Case File
efta-efta01970689DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceEFTA Document EFTA01970689
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-efta01970689
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
To:
Steven Sinofsky
From:
Jeffrey Epstein
Sent:
Thur 6/6/2013 12:22:36 PM
Subject: Re: contract
http://blog.thekongfirm.com/2010/08/19/nondisparagement-clauses-whats-the-big-deal.aspx
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Steven Sinofsky
wrote:
But the way it reads it is for perpetuity and I can't really talk about Microsoft. I just can't
have that.
Reply message
From: "Jeffrey Epstein" <jeevacationpgmail.com>
To: "Steven Sinofsky"
Subject: contract
Date: Thu, Jun 6, 2013 3:48 AM
I think it is ok. lets talk, they will never sue you for disparagement.
it would make them look
ridcitulis , it is bad enough that they put in the non compete for 5 months.
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Steven Sinofsky
wrote:
Their comments will not be owned by them ... they will just be stories about me that they
placed (including the defense of this contract).
the biggest issue for me is section 6 -- it is a perpetuity agreement. I was on a 12 month
schedule for this whole thing. I can't figure out what can be said or not and for how long or
not.
Sent from Windows Mail
From: Jeffrey Epstein
Sent: Wednesday, June 5, 2013 1:43 PM
To: Steven Sinofsky
You can respond to their comments with abandon sobibdo not see a real issue
On Wednesday, June 5, 2013, Steven Sinofsky wrote:
Section 2... a lot of section 6 hinges on this section which is that payment should be made
unless the agreement is "materially" breached AND there is failure to cure. Defining what
materially breached means in the context of section 6 is tricky and curing a vague concept
of disparagement is tricky. There's an easy argument of "cannot unring the bell" that gets
made. What I worry about is basically not getting paid and then having to sue.
EFTA_R1_00452893
EFTA01970689
6b. This reads like a permanent restraining order on talking about Microsoft. Hard to see
how I could write a book or talk about Microsoft ever. This is not good. The end date for
everything was supposed to be 12 months. This vaguely extends it to jan 2016 but then
has a clause that seems to on forever.
6c. switches to first person weirdly "me"
14. this gives 21 days for me to sign. we should understand the SEC regulation. is this
business days? if the comp committee meets on the 12 then it is July before I have to sign
assuming perfect execution on their part.
Section 6 is very messy for me and PR.
It sets up a "gotcha" dynamic especially if I work at another company that matters or just
say anything in public. The press could write something I say as negative and then that
becomes evidence of material breach. Then they just don't pay. I have no recourse.
I know you think this will sit on a shelf but section 6 is currently the rest of my life.
Sent from Windows Mail on Surface RT
http://blog.learningbyshipping.com I @stevesi
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
EFTA_R1_00452894
EFTA01970690
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to ice\ [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
******* ****** **************************
********************
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any pan thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return c-mail or by c-mail to jeevacati n
mail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
EFTA_R1_004 52895
EFTA01970691
Technical Artifacts (5)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Domain
jeevacationpgmail.comEmail
[email protected]Email
[email protected]URL
http://blog.learningbyshipping.comURL
http://blog.thekongfirm.com/2010/08/19/nondisparagement-clauses-whats-the-big-deal.aspxRelated Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01957994
0p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025
Venture capital sexism anecdote forwarded to Jeffrey Epstein
The passage mentions a casual conversation about gender bias in venture funding and is forwarded to Jeffrey Epstein, but provides no concrete allegations, financial transactions, or links to high‑leve Steven Sinofsky forwarded a story about Day One Ventures founder Masha Drokova facing sexism. The email was sent to Jeffrey Epstein, suggesting possible peripheral connection. No specific dates, amou
1p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01943353
0p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown
EFTA01951206
1p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01912337
0p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01968710
0p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.