EFTA Document EFTA02104621

To: Russo, Raphael M Cc: Ezrin . Gre ory From: Sent: Tue 6/3/2014 6:10:26 PM Subject: Re: For Jeffrey: supporting organization roadmap great. thanks On Jun 3, 2014, at 1:56 PM, "Russo, Raphael M" < wrote: My office number is and my cell phone is IRS Circular 230 disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. http://www.paulweiss.com/filesitbl s29Publications/FileUpload5679/5647/230.pdf Raphael M. Russo I Partner Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LIP 1285 Avenue of the Americas I New York NY 10019-6064 From: Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2014 12:53 PM To: Russo, Raphael M Subject: Re: For Jeffrey: supporting organization roadmap Hello Raphael. Could you provide me with a phone number in case Jeffrey wants to call you after 5pm today? Sent from my iPhone On Jun 3, 2014, at 10:54 AM, "Russo, Raphael M" wrote: We took a look over the weekend at the supporting organization roadmap that you sent us and have the following observations: Most importantly, there are a number of features described in the roadmap that suggest a level of oversight by the Parent that could deem it to control the SO. By way of example: • The donor is entitled to appoint only a minority of the board of the EFTA_R1_00717489 EFTA02104621 SO (pg 2). The Parent must elect a majority of the SO board (pg 4). • The SO board may not be controlled by "disqualified persons" which includes major donors and their related parties (pg 4). • The SO must be free to accept/ reject any suggestion or request made by the donor (pg 2) and in the case of NPT, has rejected some grant requests in the past (pg 5) • Concentrated positions may be retained by the SO "if good investments" and "the aggregate public charity asset allocation is prudently diversified" (pg 3). This suggests a level of investment oversight at the Parent level or at the SO level under the direction of the Parent. • Parent may delegate or accept recommendations from the SO subcommittees with regard to investments and grantmaking (pg 4). • SO is subject to prudent investing standards (pg 5). Taken together, these features suggest to us that while it should be possible to establish information barriers to separate the SOs from each other and the Parent for insider trading purposes, you would have to aggregate holdings at the parent level for purposes of Section 13d and Section 16. Let us know if you want to discuss this further or otherwise prepare for tonight's call. IRS Circular 230 disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. Click Here for More Information Raphael M. Russo l Partner Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP 1285 Avenue of the Americas I New York, NY 10019-6064 "Fins message is intended only for the use of the Addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please erase all copies of the message and its attachments and notify us immediately. EFTA_R1_00717490 EFTA02104622