Case File
efta-efta01972749DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceEFTA Document EFTA01972749
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-efta01972749
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading PDF viewer...
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureText extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
To:
Fran: !
yn
l
iMei
Sent
Tue 5/28/2013 10:46:09 AM
Subject Re: Thanks
give me a piano music analogy, / watching the strings, ? after key inputs,? interesting byt not
dispositive of anything meaningful
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 6:40 AM, Ed Boyden -t
i> wrote:
I agree we need a top-down! Two thoughts:
-- Yes, developing mapping circuit technology and then applying it to
simple behaviors -- hard wired aversive stuff -- is indeed a way to
go. As we plan out these mapping technologies, we're actually
beginning experiments to map out these aversive things too. We are
collaborating with many groups along these lines. We need to finish
the fundamental technology building so that we can obtain maps at the
right level, and then we can acquire datascts that are compatible with
top-down theory, to be sure.
-- Another way to think top-down is to work our way inwards, from the
observables. We know that behavior -- movement, speech, other action
-- is observable; if a feeling or thought is prominent enough, it will
be manifest through these channels as an observable. Thus we can also
try to infer internal states by their effects on observables, and then
to associate neural activity with these internal states and
observables. In theory this should scale to arbitrarily complex
internal states, not just simple aversive states.
Best,
Ed
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Jeffrey Epstein <ieevacationagmail.com> wrote:
> i think you need a top down as well as bottom up. as looking at my piano
> while being played, i can go string by string ( not string theory
> strings). hammer by hammer, material of string , molecular interaction
> naturalvibration, harmonics, sympathtice vibration
but i would not hear
> or understand the melody or music being played.
I believe that each
> individual has its own encrpytion algorithm,
as the neural net grows
> it encrypts some input signals. some are hard wired. so instead of emotion
> , movement, speech, etc, I think a proitable area of initail inquiry should
> be the hard wired aversive stuff only. smell of dead meat. . reaction
> to fire. i tilt& that aesthectics will be the greatest ration of output to
> input. . or the least energy to decode. . dissonance, cannot be easily
> resolved so the energy to decode the information, is too high and bccomes
> painful.
Does a dream state come upon us, or do we dream all the time
> and concious state relegates the dreams to behind the screen. When sleep
> deprived the dreams begin to pop through the screen, as hallucinations.
EFTA_R1_00456487
EFTA01972749
> a breakdown of the screen , results in a form of schizphrenia, where they
> cann no longer distiguish between voices. dream produced while awake or the
> awake state angel on the shoulder whispering. . I am an avid finder of
> the bleeding edge in many fields. keep me up to date on what you are
> doing, and hope to see you in your own habitat.
> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Ed Boyden
wrote:
>> Hi Jeffrey,
>> Yes, it was great chatting about all the ways neuroengineering is
>> going to go in the coming years, revealing both fundamental
>> mechanistic brain maps, and providing the control knobs for fixing
>> brain disorders and understanding complex phenomena like
>> consciousness. Would be great to talk about how then to make
>> mathematical sense of these maps and control knobs... arguably the
>> big stumbling block to date is the lack of good data, but that's about
>> to change, thanks to our current and future efforts! Then we will
>> have many things that require deep mathematics to understand!
>> Ed
>> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 1:16 AM, Joi Ito
wrote:
>» Hi Jeffrey.
» >
>> > Thanks for a really enjoyable conversation and your hospitality tonight.
>> > Look forward to connecting again and receiving you at the Media Lab on my
>» turf ;-)
»>
>» - Joi
» >
» --
>> Ed Boyden, Ph. D.
>> Leader, Synthetic Neurobiology Group
>> Associate Professor, MIT Media Lab and McGovern Institute,
>> Departments of Biological Engineering and Brain and Cognitive Sciences
>> Benesse Chair, New York Stem Cell Foundation-Robertson Investigator,
>> and Paul Allen Distinguished Investigator
>> MIT, Room E15-421.20 Ames St., Cambridge, MA 02139
>> office
>> cell -
>> email
»fax -I
EFTA_R1_00450488
EFTA01972750
» skype --
>> web - htt lislaitheticnetirobi loev ore
>> twitter
>
> **************
***** ****************************************
> The information contained in this communication is
> confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
> constitute inside information, and is intended only for
> the use of the addressee. It is the property of
> Jeffrey Epstein
> Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
> communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
> and may be unlawful. If you have received this
> communication in error, please notify us immediately by
> return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
> destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
> including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
Ed Boyden, Ph. D.
Leader, Synthetic Neurobiology Group
Associate Professor, MIT Media Lab and McGovern Institute,
Departments of Biological Engineering and Brain and Cognitive Sciences
Benesse Chair, New York Stem Cell Foundation-Robertson Investigator,
and Paul Allen Distinguished Investigator
MIT, Rnnm
0 Ames St., Cambridge, MA 02139
office
cell -
email
fax
skype -
web - ht ://s ntheticnc rr
i I
. r
twitter -
***********************************************************
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
EFTA_R1_00456489
EFTA01972751
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
EFTA_R1_00458490
EFTA01972752
Related Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown
EFTA01972890
4p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01976450
0p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01973003
0p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01972890
0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown
EFTA02569987
5p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01972711
0p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.