Case File
efta-efta01970186DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceEFTA Document EFTA01970186
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-efta01970186
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
To:
Jeffrey Epstein[[email protected]]
From:
Steven Sinofsky
Sent:
Sun 6/9/2013 5:41:20 PM
Subject: next
So what should I do about PR stuff once we sign. While one school of thought says they won't
do anything that is highly unlikely since they will get calls and have to say something. They will
officially no comment but then while on the phone set a tone for the story as best they can.
Two things occur to me:
• Steve is a guy that thinks he can use the press but gets confused. He is currently
driving a big reorg and doing most of that through the press first--many senior people
know less than they are telling the NY Times and Bloomberg (a good indication of talking
to the press is that these stories were almost the same)
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-06-03/microsoft-s-ballmer-said-to-plan-broad-
restructuring.html and http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/06/03/microsoft-weighs-
restructuring/
• Brad can be influenced to at least speak to PR and tell them how to handle. Right now
for example, this whole NSA PRISM thing makes me want to go be a whistleblower since
everyone is being less than forthright. It seems like Jay could talk to brad and politely /
indirectly remind him that we know MS went to the press and how they did back in
November. And that two can do this, I just didn't last time -- would be awful if folks
found out steve organizes to prevent succession planning, for example.
Steve has a lot going on. He is getting board approval for the reorg which is really all driven by
financial reporting stuff -- he really wants to obscure reporting (BING, Phone, XBOX) Or one
could be generous and say he wants to manage the business differently and thinks that people
follow the money when they build products (odd). Wants to buy a phone company too.
Are we sure people like Apple will read the agreement and not worry? Hard to work for
someone if there is a perception you can't say "things" about competitors...just jittery about
that. SORRY!
Sent from Windows Mail on Surface RT
http://blog.learningbyshipping.com ii
EFTA_R1_00452080
EFTA01970186
Technical Artifacts (4)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Email
[email protected]URL
http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/06/03/microsoft-weighsURL
http://blog.learningbyshipping.comURL
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-06-03/microsoft-s-ballmer-said-to-plan-broadRelated Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown
EFTA01951206
1p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01957994
0p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01908908
0p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01943353
0p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01910637
0p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01912337
0p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.