Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta01866977DOJ Data Set 10Correspondence

EFTA Document EFTA01866977

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-efta01866977
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading PDF viewer...

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
To: Jeffrey Epstein From: Paul Tweed Sent: Tue 5/3/2011 5:57:28 PM Subject: RE: Letter Tried to call you Jeffrey. Can you advise a good time or alternative number. Regards, Paul. Paul Tweed Senior Partner JOHNSONS Belfast I Dublin I London w: b: London Office: Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority Firm SRA ID: 544356 http://www.sra.org.uk/rules Paul Tweed is also a member of Paul Tweed LLP EFTA_R1_00270641 EFTA01866977 Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority SRA ID: 545975 Disclaimer: This e-mail transmission may be legally privileged but is, in any event, confidential and intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or disseminate the information in it, or take any action in reliance of it. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Johnsons Solicitors. If you have received this message in error, do not open any attachment, but please notify the individual sender (above) deleting this message from your system. Please rely on your own virus check. While reasonable efforts are made to ensure that e-mails are free from bugs or virus infection, no responsibility is taken by Johnsons Solicitors for any damage arising from any bug or virus infection From: Jeffrey Epstein Sent: 03 May 2011 13:14 To: Paul Tweed Subject: Re: Letter it needs a lot of work.. , im only available after 1 eastern On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 4:30 AM, Paul Tweed wrote: Jeffrey. I am re-attaching a copy of Mike's draft letter which I was referring to in my earlier email. I think this draft is fine, subject to the deletion of the penultimate paragraph (bracketed). We will obviously require clearance from D of Y before releasing the letter to the Telegraph and others. Would you be available to take a call from me later today in order to discuss further? Paul Paul Tweed Senior Partner JOHNSONS EFTA_R1_00270642 EFTA01866978 Belfast I Dublin I London w: London Office: t: f: Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority Firm SRA ID: 544356 http://www. sra.oro.uk/rules Paul Tweed is also a member of Paul Tweed LLP Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority SRA ID: 545975 Disclaimer. This e-mail transmission may be legally privileged but is, in any event, confidential and intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or disseminate the information in it, or take any action in reliance of it. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Johnsons Solicitors. If you have received this message in error, do not open any attachment, but please notify the individual sender (above) deleting this message from your system. Please rely on your own virus check. While reasonable efforts are made to ensure that e-mails are free from bugs or virus infection, no responsibility is taken by Johnsons Solicitors for any damage arising from any bug or virus infection EFTA_R1_00270643 EFTA01866979 **********i rdratio Hon The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, ple by return e-mail or by e-mail to . and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA_R1_00270644 EFTA01866980

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA02016959

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00014068

0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02414102

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that other improper relationships exist between Government agents and Epstein. Please provide any documents, correspondence, and other information regarding the possibility of any improper relationship, including: a) involvement in and/or awareness of any aspect of the Government's criminal investigation and/or possible prosecution/non-prosecution of Epstein; b) Attorney liklimenvolvement in and/or awareness of the Government's interest."( witness, subject, or target of the Epstein investigation, including Sarah Ghislaine Maxwell, Nadia Marcinkova, Lesley Groff, Haley Robson, Louella Ruboyo, Larry Morrison, Larry Visoki, David Rogers, William Hammond, and Robert Roxburgh; c) All documents, correspondence, and other information reflecting telephone calls (includin telephone logs and telephone billing statements) made by or received by m Jeffrey Epstein, the Florida Science

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02351991

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court upon Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 361); the United States's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 408); Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion to Compel Answers (DE 348) and Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Finding Waiver of Work Product and Similar Protections by Government and for Production of Documents (DE 414). The Motions are fully briefed and ripe for review. The Court has carefully considered the Motions and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. I. Background The facts, as culled from affidavits, exhibits, depositions, answers to interrogatories and reasonably inferred, for the purpose of these motions, are as follows: From betw

33p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.