EFTA Document EFTA01821670

To: From: Sent Subject Jeffrey Epstein Sun 1218/2009 10:35:40 AM Re: "Not at all. Again, I am only saying it makes the situation surprisingly nice when you make things clear to these girls. The fact you think i do little and some of the requests you make are strange and unreasonable to me, not to you." Nadia , I have always made it clear.... however no matter what i say or do , people still see you and what you do or don't do. and form their opinions from their own lying eyes. Im not sure why you don't understand that. On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 2:22 AM, N E M • .1==.> wrote: Not at all. Again, I am only saying it makes the situation surprisingly nice when you make things clear to these girls. The fact you think i do little and some of the requests you make are strange and unreasonable to me, not to you. And what i was trying to tell you was that instead of trying to explain why I disagree and fighting about it, you showed me yesterday that I can just do the things you need because they are obviously important to you, even though I may not understand why. The feeling of having your needs met without a struggle is too nice and i certainly don't want to be the one to deprive you of it. I am being nice here but you choose to ignore the fact I am agreeing with you and keep attacking me, i am tired and i ant going to bed. From: Jeffrey E stein < v i n i To: N E M Sent: Sun, December 6, 2009 12:47:04 AM Subject Re: read what you have written, you honestly belive that you should have the ultimate decision on who i hire, who i give an apt to, who i let stay in my house. these are not your " needs" . its my restrictions. your previous shrinks asked what role you were going to perform as opposed to give excuses why you could ,would or should not.. it is still the same.. The fact that you do little is not strange or unreasonble to me., it is merely fact. On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 8:27 PM, NEM wrote: Yes, you have been right all along and so have I. And we can take each others needs seriously or dismiss them because they seem strange or unreasonable to us. I don't ask to make other people feel worse, just to be honest about your intentions and not lead them on and undermine our relationship by doing so. From: Jeffre E stein < eeva I n i om> To: N E M Sent: Sat, December 5, 2009 8:15:12 PM Subject: Re: you mean to ask you to actually look at your behavior is not constructive. re how you feel I just thought that you would endeavor to feel better. , why else would you ask for such things.. so you could feel worse.. maybe. ----those are the only two choices. as i said the other day, PROT5 PROT0 have you asked yourself.. MAYBE just maybe, has he been right all along, .. try and see how the pieces fit, On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 7:44 PM, N E M wrote: not constructive! you are beating a dead horse. And don't tell tne how i feel, its not true. From: Jeffriraluiliensijan i n i To: N E M Sent: Sat, December 5, 2009 7:30:48 PM Subject: Re: Other people did more with no fighting whatsoever, none, . that is the ugly truth. not only have i been consistant about your doing little and receiving much, but you feel better , by making other people feel worse. On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 7:24 PM, N E M <: :> wrote: I was always by your side and I did plenty: however not without fighting you, not without telling you what you ask for is petty and unimportant in the scheme of things, and not without treating your requests as simply an unnecessary way to keep me occupied. And for that I ant really sorry. Unfortunately, it was your kind gesture that made me see the difference and not your yelling and nagging so you can throw a tantrum now but it seems obvious that leading by example or just being kind is a more constructive way to communicate than attacking each other... From: _le To: N E M Sent: Sat, December 5, 2009 6:46:11 PM Subject: Re: "you hired dana after I WANTED HER TO LEAVE.. " you took naps after WE TALKED ABOUT WHAT I WANTED< - jenna lives at 66 after I ARGUED FOR A YEAR about what I WANTED YOU TO DO.. and in return I did On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation®gmail.com> wrote: yes, I read them and its all about what i do , it took a year of arguing before you gave in, you mean i didnt give in as quickly. and you take that to be a bad thing, it is your belief that I should succumb to petty ,behavior based on nothing more than childish jealousies. while all the time ignoring the fact that you do not do much but complain. On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 5:11 PM, N E M sc > wrote: Sorry but you didn't do any of those things the way you did this one"it took a year of arguing to explain to you every one of those issues and it is still a compromise, jenna after 2 years still lives at 301, still comes to florida, you hired dana after I wanted her to leave, moved her to 301 and she still visits as well, you took hundreds of naps with sarah after we already talked about it and watched movies in the office every night hugging and being affectionate to these people...all of that knowing it was painful for me and PROT6 PROT1 i needed something from you that you didn't find justifiable or important enough. I know you were not trying to hurt me and I had to deal with the fact you are just going to do what you want. I obviously can't force you to do anything. With this email you actually took my needs into consideration without fighting me (well, until now) , I appreciated it, I realized how much nicer it is and I should do that for you too. ( this would be the point where i am dealing with my own actions and i am not content with them ) I don't see why we are arguing now...are you actually reading my mails? From: le E a ffir ciriliesmaliscn n To: nadia Sent: Sat, December 5, 2009 4:18:08 PM Subject: All I needed to sec was you actually taking a step to do what was important to me .. no naps no movie watching, no dana , no jenn, these are all the same , just this one thing. , jeffrey doing something he detests just to demonstrate to nadia that he is willing to give up what he believes in. no matter how little he recieves in return.. It is just one more thing. no more no less. you seem content not to deal with your actions. only mine. it is not helpful constructive or fair. The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by c-mail to jeevacation@ gmail.com, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. communication or any pan thereof is strictly prohibited PROT7 PROT2 return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and return e-mail or by e-mail to kin [email protected], and PROT8 PROT3 return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and PROT9 PROT4