EFTA Document EFTA02018457

EFTA02018457

Alan Dershowitz Extended Rebuttal to [REDACTED - Survivor] Allegations

Case 1:19-cv-03377-LAP Document 90 Filed 11/07/19 Page 1 of 37 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 19-cv-03377-LAP v. ALAN DERSHOWITZ, Defendant. ANSWER WITH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES AND COUNTERCLAIMS Defendant Alan Dershowitz (“Dershowitz”) hereby answers the Complaint of Plaintiff [REDACTED - Survivor] (“Giuffre”) and asserts Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims as follows: ANSWER NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. This paragrap

Epstein _ 001

yl . on on TRI ILITYUIY & JOHN CONNOLLY WITH Tim MALLOY A POWERFUL BILLIDNAIRE. THE SEX SEANDAL THAT UNDID HIM. AND ALL § THE JUSTIGE THAT MONEY CAN BUY: : | THE SHOCKING TRUE STORY OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN ‘ de HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010477 5 ~ I] i A { doit see what it adds to the Rf ¥ ? Bl pois atm Desc . rely . BY crn nal ” CRE! hat © MO — Ju, a that time, no criminal L : 2 a irs had been lnuached. And In fa od he curaors of Fpstein's dealings [5 > a 110 be just that — Tumors. a J ie lawyers, his ed

EFTA02729648

Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM

Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 35 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/07/2009 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARRAIJOHNSON C.M. A., Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and SARAH KELLEN, Defendants, DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CAUSE OF ACTION Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, ("EPSTEIN"), by and through his undersigned counsel, moves to dismiss Count I of Plaintiffs Complaint for failure to state a cause of action. Rule 12(b)(6), Fed.R.Civ.P. (2008). Count II is directed only to Defendant KELLEN, who has not yet been served. In support of dismissal, Defendant states: Plaintiff, CMA, attempts to assert a cause of action against EPSTEIN in Count I of her Complaint. A review of the inadequate Complaint allegations establishes that Plaintiff has failed to state a cause of action under either common or statutory law, and thus, Count I against EPSTEIN is required to be dismissed. R

EFTA01387839