Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta02000975DOJ Data Set 10Correspondence

EFTA Document EFTA02000975

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-efta02000975
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
To: jeevacationtisgmail.com[[email protected]]; G G [email protected]] From: GMAX Sent: Wed 6/15/2011 2:48:41 PM Subject: FW: How about this Title: FW: How about this Forwarded Message From: G G Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:46:54 -0400 To: Brian Basham Conversation: How about this Subject: How about this Dear Ed ;J To answer some questions - I do not share any homes anywhere with Mr. Epstein. Mr. Epstein does not support me in any way at all. Mr. Epstein's sentence and the circumstances to which that related occurred many years after our relationship had ceased. I have had a long term committed relationship with someone else for the last seven years. However, I have watched with dismay the recent coverage of Prince Andrew. There appear to be many agendas at work with many interested parties and a trial by press without important facts being made known to the public to allow them to understand the back drop for the reason for this story that is over 10 years old. The involvement of a lawyer who was a Partner in a law firm that created fake cases against Mr. Epstein and who marketed those fake settlements and cases to bilk investors has not been mentioned nor the fact the CEO of that firm was just sent to jail for 50 years for his part for those crimes. Nor is in mentioned anywhere that investigations continue into the now defunct firm, and, that one would expect any ex-partners and other ex employees of the Rothstein firm that were involved in this illegal scheme to be subject to charges and legal proceedings. Nor is it mentioned Mr. Roberts civil suit , along with her false allegations in it, emerged at the time that Rothstein firm was creating fictitious suits against Mr. Epstein and that Ms Robert's statements have never been taken under oath. Nor has it been mentioned that she had previous Sexual suits against several other people before she had met Mr. Epstein and that the cases did not ahead. She was found to "lack credibility". I have not see mention of Ms. Roberts arrest for stealing nor that she failed to appear in court for her hearing and that soon after that is when she left the country eventually ending up in Australia. No do I see mention of the large amount of money she has been paid by at least one British national newspaper for her story which is incentive enough to want to keep adding and embellishing as a means to keep the story going, and her income rising, which should make one treat any statements with great skepticism and suspicion. So with the unlikely inclusion in any story on this subject to explain the reason for the questions or their context I don't want to give credibility and perpetuate a story that is nothing but a EFTA_R1_00497561 EFTA02000975 tissue of lies End of Forwarded Message EFTA_R1_00497562 EFTA02000976

Technical Artifacts (3)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domainjeevacationtisgmail.com

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01823003

2p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA02016521

0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: Edward Epstein <

1p
House OversightUnknown

Civil lawsuit alleges Epstein‑Maxwell sex‑trafficking scheme tied to federal plea negotiations and possible high‑level cover‑up

Civil lawsuit alleges Epstein‑Maxwell sex‑trafficking scheme tied to federal plea negotiations and possible high‑level cover‑up The passage provides concrete allegations from a civil complaint (named plaintiff Ransome) that Jeffrey Epstein recruited a young masseuse with promises of fashion‑design work, kept her passport, and forced sex with powerful figures. It links the timeline to a non‑prosecution agreement negotiated by federal prosecutors (including an unnamed Acosta) and notes that the deal quashed an FBI investigation. The mention of Prince Andrew, [REDACTED - Survivor], and potential involvement of senior DOJ officials gives actionable leads (names, dates, alleged transactions) that merit follow‑up, though the claims are unverified and rely on a single civil filing. Key insights: Ransome’s civil complaint (filed Jan 2017) alleges Epstein promised career help in exchange for sex and kept her passport.; Complaint ties alleged abuse to the period when Epstein’s lawyers were negotiating a non‑prosecution agreement with federal prosecutors (Acosta et al.).; The plea deal allowed Epstein to plead guilty to state prostitution charges, receive a private‑wing jail sentence, and allegedly halted an FBI probe into an international trafficking network.

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Compilation of public links referencing Jeffrey Epstein and associated personalities

The passage merely aggregates publicly available web links and generic descriptions about Jeffrey Epstein, his foundation, and his alleged connections. It provides no new factual leads, specific trans List of URLs to Wikipedia, news articles, and promotional sites about Epstein. Mentions of known associates such as Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Leslie Wexne References to Epste

1p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01385042

0p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.