Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta01993037DOJ Data Set 10Correspondence

EFTA Document EFTA01993037

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-efta01993037
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading PDF viewer...

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
To: [email protected][[email protected]]; J [email protected]] From: GMAX Sent: Tue 3/22/2011 12:33:10 PM Subject: Re: Title: Re: I thought you said not to involve Donald- anyway so now the die is case — you now have to get her employment record — It will either show she started work in 1999 or 2000 as she was full time there and I believe you cannot be a minor and work full time anywhere so she had to be at least 16 to be in full time employment. Perhaps start that way — that alone would kill her allegation that she was 15 — as I said you cant work full time anywhere at that age..either that or she gave fake ID to Marlargo which is also possible..however — lets see if you get the info..and please confirm the labour law On 3/22/11 8:25 AM, "J Jep" <[email protected]> wrote: Forwarded messa e From: Nicholas L.Ribis < Date: Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 8:22 AM Subject: Re: To: [email protected] Call u in AM I will check From: Jeffrey Epstein Imailto:[email protected]) Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 08:19 AM To: Nicholas L.Ribis Subject: nick, the girl in the new papers that has made all this trouble said she worked at marlago when she was 15. in 98„ / I virtualy positve that is a lie. it was when she was 17, in 2000. He name is . who would i go to verify, I dont' know how Donald would respond„? EFTA_R1_00486517 EFTA01993037

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA02016959

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00014068

0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02414102

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that other improper relationships exist between Government agents and Epstein. Please provide any documents, correspondence, and other information regarding the possibility of any improper relationship, including: a) involvement in and/or awareness of any aspect of the Government's criminal investigation and/or possible prosecution/non-prosecution of Epstein; b) Attorney liklimenvolvement in and/or awareness of the Government's interest."( witness, subject, or target of the Epstein investigation, including Sarah Ghislaine Maxwell, Nadia Marcinkova, Lesley Groff, Haley Robson, Louella Ruboyo, Larry Morrison, Larry Visoki, David Rogers, William Hammond, and Robert Roxburgh; c) All documents, correspondence, and other information reflecting telephone calls (includin telephone logs and telephone billing statements) made by or received by m Jeffrey Epstein, the Florida Science

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02351991

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court upon Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 361); the United States's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 408); Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion to Compel Answers (DE 348) and Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Finding Waiver of Work Product and Similar Protections by Government and for Production of Documents (DE 414). The Motions are fully briefed and ripe for review. The Court has carefully considered the Motions and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. I. Background The facts, as culled from affidavits, exhibits, depositions, answers to interrogatories and reasonably inferred, for the purpose of these motions, are as follows: From betw

33p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.