Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta01990860DOJ Data Set 10Correspondence

EFTA Document EFTA01990860

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-efta01990860
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
To: jeevacationegmaitcomfjeevacation©gmail.com ; jeevacation©gmail.conteevacationGgmail.com]; Fran: The Duke Sent Fri 3/4/2011 5:37:50 PM Subject: Fw: RESPONSE draft 2 This is what is suggested. Make any changes that suit you both that make it relevant to your particular case. There are two competing issues to deal with. 1. Is to clearly state that this is fabrication. And 2 to distance me from any of this if you can. As is said at the bottom we are now getting questions from the MoS as well. From: Amanda Thirsk To: The Duke Sent: Fri Mar 04 17:32:39 2011 Subject: RESPONSE draft 2 Sir I would go with something along the following lines ... The allegations that are made by in paragraph 6 in relation to The Duke of York are completely untrue and without foundation. The only time I recall them meeting was at my home in 2001 in London — you have published a photo. They did not have sex. They may have met again in New York but I categorically state that Prince Andrew did not grope Ms wand -. Nor did they have sex. There was no orgy in Little St James. More questions coming directly to us from Mail via Ed. Amanda EFTA_R1_00483607 EFTA01990860

Technical Artifacts (2)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domaingmail.com
Domaingmail.conteevacationggmail.com

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.