Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta01829866DOJ Data Set 10Correspondence

EFTA Document EFTA01829866

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-efta01829866
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
To: William Murphy From: Jeffrey Epstein Sent Wed 7/15/2009 3:19:06 PM Subject: Re: how about a local avaya rep On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 11:06 AM, William Murphy wrote: ETC provided a proposal for a replacement Panasonic phone system. I have not negotiated this down any but just looking online for the model number of the equipment listed puts them about 8-10K more than what you can purchase it direct for. The total is $29453.97. They proposed 40 phones. This is based on the original number that was given to them by David. I believe that there are some on hand to serve as replacements. I'm not sure how many arc currently used so I have asked for a copy of the original invoice for the work that was done with the existing system. They quoted $350 per handset if we were to upgrade from the installed I6-button phones to the 32- button phones. Steve mentioned that Sarah had called Bill Marinet and that he would rather have issues with the current phone system addressed rather than purchasing the Panasonic system. Bill is pushing him to get over there to address your concerns as soon as possible. Please let me know if there is anything else I can do to get these issues resolved for you. WM From: Jeffrey Epstein Imailtoleevacationitsm tit cowl Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 4:47 PM To: William Murphy Subject: Re: hup: W. V, \ 1/2 neceliteipk coin nee elite_phones htin EFTA_R1_00205850 EFTA01829866 On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 4:18 PM, William Murphy la wrote: The costs to upgrade the existing 16-button phones to 32-button phones is $350 per handset. I should have the costs for a new Panasonic system tomorrow afternoon. I will forward those costs to you as soon as I receive them. WM From: Jeffrey Epstein [mailtojeevacationftmail.com] Sent: Tuesday. July 14.2009 7:46 AM To: William Murphy Subject: Re: somone mustknow how„ its an nec system On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 7:26 AM, William Murphy < > wrote: I have received a manual for the current one, but it does not go into great detail on configuring buttons. I'll see what I can get for a proposal today. Hope all is well. Wm Original Message From: Jeevacation <*ecvacation To: William Murphy Sent: Tue Jul 14 07:05:59 2009 ail.com> Have etc give us a proposal for new phone system. Have you revived a manual for the current one? Sent from my iPhone EFTA_R1_00205851 EFTA01829867

Technical Artifacts (2)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domainail.com
Domainmailtojeevacationftmail.com

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedSep 9, 2019

Epstein Depositions

10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps

839p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00028741

0p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01682184

186p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01579061

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00031532

0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA S 120 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x THE GOVERNMENT'S OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT'S PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney Southern District of New York Attorney for the United States of America Assistant United States Attorneys - Of Counsel - EFTA00039421 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 BACKGROUND 2 ARGUMENT 3 I. Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement Is Irrelevant to This Case 3 A. The NPA Does Not Bind the Southern District of New York 4 1. The Text of the Agreement Does Not Contain a Promise to Bind Other Districts 5 2. The Defendant Has Offered No Evidence That the NPA Binds Other Districts 9 B. The NPA Does Not Immunize Maxwell from Prosecution 15 1. The NPA Is Limited to Particular Crimes Between 2001 and 2007 15 2. The NPA Does Not Confer Enforceable Rights on Maxwell 17 C. The Defendant

239p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.