EFTA Document EFTA01902501

To: Cc: From: Sent Subject Re: Re hydraulic hose Richard Kahn ein eevacahon gmai .com Thur 2/14/2013 5:56:38 PM the answer to your question is no we have Parker fittings therefore require Parker hose, We have tried in the past to buy other hydraulic hose locally but the marriage between another manufactures brand and Parker did not last Even though you see many web sight advertising marrying different fittings to different hose, though experience we know it does not work Jack confirmed with me that this is the hose that we have always used in the past, for this size, rating and manufacture I have explained to jack your concern regarding pricing, he is going to contact his supplier to see if there is any more room for a discount, will advise I did check with a couple of companies in florida this morning, they provided verbal quotes but did not follow spec requirements. On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Richard Kahn wrote: just spent 2 hours searching hydraulic hoses as i thought jacks pricing was aggressive found 131 foot coil at 15.98 per foot vs jack 29.15 per foot = 1725 savings http://www.hydraulicsdirect.com/SAE R13 Hydraulic hose p/r13.htm also found at 18.78 per foot vs 29.15 per foot = 150 ft = 1555 savings http:/lhoses.cutandcouple.com/viewitems/hydraulic-hose/sae- 100r 13-hydraulic-hose jack is proving to be very expensive can you please verify that i have sourced proper hydraulic hoses (I" 5000psi sac 100R16) Richard Kahn HBRK Associates Inc. Begin forwarded message: From: Date: February EFTA_R1_00332758 EFTA01902501 To: Rich Kahn Cc: Subject: Re hydraulic hose Rich Attached for approval, this is for replacement of worn hydraulic lines on heavy machinery. any concerns let me know USVI Phone: New Mexico Phone: • USVI Phone New Mexic Phone: EFTA_R1_00332759 EFTA01902502