Skip to main content
Skip to content
EFTA Document EFTA02090474EFTA Document EFTA02090476
Case File
efta-efta02090475DOJ Data Set 10Correspondence

EFTA Document EFTA02090475

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-efta02090475
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

Download Original PDF
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
To: Lesley Groff[ From: Jeffrey E. Sent Mon 12/1/2014 2:51:20 PM Subject Re: Leon Black yes On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Lesley Groff wrote: Melanie says Leon had asked if you could do drinks tonight at 6pm...OK for you? Mon. Dec. 1.2014 NY 12:30pm Appt iv/Grego°, Riches 2:00pm Appt 7:00pm TENTATIVE Dinner w/Barnaby Marsh (awaiting confirmation reply from Barnaby) please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA_R1_00588320 EFTA02090475

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA S 120 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x THE GOVERNMENT'S OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT'S PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney Southern District of New York Attorney for the United States of America Assistant United States Attorneys - Of Counsel - EFTA00039421 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 BACKGROUND 2 ARGUMENT 3 I. Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement Is Irrelevant to This Case 3 A. The NPA Does Not Bind the Southern District of New York 4 1. The Text of the Agreement Does Not Contain a Promise to Bind Other Districts 5 2. The Defendant Has Offered No Evidence That the NPA Binds Other Districts 9 B. The NPA Does Not Immunize Maxwell from Prosecution 15 1. The NPA Is Limited to Particular Crimes Between 2001 and 2007 15 2. The NPA Does Not Confer Enforceable Rights on Maxwell 17 C. The Defendant

239p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01839593

0p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01939945

0p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA02103780

0p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA02120975

0p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01895466

0p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

DonateMore ways to support →
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.