Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta01895920DOJ Data Set 10Correspondence

EFTA Document EFTA01895920

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-efta01895920
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading PDF viewer...

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
To: jeffrey epstein (jeevacation©gmail.comXieffrey epstein (ieevacation6gmail.com)J; jeevacation©gmail.com(jeevacation©gmail.corni From: Boris Nikolic Sent Mon 4/15/2013 9:56:01 PM Subject FW: Jawbone follow-up Hi Boris, We re-ran the model assuming that the UP band adoption curve tracks more closely to the Blackberry adoption curve. While we think this rate of adoption is more reasonable than the company's projections, it may still be much too aggressive. Using the proposed common stock price we calculate a —2x MOI return over a ten year period. In our view it does not make sense to pursue an investment at this price. In addition, a secondary only transaction structure would make us uncomfortable since: a) we'd have no contractual relationship with (and no representations and warranties from) the company; and b) we wouldn't have a liquidation preference or any of the other rights enjoyed by the holders of preferred stock (e.g. information rights and rights to participate in future financings). Please let us know if you'd like to discuss further. We also considered how to message the reasons for passing on Jawbone. Here are the points that we think are most appropriate to share: In our view, the projected UP band unit sales are much too aggressive (absolutely, and in light of competing and expected new products); We are uncomfortable with the projected margin expansion (-15%), especially since we aren't aware of any specific drivers (value engineering is all that has been referenced) and the projected margin in 2018 is -13% higher than the industry median; and EFTA_R1_00320197 EFTA01895920 We are concerned about the likelihood of making a reasonable return on this investment since the proposed entry multiple is —5x revenue and the average trading multiple for public comps is less than lx revenue. Please let us know if you have comments or would like to take a different approach with the message. We think it probably makes sense for you to contact Hosain given your prior conversations and the relationships you have with others that are involved with the company. But we are happy to join you on a call or message directly if you'd prefer. Thanks, Rodi EFTA_R1_00320198 EFTA01895921

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA02016959

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00014068

0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02414102

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that other improper relationships exist between Government agents and Epstein. Please provide any documents, correspondence, and other information regarding the possibility of any improper relationship, including: a) involvement in and/or awareness of any aspect of the Government's criminal investigation and/or possible prosecution/non-prosecution of Epstein; b) Attorney liklimenvolvement in and/or awareness of the Government's interest."( witness, subject, or target of the Epstein investigation, including Sarah Ghislaine Maxwell, Nadia Marcinkova, Lesley Groff, Haley Robson, Louella Ruboyo, Larry Morrison, Larry Visoki, David Rogers, William Hammond, and Robert Roxburgh; c) All documents, correspondence, and other information reflecting telephone calls (includin telephone logs and telephone billing statements) made by or received by m Jeffrey Epstein, the Florida Science

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02351991

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court upon Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 361); the United States's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 408); Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion to Compel Answers (DE 348) and Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Finding Waiver of Work Product and Similar Protections by Government and for Production of Documents (DE 414). The Motions are fully briefed and ripe for review. The Court has carefully considered the Motions and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. I. Background The facts, as culled from affidavits, exhibits, depositions, answers to interrogatories and reasonably inferred, for the purpose of these motions, are as follows: From betw

33p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.