described in our written and verbal communication. On Apr 30, 2016, at 4:04 PM, Richard Kahn wrote:=br> Thank you for your email. as i told you when we s=oke last week I have a bid for 40k. my instructions are to source loc=lly if i can and save travel costs. I will increase my o=fer to you and for 50k we can proceed with your proposal. amy dempse= is being retained for routing. Thank=you. Richard Kahn HBRK Associates Inc. Tel Fax Cell wrote: Good morning Mr.Kahn= I have thoroughly reviewed your suggestions for m=difications to the bid and given your request great consideration. I honest=y believe that the items you requested are important for a successful proje=t. For example, the witnessing of the factory acceptance is not a step I wo=Id recommend omitting. With that said, the items y=u suggested to remove total $23,000. To ensure the integrity of this projec= I am willing to do the project with the entire scope at the original price=less $23,000 for a total of $80,000. If you decline this option and are con=inced that these items should be omitted, I am willing to reduce the remain=ng items by 10% resulting in a cost of $72,000 for the revised scope. 2 EFTA_R1_001 50287 EFTA01804644 I strongly recommend you consider the first option but l=am willing to discuss this further with you if necessary. Best Regards, Hugo Hodge Jr On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 a= 12:32 PM, Richard Kahn wrote= it wa= a pleasure speaking with you earlier. as discussed the following are=s are scopes that will not be needed and my comments: a) conceptual design on cable routes - ok to keep - please revisit pri=ing b) detailed cable specs and preparation of bid docs -&nbs=;ok to keep - please revisit pricing c) detailed switch an= meter design and prep of all switches and metering device - ok to k=ep - please revisit pricing d) review all switch and cable bi= submittals and submit to Wapa for approval - ok to keep - please r=visit pricing e) witness factory acceptance test - not nec=ssary as all we need is for you to review test from manufacturer and should=be included in d) above f) complete final design to include c=vil and electrical drawings - ok to keep - please revisit pricing</=> back from you this afternoon g) witness installation and test electrical devices - not ne=ded h) complete as builts - not needed i appreciate your effort in revisiting your pricing and=look forward to hearing thank you Richard Kahn HBRK Associates Inc. tel fax cel 3 EFTA_R1_001 50288 EFTA01804645

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.